37 research outputs found
The association of physician empathy with cancer patient outcomes: A meta-analysis.
In oncology, research remains unclear as to whether physician empathy is associated with patient outcomes. Our goal was to answer this question and explore potential moderators of the association.
In this meta-analysis on adult cancer care, we excluded randomised controlled trials, and studies of survivors without active disease or involving analogue patients. Eight databases were searched, in addition to reference lists of relevant articles and grey literature. Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and graded quality of evidence by using the AXIS tool. Effect size correlations (ESr) were chosen and pooled by using a random effect model. Subgroup analyses were performed, and statistically significant variables were introduced in a meta-regression. Several methods were used to explore heterogeneity and publication biases.
We included 55 articles, yielding 55 ESr (n = 12,976 patients). Physician empathy was associated with favourable patient outcomes: ESr = 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.18 to 0.27), z = 9.58, p < 0.001. However, heterogeneity was high, as reflected by a large prediction interval, 95% (-0.07 to 0.49) and I <sup>2</sup> = 94.5%. The meta-regression explained 53% of variance. Prospective designs and physician empathy assessed by researchers, compared with patient-reported empathy, decreased ESr. Bad-news consultations, compared with all other types of clinical encounters, tended to increase ESr.
Patient-reported physician empathy is significantly associated with cancer patient outcomes. However, the high heterogeneity warrants further longitudinal studies to disentangle the conditions under which physician empathy can help patients. Recommendations are proposed for future research
Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses' consultations
Background:
Increasingly healthcare policies emphasise the importance of person-centred, empathic care. Consequently, healthcare professionals are expected to demonstrate the âhumanâ aspects of care in training and in practice. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure is a patient-rated measure of the interpersonal skills of healthcare practitioners. It has been widely validated for use by healthcare professionals in both primary and secondary care. This paper reports on the validity and reliability of the CARE Measure with sexual health nurses.
Methods:
Patient questionnaires were collected for 943 consultations with 20 sexual health nurses. Participating patients self-completed the questionnaire immediately after the encounter with the nurse. The questionnaire included the ten item CARE Measure, the Patient Enablement Index, and overall satisfaction instruments. Construct validity was assessed through Spearmanâs correlation and principal component analysis. Internal consistence was assessed through Cronbachâs alpha and the inter-rater reliability through Generalisability Theory. Data were collected in 2013 in Scotland.
Results:
Female patients completed 68% of the questionnaires. The mean patient age was 28.8 years (standard deviation 9.8 years). Two of the 20 participating nurses withdrew from the study. Most patients (71.7%) regarded the CARE Measure items as very important to their consultation and the number of ânot applicableâ and missing responsesâ were low (2.6% and 0.1% respectively). The participating nurses had high CARE Measure scores; out of a maximum possible score of 50, the overall mean CARE measure score was 47.8 (standard deviation 4.4). The scores were moderately correlated with patient enablement (rhoâ=â0.232, pâ=â0.001) and overall satisfaction (rhoâ=â0.377, pâ=â0.001. Cronbachâs alpha showed the measureâs high internal consistency (Cronbachâs alpha coefficientâ=â0.95), but the inter-rater reliability could not be calculated due to the high achieved CARE Measure scores that varied little between nurses.
Conclusions:
Within this clinical context the CARE Measure has high perceived relevance and face validity. The findings support construct validity and some evidence of reliability. The high CARE Measure scores may have been due to sample bias. A future study which ensures a representative sample of patients on a larger group of nurses is required to determine whether the measure can discriminate between nurses
Measuring empathy in pediatrics: validation of the Visual CARE measure
Background: Empathy is a key element of âPatient and Family Centered Careâ, a clinical approach recommended
by the American Academy of Pediatrics. However, there is a lack of validated tools to evaluate paediatrician
empathy. This study aimed to validate the Visual CARE Measure, a patient rated questionnaire measuring physician
empathy, in the setting of a Pediatric Emergency Department (ED).
Methods: The empathy of physicians working in the Pediatric ED of the University Hospital of Udine, Italy, was
assessed using an Italian translation of the Visual Care Measure. This test has three versions suited to different age
groups: the 5Q questionnaire was administered to children aged 7â11, the 10Q version to those older than 11, and
the 10QâParent questionnaire to parents of children younger than 7.
The internal reliability, homogeneity and construct validity of the 5Q and 10Q/10QâParent versions of the Visual
Care Measure, were separately assessed. The influence of family background on the rating of physician empathy
and satisfaction with the clinical encounter was also evaluated.
Results: Seven physicians and 416 children and their parents were included in the study. Internal consistency
measured by Cronbachâs alpha was 0.95 for the 10Q/10QâParent versions and 0.88 for the 5Q version. The
item-total correlation was > 0.75 for each item. An exploratory factor analysis showed that all the items load
onto the first factor.
Physiciansâ empathy scores correlated with patientsâ satisfaction for both the 10Q and 10QâParent questionnaires
(Spearmanâs rho = 0.7189; p < 0.001) and for the 5Q questionnaire (Spearmanâs rho = 0.5968; p < 0,001). Trust in the
consulting physician was lower among immigrant parents (OR 0.43. 95% CI 0.20â0.93).
Conclusions: The Visual Care Measure is a reliable second-person test of physician empathy in the setting of a
Pediatric Emergency Room. More studies are needed to evaluate the reliability of this instrument in other pediatric
settings distinct from the Emergency Room and to further evaluate its utility in measuring the impact of
communication and empathy training programmes for healthcare professionals working in pediatrics
Long term posttraumatic growth after breast cancer: prevalence, predictors and relationships with psychological health.
International audienceThis study evaluated the prevalence and predictors of long term posttraumatic growth (PTG) after breast cancer, and relationships of PTG with psychological health in a random sample of 307 currently disease-free women 5-15 years after diagnosis. This cross-sectional study reveals long term posttraumatic growth scores comparable to those found in shorter term studies. Prevalence of a better appreciation of life is especially noteworthy. With the exception of perceived current sequelae of disease associated in a somewhat curvilinear fashion with PTG, demographic and medical variables are poor predictors of the issue. On the contrary, dispositional positive affectivity and adaptative coping of positive, active, relational, religious and to some extent denial coping have a strong effect on growth. Finally, PTG is slightly associated with mental quality of life and happiness. Findings are discussed in the light of posttraumatic growth theory
Psychologie de la santé et éducation thérapeutique : état des lieux et perspectives
International audienc
Social Problem Solving and Posttraumatic Growth New Possibilities in Postoperative Breast Cancer Survivors
A Qualitative Analysis of the Preoperative Needs of Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer
Revie â: the influence of a life review intervention including a positive, patient-centered approach towards enhancing the personal dignity of patients with advanced cancerâa study protocol for a feasibility study using a mixed method investigation
Lorsque le doute sâinstalle dans la prise de dĂ©cision thĂ©rapeutique :la nĂ©cessitĂ© de repenser la formation des oncologues
Medical advances lead to complex decision-making in oncology. The doubt associated with these decisions can lead to negative reactions among patients and physicians. An international study recently showed physiciansâ difficulties to apply communication skills that could reduce these negative reactions. Physicians working in oncology may benefit from specific communication skill training programs focusing on high-uncertainty contexts to improve the quality of their therapeutic decisions.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe