15 research outputs found
Causality re-established
Causality never gained the status of a "law" or "principle" in physics. Some
recent literature even popularized the false idea that causality is a notion
that should be banned from theory. Such misconception relies on an alleged
universality of reversibility of laws of physics, based either on determinism
of classical theory, or on the multiverse interpretation of quantum theory, in
both cases motivated by mere interpretational requirements for realism of the
theory. Here, I will show that a properly defined unambiguous notion of
causality is a theorem of quantum theory, which is also a falsifiable
proposition of the theory. Such causality notion appeared in the literature
within the framework of operational probabilistic theories. It is a genuinely
theoretical notion, corresponding to establish a definite partial order among
events, in the same way as we do by using the future causal cone on Minkowski
space. The causality notion is logically completely independent of the
misidentified concept of "determinism", and, being a consequence of quantum
theory, is ubiquitous in physics. In addition, as classical theory can be
regarded as a restriction of quantum theory, causality holds also in the
classical case, although the determinism of the theory trivializes it. I then
conclude arguing that causality naturally establishes an arrow of time. This
implies that the scenario of the "Block Universe" and the connected "Past
Hypothesis" are incompatible with causality, and thus with quantum theory: they
both are doomed to remain mere interpretations and, as such, not falsifiable,
similar to the hypothesis of "super-determinism". This article is part of a
discussion meeting issue "Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on
contemporary society".Comment: Presented at the Royal Society of London, on 11/12/ 2017, at the
conference "Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on contemporary
society". To appear on Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
Minimal Length Scale Scenarios for Quantum Gravity
We review the question of whether the fundamental laws of nature limit our
ability to probe arbitrarily short distances. First, we examine what insights
can be gained from thought experiments for probes of shortest distances, and
summarize what can be learned from different approaches to a theory of quantum
gravity. Then we discuss some models that have been developed to implement a
minimal length scale in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. These
models have entered the literature as the generalized uncertainty principle or
the modified dispersion relation, and have allowed the study of the effects of
a minimal length scale in quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics,
thermodynamics, black-hole physics and cosmology. Finally, we touch upon the
question of ways to circumvent the manifestation of a minimal length scale in
short-distance physics.Comment: Published version available at
http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2013-
Varying constants, Gravitation and Cosmology
Fundamental constants are a cornerstone of our physical laws. Any constant
varying in space and/or time would reflect the existence of an almost massless
field that couples to matter. This will induce a violation of the universality
of free fall. It is thus of utmost importance for our understanding of gravity
and of the domain of validity of general relativity to test for their
constancy. We thus detail the relations between the constants, the tests of the
local position invariance and of the universality of free fall. We then review
the main experimental and observational constraints that have been obtained
from atomic clocks, the Oklo phenomenon, Solar system observations, meteorites
dating, quasar absorption spectra, stellar physics, pulsar timing, the cosmic
microwave background and big bang nucleosynthesis. At each step we describe the
basics of each system, its dependence with respect to the constants, the known
systematic effects and the most recent constraints that have been obtained. We
then describe the main theoretical frameworks in which the low-energy constants
may actually be varying and we focus on the unification mechanisms and the
relations between the variation of different constants. To finish, we discuss
the more speculative possibility of understanding their numerical values and
the apparent fine-tuning that they confront us with.Comment: 145 pages, 10 figures, Review for Living Reviews in Relativit