Lung cancer

The present article reviews basic concepts about diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer patients. The authors also discuss current aspects of the international literature in the field. This review is intended to medical students, pulmonologists and family doctors.Este artigo contém os fundamentos básicos para o diagnóstico, tratamento e conduta dos pacientes portadores do carcinoma broncogênico. Nele, ainda, descrevemos os conhecimentos mais recentes que são discutidos na literatura mundial. É voltado para graduandos, pós-graduandos de Pneumologia, pneumologistas e generalistas

Reliability of the Brazilian version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Lung (FACT‐L) and the FACT‐Lung Symptom Index (FLSI)

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the Brazilian version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) with the FACT-Lung Symptom Index (FLSI) questionnaire. INTRODUCTION: The assessment of quality of life in patients with lung cancer has become an important evaluative endpoint in current clinical trials. For lung cancer patients, one of the most common quality of life tools available is the FACT-L. Despite the amount of data available regarding this questionnaire, there are no data on its performance in Brazilian lung cancer patients. METHODS: The FACT-L with the FLSI questionnaire was prospectively administered to 30 consecutive, stable, lung cancer outpatients at baseline and at 2 weeks. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient between test and retest for the FACT-L ranged from 0.79 to 0.96 and for the FLSI was 0.87. There was no correlation between these questionnaire dimensions and clinical or functional parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian version of the FACT-L with FLSI questionnaire is reliable and is quick and simple to apply. This instrument can now be used to properly evaluate the quality of life of Brazilian lung cancer patients

Survival in a cohort of patients with lung cancer: the role of age and gender in prognosis

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as well as their disease course, by age group and gender. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with NSCLC from 2000 to 2012 and followed until July 2015 in a tertiary referral hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Based on the 25th and 75th percentiles of the age distribution, patients were stratified into three age groups: < 55 years; ≥ 55 and < 72 years; and ≥ 72 years. Survival time was evaluated during the follow-up period of the study. Functions of overall and gender-specific survival stratified by age groups (event: all-cause mortality) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences among survival curves were assessed via the log-rank test. Results: We included 790 patients with the following age distribution: < 55 years, 165 patients; ≥ 55 and < 72 years, 423; and ≥ 72 years, 202. In the entire sample, there were 493 men (62.4%). Adenocarcinoma was the most common histological pattern in the < 72-year age groups; 575 patients (73%) presented with advanced disease (stages IIIB-IV). The median 5-year survival was 12 months (95% CI: 4-46 months), with no significant differences among the age groups studied. Conclusions: NSCLC remains more common in men, although we found an increase in the proportion of the disease in women in the < 55-year age group. Adenocarcinoma predominated in women. In men, squamous cell carcinoma predominated in the ≥ 72-year age group. Most patients presented with advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. There were no statistical differences in survival between genders or among age groups

Relação entre a magnitude de sintomas e a qualidade de vida: análise de agrupamentos de pacientes com câncer de pulmão no Brasil Relationship between the magnitude of symptoms and the quality of life: a cluster analysis of lung cancer patients in Brazil

OBJETIVO: Muitas vezes pacientes com câncer de pulmão vivenciam mudanças físicas e psicossociais profundas que resultam da progressão da doença ou dos efeitos colaterais do tratamento. Fadiga, dor, dispneia, depressão e distúrbios do sono parecem ser os sintomas mais comuns nesses pacientes. O objetivo deste estudo foi examinar a prevalência de sintomas em pacientes com câncer de pulmão a fim de identificar subgrupos (clusters) de pacientes, agrupados de acordo com a magnitude dos sintomas, bem como comparar os subgrupos quanto à qualidade de vida. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal utilizando agrupamento hierárquico aglomerativo. Foram avaliadas as características demográficas de 50 pacientes com câncer de pulmão, bem como sua pontuação em três questionários de qualidade de vida: o 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), o Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung e o Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-form Survey. A análise de agrupamentos (clusters) levou em conta a magnitude dos sintomas de maior prevalência de acordo com as escalas de sintomas do EORTC QLQC-30; esses sintomas foram fadiga, dor, dispneia e insônia. RESULTADOS: Foram identificados três agrupamentos (subgrupos) de pacientes, baseados na magnitude dos quatro sintomas mais prevalentes. Os três subgrupos de pacientes foram os seguintes: pacientes com sintomas leves (n = 30; 60%); pacientes com sintomas moderados (n = 14; 28%) e pacientes com sintomas graves (n = 6; 12%). O subgrupo de pacientes com sintomas graves apresentou a pior qualidade de vida, conforme mensurada pelos escores totais e pelas dimensões integradas dos três instrumentos. CONCLUSÕES: Este estudo destaca a importância da avaliação de agrupamentos de sintomas como uma ferramenta relevante para medir a qualidade de vida de pacientes com doenças crônicas, como o câncer de pulmão.<br>OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer patients often experience profound physical and psychosocial changes as a result of disease progression or treatment side effects. Fatigue, pain, dyspnea, depression, and sleep disturbances appear to be the most common symptoms in such patients. The objective of the present study was to examine the prevalence of symptoms in lung cancer patients in order to identify subgroups (clusters) of patients, grouped according to the magnitude of the symptoms, as well as to compare the quality of life among the identified subgroups. METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving agglomerative hierarchical clustering. A total of 50 lung cancer patients were evaluated in terms of their demographic characteristics and their scores on three quality of life questionnaires, namely the 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung, and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-form Survey. The cluster analysis took into account the magnitude of the most prevalent symptoms as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom scale scores; those symptoms were fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and insomnia. RESULTS: Three clusters (subgroups)_of patients were identified on the basis of the magnitude of the four most prevalent symptoms. The three subgroups of patients were as follows: patients with mild symptoms (n = 30; 60%); patients with moderate symptoms (n = 14; 28%); and patients with severe symptoms (n = 6; 12%). The subgroup of patients with severe symptoms had the worst quality of life, as assessed by the total scores and by the integrated domains of all three instruments. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of symptom cluster assessment as an important tool to assess the quality of life of patients with chronic diseases, such as lung cancer

