39 research outputs found
Endometrial cancer
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological
malignancy in well-developed countries.
Biologically and clinicopathologically,
endometrial carcinomas are divided into two
types: type 1 or estrogen-dependent carcinomas
and type 2 or estrogen-independent carcinomas.
Type 1 cancers correspond mainly to endometrioid
carcinomas and account for approximately
90 % of endometrial cancers, whereas
type 2 cancers correspond to the majority of the
other histopathological subtypes.
The vast majority of endometrial cancers
present as abnormal vaginal bleedings in
postmenopausal women. Therefore, 75 % of
cancers are diagnosed at an early stage, which
makes the overall prognosis favorable.
The first diagnostic step to evaluate women
with an abnormal vaginal bleeding is the measurement
of the endometrial thickness with
transvaginal ultrasound. If endometrial thickening
or heterogeneity is confirmed, a biopsy
should be performed to establish a definite
histopathological diagnosis.
Magnetic resonance imaging is not considered
in the International Federation of Gynaecology
and Obstetrics staging system. Nonetheless it
plays a relevant role in the preoperative staging of
endometrial carcinoma, helping to define the best
therapeutic management. Moreover, it is important
in the diagnosis of treatment complications,
in the surveillance of therapy response, and in the
assessment of recurrent disease.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Clinical and imaging features in adult patients with bone marrow haemophagocytosis with and without haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a single-institution experience
WOS: 000550213500017PubMed: 32354424AIM: To evaluate clinical, laboratory, imaging findings, and outcomes of adult patients with bone marrow haemophagocytosis (BMH) who meet the diagnostic criteria for haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) with those who do not meet the criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pathology database search was performed from 2009 to 2019 to identify adult patients with BMH. Electronic medical records of 41 patients were reviewed to distinguish those who fulfil the HLH-2004 diagnostic guidelines, which identified 22 patients (11 men; mean age, 53.5 years) who met the criteria (HLH+) and 19 patients (13 men; mean age, 54.7 years) who did not meet the criteria (HLH-). Multi-modality imaging was reviewed to record imaging features. Clinical, laboratory, imaging findings, and outcomes were compared between the two groups using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Malignancy (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) was the major trigger for both groups. 86% of HLH+ and 31% of HLH- patients presented with fever. Compared to the HLH- group, the HLH+ group exhibited higher serum ferritin, triglycerides, and lower fibrinogen levels (p<0.05). Alveolar opacities and hepatosplenomegaly were the most common imaging findings identified in both groups. Median overall survival of HLH+ and HLH- were 123.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 40.7-681.7 days) and 189 days (IQR: 52-1680 days), respectively. Distribution of imaging features and overall survival did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Malignancy is the major trigger for BMH in both HLH+ and HLH- groups. HLH+ and HLH- groups have similar imaging manifestations or clinical outcomes. Therefore, presence of BMH alone is correlated with high morbidity and mortality. (C) 2020 the Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved