Through the Looking Glass: Judicial Deference to Academic Decision-Making

This paper will review the statutory mandates of Section 504 and the ADA and examine the extent to which courts are willing to defer to institutional decisions concerning program modifications to accommodate learning disabled students. Courts have long recognized that academic decision-makers are entitled to deference, especially when their decisions concern issues related to educational programs. Courts must be vigilant, however, to properly weigh their role as the enforcers of Congressional legislation against the judicial policy of deference to academic decisions. Section I of this article will review the federal statutory and regulatory frameworks governing disability accommodations as they relate to institutions of higher education. Section II will address the potential conflict between essential program requirements in higher education and compliance with federal mandates. Section III will consider the federal courts\u27 deference to academic decision-makers, particularly with regard to granting or denying academic accommodations for persons with disabilities. Finally, Section IV will examine two cases that demonstrate the limits of the federal courts\u27 deference to academic decision-makers

Through the Looking Glass: Judicial Deference to Academic Decision-Making

This paper will review the statutory mandates of Section 504 and the ADA and examine the extent to which courts are willing to defer to institutional decisions concerning program modifications to accommodate learning disabled students. Courts have long recognized that academic decision-makers are entitled to deference, especially when their decisions concern issues related to educational programs. Courts must be vigilant, however, to properly weigh their role as the enforcers of Congressional legislation against the judicial policy of deference to academic decisions. Section I of this article will review the federal statutory and regulatory frameworks governing disability accommodations as they relate to institutions of higher education. Section II will address the potential conflict between essential program requirements in higher education and compliance with federal mandates. Section III will consider the federal courts\u27 deference to academic decision-makers, particularly with regard to granting or denying academic accommodations for persons with disabilities. Finally, Section IV will examine two cases that demonstrate the limits of the federal courts\u27 deference to academic decision-makers

Does Law School Curriculum Affect Bar Examination Passage? An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Which Were Related to Bar Examination Passage between 2001 and 2006 at a Midwestern Law School

Does Law School Curriculum Affect Bar Examination Passage? Abstract A quantitative, empirical study was undertaken to determine whether there was a relationship between the number of bar examination subject matter courses taken in law school and bar examination passage. Previous studies reported relationships between LSAT scores, undergraduate grade point averages (UGPA), law school class rank and bar examination passage. Many law schools are advocating or mandating that students with low class rank take upper division, bar examination subject matter courses in an effort to improve the bar examination passage rate for those students. This study examined all 2001-2005 graduates of Saint Louis University School of Law (n = 827) who took the Missouri bar examination as their first bar examination between 2001 and 2006. The study included 429 male and 398 females. Independent sample t-tests and binary logistic regression analysis were conducted using LSAT scores, UGPA and the mean number of upper division, bar examination subject matter courses as the independent variables and bar examination passage as the dependent variable. A statistically significant relationship using binary logistic regression was found between LSAT scores, UGPA, mean number of bar examination subject matter courses and bar examination passage in the study. However, the relationship between bar examination subject matter courses taken and bar examination passage was isolated to subjects who ranked in the third quartile of their graduating class. [passed (mean = 9.0301, SD 1.51927), failed (mean = 8.17060, SD 1.87060); t (197) = 2.913, p = .002] Binary logistic regression [z = 4.755, p = .029]. No statistically significant relationships were found between bar examination subject matter courses taken and bar examination passage for graduates ranked in the first, second or fourth quartiles of their graduating class. The authors conclude that mandating that students take more bar examination subject matter courses will not improve bar examination passage rates for at risk law school students who rank in the lowest quartile of their graduating class

Radiation-hard ASICs for optical data transmission in the ATLAS pixel detector

We have developed two radiation-hard ASICs for optical data transmission in the ATLAS pixel detector at the LHC at CERN: a driver chip for a Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (VCSEL) diode for 80 Mbit/s data transmission from the detector, and a Bi-Phase Mark decoder chip to recover the control data and 40 MHz clock received optically by a PIN diode. We have successfully implemented both ASICs in 0.25 um CMOS technology using enclosed layout transistors and guard rings for increased radiation hardness. We present results from prototype circuits and from irradiation studies with 24 GeV protons up to 57 Mrad (1.9 x 10e15 p/cm2).Comment: 8th Tropical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors, Siena, Italy (2002

SUPPLEMENTARY TECHNICAL BASIS FOR ASME SECTION XI CODE CASE N-597-2

ABSTRACT Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code provides rules and requirements for maintaining pressure boundary integrity of components, piping, and equipment during the life of a nuclear power plant. Code Case N-597-2 of Section XI, Requirements for Analytical Evaluation of Pipe Wall Thinning, provides evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria to justify continued operation of Class 1, 2 and 3 piping items subjected to wall thinning by a mechanism such as flow-accelerated corrosion. The acceptance criteria ensure that margins equivalent to those of the ASME B&PV Code are maintained. The technical basis for Code Case N-597-2 was previously presented at the 1999 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Since then, the ASME Section XI Working Group on Pipe Flaw Evaluation has identified the need for further explanation of the technical basis for the Code Case, such as the procedures for evaluation of wall thickness less than the Construction Code Design Pressure-based minimum allowable wall thickness, t min . This paper provides an additional description of the Code Case technical basis and validation against experimental and historic wall thinning events. NOMENCLATURE a = depth of an axial flaw A = reinforcement area required for a Class 1 pipe under internal pressure in accordance with rules in Section III of the ASME B&PV Code A i = predicted inside area of the cross-section of the pipe A o = total cross-sectional area of the pipe based on nominal outside diameter A p = predicted metal cross-sectional area of the pipe A rein = reinforcement area required for a Class 2 or 3 pipe under internal pressure in accordance with rules in Section III of the ASME B&PV Code B = parameter used to calculate maximum allowable length of an axial flaw in ANSI/ASME B31G d = distance from the center of a local thinned area defining the limits of reinforcement for Class 2 and 3 piping in accordance with the Construction Code D o = nominal outside diameter of the piping item f = stress range reduction factor for cyclic conditions for Class 2 and 3 piping i = stress intensification factor for Class 2 and 3 piping i 0 = stress intensification factor based on the design-basis geometry of the piping item k = constant used to describe the assumed linear increase in stress intensification factor i L = maximum extent of a local thinned area with t p < t nom L A = distance used to define limits of reinforcement for Class 1 piping in accordance with rules in Section III of the ASME B&PV Code L ax = maximum allowable length of an axial flaw from ANSI/ASME B31G L m = maximum extent of a local thinned area with t p < t min L m(a) = axial extent of a local thinned area with t p < t min L m(t) = transverse (circumferential) extent of a local thinned area with t p < t min M b = bending moment n = number of load cycles N = number of allowable load cycles N' = number of allowable load cycles corresponding to an assumed linear increase in stress intensification factor i N 0 = number of allowable load cycles based on the as-installed geometry of the piping item P = Design Pressure R = mean radius of the piping item based on nominal outside radius and nominal wall thickness R min = mean radius of the piping item based on nominal outside radius and t min s = stress range due to cyclic loading s 0 = stress range due to cyclic loading based on the design basis geometry of the piping item 1 Copyright © 2006 by ASME = predicted distribution of wall thickness at the end of the evaluation period t p,min = minimum predicted wall thickness at the end of the evaluation period y = factor required by the applicable piping Construction Code in the calculation of t min , and is equal to 0.4 Z min = predicted minimum section modulus of the thinned section of pipe δ = nominal distance between the center of the pipe and the neutral axis of the thinned pipe section σ

Liver and intestine transplantation

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73604/1/j.1600-6135.2004.00400.x.pd

Silent progression in disease activity-free relapsing multiple sclerosis.

ObjectiveRates of worsening and evolution to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) may be substantially lower in actively treated patients compared to natural history studies from the pretreatment era. Nonetheless, in our recently reported prospective cohort, more than half of patients with relapsing MS accumulated significant new disability by the 10th year of follow-up. Notably, "no evidence of disease activity" at 2 years did not predict long-term stability. Here, we determined to what extent clinical relapses and radiographic evidence of disease activity contribute to long-term disability accumulation.MethodsDisability progression was defined as an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 1.5, 1.0, or 0.5 (or greater) from baseline EDSS = 0, 1.0-5.0, and 5.5 or higher, respectively, assessed from baseline to year 5 (±1 year) and sustained to year 10 (±1 year). Longitudinal analysis of relative brain volume loss used a linear mixed model with sex, age, disease duration, and HLA-DRB1*15:01 as covariates.ResultsRelapses were associated with a transient increase in disability over 1-year intervals (p = 0.012) but not with confirmed disability progression (p = 0.551). Relative brain volume declined at a greater rate among individuals with disability progression compared to those who remained stable (p < 0.05).InterpretationLong-term worsening is common in relapsing MS patients, is largely independent of relapse activity, and is associated with accelerated brain atrophy. We propose the term silent progression to describe the insidious disability that accrues in many patients who satisfy traditional criteria for relapsing-remitting MS. Ann Neurol 2019;85:653-666

Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising

This paper argues that there has been a significant shift in advertising representations of women in recent years, such that rather than being presented as passive objects of the male gaze, young women in adverts are now frequently depicted as active, independent and sexually powerful. This analysis examines contemporary constructions of female sexual agency in advertisements examining three recognizable ‘figures’: the young, heterosexually desiring ‘midriff’, the vengeful woman set on punishing her partner or ex partner for his transgressions, and the ‘hot lesbian’, almost always entwined with her beautiful Other or double. Using recent examples of adverts the paper asks how this apparent ‘agency’ and ‘empowerment’ should be understood. Drawing on accounts of the incorporation or recuperation of feminist ideas in advertising the paper takes a critical approach to these representations, examining their exclusions, their constructions of gender relations and heteronormativity, and the way power is figured within them. A feminist poststructuralist approach is used to interrogate the way in which ‘sexual agency’ becomes a form of regulation in these adverts, that requires the re-moulding of feminine subjectivity to fit the current postfeminist, neoliberal moment in which young women should not only be beautiful but sexy, sexually knowledgeable/practised and always ‘up for it’. The paper makes an original contribution to debates about representations of gender in advertising, to poststructuralist analyses about the contemporary operation of power, and to writing about female ‘sexual agency’ by suggesting that ‘voice’ or ‘agency’ may not be the solution to the ‘missing discourse of female desire' but may in fact be a technology of discipline and regulation