Family caregiver burden: the burden of caring for lung cancer patients according to the cancer stage and patient quality of life

ABSTRACT Objective: Patients with lung cancer experience different feelings and reactions, based on their family, social, cultural, and religious backgrounds, which are a source of great distress, not only for the patients but also for their family caregivers. This study aimed to evaluate the impact that lung cancer stage and quality of life (QoL) of lung cancer patients have on caregiver burden. Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Consecutive patient-caregiver dyads were selected and asked to complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item ShortForm Health Survey (SF-36). Family caregivers also completed the Caregiver Burden Scale. Group-based modeling was used in order to identify patients with early- or advanced-stage cancer (IA to IIIA vs. IIIB to IV) plus non-impaired or impaired QoL (SF36 total score > 50 vs. &#8804; 50). Patient-caregiver dyads were stratified into four groups: early-stage cancer+non-impaired QoL; advanced-stage cancer+non-impaired QoL; early-stage cancer+impaired QoL; and advanced-stage cancer+impaired QoL. Results: We included 91 patient-caregiver dyads. The majority of the patients were male and heavy smokers. Family caregivers were younger and predominantly female. The burden, QoL, level of anxiety, and level of depression of caregivers were more affected by the QoL of the patients than by their lung cancer stage. The family caregivers of the patients with impaired QoL showed a higher median burden than did those of the patients with non-impaired QoL, regardless of disease stage. Conclusions: Caregiver burden is more affected by patient QoL than by lung cancer stage

Family caregiver burden: the burden of caring for lung cancer patients according to the cancer stage and patient quality of life

ABSTRACT Objective: Patients with lung cancer experience different feelings and reactions, based on their family, social, cultural, and religious backgrounds, which are a source of great distress, not only for the patients but also for their family caregivers. This study aimed to evaluate the impact that lung cancer stage and quality of life (QoL) of lung cancer patients have on caregiver burden. Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Consecutive patient-caregiver dyads were selected and asked to complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item ShortForm Health Survey (SF-36). Family caregivers also completed the Caregiver Burden Scale. Group-based modeling was used in order to identify patients with early- or advanced-stage cancer (IA to IIIA vs. IIIB to IV) plus non-impaired or impaired QoL (SF36 total score > 50 vs. ≤ 50). Patient-caregiver dyads were stratified into four groups: early-stage cancer+non-impaired QoL; advanced-stage cancer+non-impaired QoL; early-stage cancer+impaired QoL; and advanced-stage cancer+impaired QoL. Results: We included 91 patient-caregiver dyads. The majority of the patients were male and heavy smokers. Family caregivers were younger and predominantly female. The burden, QoL, level of anxiety, and level of depression of caregivers were more affected by the QoL of the patients than by their lung cancer stage. The family caregivers of the patients with impaired QoL showed a higher median burden than did those of the patients with non-impaired QoL, regardless of disease stage. Conclusions: Caregiver burden is more affected by patient QoL than by lung cancer stage

Localização do carcinoma pulmonar em relação ao vício tabágico e ao sexo Location of lung carcinoma in relation to the smoking habit and gender

OBJETIVO: Analisar a localização do carcinoma pulmonar em relação ao tabagismo e ao sexo. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 697 pacientes portadores de carcinoma broncogênico do Ambulatório de Oncopneumologia da Universidade Federal de São Paulo, retrospectivamente, relacionando o vício tabágico e o sexo com a localização do tumor (campos superior e inferior, lados direito e esquerdo). RESULTADOS: Os carcinomas broncogênicos ocorrem predominantemente no campo superior em fumantes e em maior número no campo inferior em não fumantes. Já no sexo feminino ocorreram mais neoplasias no campo inferior principalmente em não fumantes. Não houve diferenças em relação ao lobo (direito ou esquerdo) nos dados estudados. CONCLUSÃO: Os carcinomas broncogênicos predominam no campo superior em fumantes e não fumantes, em maior número no campo inferior nos não fumantes. Há uma tendência de ocorrem no campo inferior no sexo feminino.<br>OBJECTIVE: To analyze the locations of lung carcinomas in relation to patient gender and smoking status. METHODS: In order to test the hypothesis that lung carcinoma location (upper or lower lobe; left or right side) is correlated with smoking status and gender, we conducted a retrospective study of 697 patients with bronchogenic carcinoma treated at the Pulmonology-Oncology Outpatient Clinic of the Federal University of São Paulo. RESULTS: We found that the bronchogenic carcinomas occurring in smokers were more frequently located in the upper lobes, whereas those occurring in nonsmokers were more frequently located in the lower lobes. In women, the neoplasms were more often seen in the lower lobes, especially in nonsmokers. Based on the available data, there were no differences in terms of the side affected (left or right). CONCLUSION: Overall, bronchogenic carcinomas are predominantly found in the upper lobes. However, in nonsmokers, they occur more frequently in the lower lobes. In females, bronchogenic carcinomas present a tendency to occur more often in the lower lobes