Health-related decision-making in its personal, social and health service contexts: a critical review of relevant findings from seven publications and consideration of their contribution to understandings of decision-making and the wider field of applied health services research

Health-related decision-making, in particular patients’ involvement in decision-making about their treatment and care, has been an important and enduring concern for many practitioners and researchers working in applied health services research and allied fields. This is evidenced by the substantial (and still growing) body of work on ‘shared decision-making’ (SDM). With the aim of advancing understandings of decision-making, and the associated literature, this critical review seeks to situate, present, draw together, and critically consider, relevant findings from work (seven papers) I have first-authored. These papers arose from three applied (qualitative) health services research studies which directly or indirectly explored the experiences of different groups of patients confronted with decisions about their treatment and/or care. I begin my review with a short overview of relevant theoretical and empirical work pre-dating and informing my own research studies and publications, noting some emergent critiques, and highlighting where important gaps in evidence and understanding were said, at the time, to remain. Then, shifting focus to my own work, I introduce the three studies from which the submitted publications arose, detailing their backgrounds, aims, methods and my involvement in each. Next, I reflect on the findings of my submitted papers, noting how individually and collectively they indicate the importance of the context(s) in which health-related decisions are made. Using techniques of qualitative synthesis to identify a series of descriptive and analytic themes, I develop – and evidence – the proposition that health-related decision-making happens in, and is shaped by, its personal, social and health service contexts. This includes detailing the various ways in which different features of context may influence patients’ decision-making. I then consider, critically, how my findings fit with the wider literature. I proceed to argue that, in attending to, and highlighting, the role of context, my papers, synthesis and review provide insights that complement and extend the historic emphasis in SDM scholarship on what goes on within clinical encounters. Reflecting on the focus of more recent SDM literature (publications contemporaneous with or subsequent to work leading to the submitted papers) I note where other authors have similarly gone on to assert the importance of taking a more context-cognisant approach to understanding health-related decision-making. I also consider how other literatures (such as the classic literature of medical sociology and more recent work in psychology) support and might usefully inform this and future thinking about health-related decision-making. Moving the review towards a close, I offer an assessment of the strengths and limitations of my published work and, moreover, of my synthesis and review. I finish by reflecting upon the methodological and other learning I have accrued over the course of undertaking the contributing studies, including preparing the submitted publications, and from the process of producing this critical review

Disease-related factors affecting timely lymphoma diagnosis : a qualitative study exploring patient experiences

Background Expediting cancer diagnosis is widely perceived as one way to improve patient outcomes. Evidence indicates that lymphoma diagnosis is often delayed, yet understanding of issues influencing this is incomplete. Aim To explore patients' and their relatives' perceptions of disease-related factors affecting time to diagnosis of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Design and setting Qualitative UK study involving patients with indolent and aggressive lymphomas, and their relatives, from an established population-based cohort in the north of England. Method Semi-structured interviews with 35 patients and 15 of their relatives. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed, and qualitative descriptive analysis was undertaken. Results Participant accounts suggest that certain features of lymphoma can impact on patients' and healthcare providers' (HCPs) responses to disease onset. Three characteristics stand out: disease occurrence (rare), manifestation (varied), and investigative options (often inconclusive). Interviewees described how they, and some HCPs, lacked familiarity with lymphoma, seldom considering it a likely explanation for their symptoms. Symptoms reported were highly variable, frequently non-specific, and often initially thought to be associated with various benign, self-limiting causes. Blood tests and other investigations, while frequently able to detect abnormalities, did not reliably indicate malignancy. Interviewees reported the potential for improvements among HCPs in information gathering, communication of uncertainty, and re-presentation advice for non-resolving/ progressive health changes. Conclusion This study demonstrates the complex characteristics of lymphoma, perceived by patients as prolonging time to diagnosis, often despite significant effort by themselves, their relatives, and HCPs to expedite this process. The findings also illustrate why simple solutions to delayed diagnosis of lymphoma are lacking

Feasibility and design of a trial regarding the optimal mode of delivery for preterm birth:the CASSAVA multiple methods study

Background: Around 60,000 babies are born preterm (prior to 37 weeks’ gestation) each year in the UK. There is little evidence on the optimal birth mode (vaginal or caesarean section). Objective: The overall aim of the CASSAVA project was to determine if a trial to define the optimal mode of preterm birth could be carried out and, if so, determine what sort of trial could be conducted and how it could best be performed. We aimed to determine the specific groups of preterm women and babies for whom there are uncertainties about the best planned mode of birth, and if there would be willingness to recruit to, and participate in, a randomised trial to address some, but not all, of these uncertainties. This project was conducted in response to a Heath Technology Assessment programme commissioning call (17/22 ‘Mode of delivery for preterm infants’). Methods: We conducted clinician and patient surveys (n = 224 and n = 379, respectively) to identify current practice and opinion, and a consensus survey and Delphi workshop (n = 76 and n = 22 participants, respectively) to inform the design of a hypothetical clinical trial. The protocol for this clinical trial/vignette was used in telephone interviews with clinicians (n = 24) and in focus groups with potential participants (n = 13). Results: Planned sample size and data saturation was achieved for all groups except for focus groups with participants, as this had to be curtailed because of the COVID-19 pandemic and data saturation was not achieved. There was broad agreement from parents and health-care professionals that a trial is needed. The clinician survey demonstrated a variety of practice and opinion. The parent survey suggested that women and their families generally preferred vaginal birth at later gestations and caesarean section for preterm infants. The interactive workshop and Delphi consensus process confirmed the need for more evidence (hence the case for a trial) and provided rich information on what a future trial should entail. It was agreed that any trial should address the areas with most uncertainty, including the management of women at 26–32 weeks’ gestation, with either spontaneous preterm labour (cephalic presentation) or where preterm birth was medically indicated. Clear themes around the challenges inherent in conducting any trial emerged, including the concept of equipoise itself. Specific issues were as follows: different clinicians and participants would be in equipoise for each clinical scenario, effective conduct of the trial would require appropriate resources and expertise within the hospital conducting the trial, potential participants would welcome information on the trial well before the onset of labour and minority ethnic groups would require tailored approaches. Conclusion: Given the lack of evidence and the variation of practice and opinion in this area, and having listened to clinicians and potential participants, we conclude that a trial should be conducted and the outlined challenges resolved. Future work: The CASSAVA project could be used to inform the design of a randomised trial and indicates how such a trial could be carried out. Any future trial would benefit from a pilot with qualitative input and a study within a trial to inform optimal recruitment. Limitations: Certainty that a trial could be conducted can be determined only when it is attempted. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12295730. Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 61. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information

A qualitative study of nursing student experiences of clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Nursing student's experiences of their clinical practice provide greater insight to develop an effective clinical teaching strategy in nursing education. The main objective of this study was to investigate student nurses' experience about their clinical practice. METHODS: Focus groups were used to obtain students' opinion and experiences about their clinical practice. 90 baccalaureate nursing students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery) were selected randomly from two hundred students and were arranged in 9 groups of ten students. To analyze the data the method used to code and categories focus group data were adapted from approaches to qualitative data analysis. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from the focus group data. From the students' point of view," initial clinical anxiety", "theory-practice gap"," clinical supervision", professional role", were considered as important factors in clinical experience. CONCLUSION: The result of this study showed that nursing students were not satisfied with the clinical component of their education. They experienced anxiety as a result of feeling incompetent and lack of professional nursing skills and knowledge to take care of various patients in the clinical setting

Experiences of employment amongst young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative study

Purpose: This study explored expectations and experiences of employment amongst young people with JIAjuvenile idiopathic arthritis, and the role of health professionals in promoting positive employment outcomes. Methods: Semi-structured interviews (n=13) and three focus groups (n=9,n=4,n=3) were conducted with young people (16-25y) and adults (26-31y) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis JIA and semi-structured interviews (n=9) were conducted with health professionals. Transcripts were analysed thematically. Results: Young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritisJIA have concerns about employers’ attitudes towards employees with long-term health conditions and lack knowledge of antidiscrimination legislation. Young people not in education, employment or training identify arthritisJIA as a key barrier. Challenges associated with JIA arthritis (e.g. pain, psychological distress) may not be visible to employers. Decisions about disclosing arthritisJIA are challenging and cause anxiety. Young people associate good disease management and access to flexible and convenient care with their capacity to succeed in employment. Psycho-social and vocational interventions have benefited some young people, but are not routinely available. Conclusions: Low expectations of employers may affect young people’s decisions about disclosure and seeking appropriate support in the work place. Health professionals can equip young people with knowledge and skills to negotiate appropriate support, through signposting to Young people, employment and arthritis. 2 anti-discrimination information and offering practice of transferable skills such as disclosure in consultations

Brain antigens in functionally distinct antigen-presenting cell populations in cervical lymph nodes in MS and EAE

Drainage of central nervous system (CNS) antigens to the brain-draining cervical lymph nodes (CLN) is likely crucial in the initiation and control of autoimmune responses during multiple sclerosis (MS). We demonstrate neuronal antigens within CLN of MS patients. In monkeys and mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and in mouse models with non-inflammatory CNS damage, the type and extent of CNS damage was associated with the frequencies of CNS antigens within the cervical lymph nodes. In addition, CNS antigens drained to the spinal-cord-draining lumbar lymph nodes. In human MS CLN, neuronal antigens were present in pro-inflammatory antigen-presenting cells (APC), whereas the majority of myelin-containing cells were anti-inflammatory. This may reflect a different origin of the cells or different drainage mechanisms. Indeed, neuronal antigen-containing cells in human CLN did not express the lymph node homing receptor CCR7, whereas myelin antigen-containing cells in situ and in vitro did. Nevertheless, CLN from EAE-affected CCR7-deficient mice contained equal amounts of myelin and neuronal antigens as wild-type mice. We conclude that the type and frequencies of CNS antigens within the CLN are determined by the type and extent of CNS damage. Furthermore, the presence of myelin and neuronal antigens in functionally distinct APC populations within MS CLN suggests that differential immune responses can be evoked

Variation in the Glucose Transporter gene <i>SLC2A2 </i>is associated with glycaemic response to metformin

Metformin is the first-line antidiabetic drug with over 100 million users worldwide, yet its mechanism of action remains unclear1. Here the Metformin Genetics (MetGen) Consortium reports a three-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS), consisting of 13,123 participants of different ancestries. The C allele of rs8192675 in the intron of SLC2A2, which encodes the facilitated glucose transporter GLUT2, was associated with a 0.17% (P = 6.6 × 10−14) greater metformin-induced reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in 10,577 participants of European ancestry. rs8192675 was the top cis expression quantitative trait locus (cis-eQTL) for SLC2A2 in 1,226 human liver samples, suggesting a key role for hepatic GLUT2 in regulation of metformin action. Among obese individuals, C-allele homozygotes at rs8192675 had a 0.33% (3.6 mmol/mol) greater absolute HbA1c reduction than T-allele homozygotes. This was about half the effect seen with the addition of a DPP-4 inhibitor, and equated to a dose difference of 550 mg of metformin, suggesting rs8192675 as a potential biomarker for stratified medicine