Testing surfactants as additives for clay improvement: compaction and suction effects

This paper presents an exploratory study on surfactants as additives to improve soil properties. It is hypothesized that surfactant molecules populate the air-water interfaces reducing surface tension and suction thus allowing a control of the mechanical response of the soil. Suction measurements by means of a high suction tensiometer, compaction tests and Atterberg limits were conducted in mixtures of sand and kaolin, with and without a surfactant solution. The results revealed a prominent effect on suction, but to a lesser extent on the Atterberg limits and compaction behavior (the maximum dry density). This targeted effect of the surfactants suggests its molecules populate, not only the air-water interfaces decreasing surface tension, but may be adsorbing to the clay particles and forming micelles in the pore water as well. Therefore the interplay between the three may influence the soil behavior

Cover systems with synthetic water repellent soils

A cover system is a crucial component of engineered landfills, to minimize water percolation into the underlying waste. Capillary barriers are an alternative cover system, which has been widely used in the arid and semiarid regions as no cohesive, low‐permeability materials are used. However, the performance of capillary barriers in tropical climate has been unsatisfactory (breakthrough observed). In recent years, synthetic water‐repellent granular materials have drawn increasing attention due to their distinctive hydraulic behavior (inhibited water infiltration and high water entry pressure), suggesting they may also be used to improve the performance of cover systems. In this study, flume tests were conducted with inclined model slopes under artificial rainfall. By monitoring the surface runoff, lateral diversion, and basal percolation and conducting water balance analysis, the performance of monolithic cover, conventional capillary barrier, and water‐repellent cover systems were evaluated. The study revealed that (a) the barrier effect and diversion capacity were significantly strengthened by induced water repellency, providing a promising solution to extend the application of capillary barrier covers; and (b) cover systems can be formed using one raw material to decrease the construction cost, by using synthetic water‐repellent soil as the underlying layer

Erodibility of synthetic water repellent granular materials: adapting the ground to weather extremes

Granular materials with synthetic water repellent coatings have great potential to be used in ground interfaces (ground-atmosphere-vegetation and ground-structure) as infiltration barriers, due to their altered hydrological properties (suppressed infiltration and decreased sorptivity). However, very few studies have evaluated the impact of synthetic soil water repellency on soil erosion. This paper investigates the effect of water repellency on soil erosional behavior, including splash erosion and rill processes. Twenty-four flume tests were carried out on model slopes under artificial rainfall; soils with three wettability levels were tested, including wettable (contact angle, CA  90°). Various rainfall intensities (230 mm/h, 170 mm/h, 100 mm/h and 40 mm/h) and grain sizes (Fujian sand and sand/silt mixture) were adopted. Erosional variables, including splash erosion rate, average sediment concentration, peak sediment concentration and time to peak sediment were measured to quantitatively analyze the behavior. This study confirms the impact of water repellency on soil erosion and unveils the possibility to reduce infiltration at ground-atmosphere interface with controlled soil erosion. The results revealed that: (1) synthetic water repellency does not necessarily lead to increased soil erosion yield; its impact is dependent on grain size with the soil erosion loss increasing for Fujian sand, but decreasing for sand/silt mixtures; (2) splash erosion is positively correlated to soil water repellency and high rainfall intensity, regardless of grain size; (3) the erosion processes for sand/silt mixtures are particle size selective and not affected by soil water repellency, whereas this phenomenon is not observed with Fujian sand

Hydrologic behavior of model slopes with synthetic water repellent soils

In the natural environment, soil water repellency decreases infiltration, increases runoff, and increases erosion in slopes. In the built environment, soil water repellency offers the opportunity to develop granular materials with controllable wettability for slope stabilization. In this paper, the influence of soil water repellency on the hydrological response of slopes is investigated. Twenty-four flume tests were carried out in model slopes under artificial rainfall; soils with various wettability levels were tested, including wettable (Contact Angle, CA 90°). Various rainfall intensities (30 mm/h and 70 mm/h), slope angles (20° and 40°) and relative compactions (70% and 90%) were applied to model the response of natural and man-made slopes to rainfall. To quantitatively assess the hydrological response, a number of measurements were made: runoff rate, effective rainfall rate, time to ponding, time to steady state, runoff acceleration, total water storage and wetting front rate. Overall, an increase in soil water repellency reduces infiltration and shortens the time for runoff generation, with the effects amplified for high rainfall intensity. Comparatively, the slope angle and relative compaction had only a minor contribution to the slope hydrology. The subcritical water repellent soils sustained infiltration for longer than both the wettable and water repellent soils, which presents an added advantage if they are to be used in the built environment as barriers. This study revealed substantial impacts of man-made or synthetically induced soil water repellency on the hydrological behavior of model slopes in controlled conditions. The results shed light on our understanding of hydrological processes in environments where the occurrence of natural soil water repellency is likely, such as slopes subjected to wildfires and in agricultural and forested slopes

Processes in model slopes made of mixtures of wettable and water repellent sand: Implications for the initiation of debris flows in dry slopes

Debris flows in slopes initially dry, such as post-wildfire debris flows, are initiated by surface runoff and sediment bulking due to reduced infiltration. Soil water repellency, extreme dry soils, and loose, cohesionless materials influence their initiation. The exact link between these features, the resulting infiltration processes and the initiation mechanism of a debris flow remains unclear. Here, we examine the relation between soil particle wettability and slope processes in physical models. Flume experiments were conducted in 10% increments of mass ratios of wettable to water repellent sand, subjected to artificial rainfall with monitoring of soil water content, pore water pressure, sediment and water discharge and failure mode. To date, wettability was considered only for the water repellent end, because it reduces infiltration, enhancing surface runoff. This study demonstrates that slight wettability changes, in the full wettable to water repellent range, impact a variety of slope processes. The two extremes, fully wettable and water repellent gave opposite responses, retrogressive slides for infiltration-initiated in wettable sand and erosion by surface runoff in water repellent sand. The transition was dominated by surface runoff and preferential flow, yielding a combination of erosion and slides. From the tests, a continuous capping effect generated by water repellency was a necessary condition for erosion and sand bulking i.e., the generation of runoff-initiated debris flows. The sensitivity of the model slope response to artificial rainfall was particularly acute at high ratios of wettable to water repellent sand. For mixtures above a critical ratio of wettable to water repellent sand, the measurements with an index test revealed a fully wettable material despite differences in the infiltration, saturation and pore water pressure built-up trends. Implications for post-wildfire debris flows and debris flows in slopes initially dry in general are discussed.postprin

Water-entry pressure in water repellent soils: a review

Water repellent soils can be naturally promoted (e.g. after wildfires) or synthetically induced by mixing with hydrophobic compounds (e.g. polydimethylsiloxane). The study of soil water repellency has lasted for over one century which implied the significant effect of soil water repellency on water infiltration, evaporation, soil strength, and soil stability. Water repellent soils can also be exploited by geotechnical engineers to offer novel and economical solutions for ground infrastructure. This paper synthesizes different methods for assessing soil water repellency based on varied indexes (e.g. contact angle, time for a drop to infiltrate) and with a focus on water entry pressure. Measurements of these parameters in synthetic water- repellent sands were taken, some results of which are summarized with discussion of key factors affecting water repellency. A comparison of these methods shows that water entry pressure can be more representative for assessing the water repellency of bulk samples

Erodibility in synthetic water repellent soils

ABSTRACT: Fire induced soil water repellency (or hydrophobicity) is a major contributor of post-wildfire debris flow. By altering the hydrological responses of soils, the infiltration rate is significantly reduced and surface runoff is enhanced during rainfall events, leading to the erosion and entrainment of slope surface material, and the subsequent formation of debris flows. Due to their capability of controlling infiltration of rainwater, water repellent soils have been considered to serve as fill materials in engineered slopes, and mitigate rainfall induced slope failures. However, a concern arises that surface overflow and erosion may be enhanced and accelerated on water repellent slopes. A solution for this problem would be water repellent soils with low erodibility, i.e. reducing infiltration without significantly promoting erosion. Flume tests were conducted on two materials: silica sand and completely decomposed granite (CDG). After inducing water repellency and comparing the erosion under rainfall condition, the erodibility of water repellent CDG is found to be much lower than silica sand, implying its potential to mitigate erosion induced by soil water repellency