Pnömonektomili Bir Hemodiyaliz Hastasında Arteriyovenöz Fistül Açılması Sonrasında Gelişen Akut Akciğer Ödemi

Arteriovenous fistula is a preferred approach to obtain vascular access in chronic hemodialysis patients. Arteriovenous fistula has some effects on cardiac and pulmonary systems. High output heart failure is a rare but an important complication of arteriovenous fistula. We report here a case of acute pulmonary arteriovenous fistula in a hemodialysis edema after creatin

Ambulatory blood pressure and endothelial dysfunction in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Cardiovascular problems are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Endothelial dysfunction (ED), which is an early manifestation of vascular injury, has been shown in patients with ADPKD. However, the association between ambulatory blood pressure and ED has not been investigated in these patients. Forty-one patients with ADPKD having well-preserved renal function were included in the study. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed in all patients. Patients were divided into dipper and non-dipper groups. Endothelial function of the brachial artery was evaluated by using high-resolution vascular ultrasound. Endothelial-dependent dilatation was expressed as the percentage change in the brachial artery diameter from baseline to reactive hyperemia. The mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure was similar in both groups (125.5 +/- 10.7 mmHg in dippers and 121.2 +/- 14.3 in non-dippers, p > 0.05). There was also no significant difference between the mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressures in both groups (82.3 +/- 9.6 mmHg in dippers and 77.1 +/- 8.6 mmHg in non-dippers, p > 0.05). The nocturnal fall rate in systolic blood pressure was 11.1 +/- 1.2% in dippers and 0.98 +/- 0.9% in non-dippers (p = 0.001). The nocturnal fall rate in diastolic blood pressure was 14.0 +/- 0.9% in dippers and 3.8 +/- 0.8% in non-dippers (p = 0.001). Endothelial-dependent dilatation was significantly higher in dippers compared to non-dippers (6.22 +/- 4.14% versus 3.57 +/- 2.52%, p = 0.025). Non-dipper patients with ADPKD show significant ED, which has an important impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Aprepitant on the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Quality of Life with Functional Living Index Emesis

Objective: Functional Living Index Emesis (FLIE) is developed to evaluate the relationship between emesis and it's effects on patient's daily life and is far more relevant to detect the effectiveness of antiemetic treatment compared with self-diary reports. In this study, the efficacy of oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and quality of life is evaluated with FLIE. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Material and Methods: Sixty patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) receiving a chemotherapy regimen consisting of Cisplatin and Docetaxel were evaluated. The patients were prospectively randomized to two groups before the first cycle of chemotherapy. Patients in Group A (31 patients) received 3 daily doses of aprepitant along with oral ondansetron and dexamethasone. The patients in group B (29 patients) received only ondansetron and dexamathasone. The efficacy of both regimens was evaluated by a modified Turkish version of FLIE scale consisting of 18 questions. Results: The number of patients with complete response was 31 in the whole group. Of these 18 patients (58%) were in Group A (Aprepitant) and 13 patients in group B (42%). Median FLIE score in group A was 24.97 (±12.45) while it was 38.1 (±26.987) in group B and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.022). Total score >20 was seen in only 5 of 31 patients in aprepitant group (16%) showing the significant efficiency of aprepitant on quality of life, while in group B, 13 of 29 patients (44%) had total scores >20 (p=0.02). Conclusion: Regarding these findings, it is certain to state that aprepitant in combination with other drugs optimizes protection against both nausea and vomiting compared to the prior standard of care, and must be recommended as first-line therapy for patients who are treated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy