The Promise and Pitfalls of Facebook Advertising: a Genetic Counselor’s Perspective

Facebook advertising is a powerful tool for increasing the outreach and recruitment of research participants. We describe our experience as genetic counselors within the context of an internet-based research study, recruiting subjects for a Parkinson disease (PD) biomarker study

Disclosure of individual research results at federally funded Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers

IntroductionThis study describes practices for disclosing individual research results to participants in Alzheimer’s disease research.MethodsAn online survey of clinical core leaders at National Institutes of Health‐funded Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers in the United States (response rate: 30/31, 97%) examined return of results practices across nine different types of research results.ResultsMost centers had returned consensus research diagnoses (83%) and neuropsychological test results (73%), with fewer having shared amyloid positron emission tomography (43%), tau imaging (10%), or apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype (7%) results. Centers reported having disclosed a mean of 3.1 types of results (standard deviation = 2.1; range 0–8). The most commonly cited reason for disclosure was to inform participants’ medical decision‐making (88%). Disclosure involved multiple professionals and modalities, with neurologists (87%) and in‐person visits (85%) most commonplace.DiscussionCenters varied widely as to whether and how they disclosed research results. Diagnostic and cognitive test results were more commonly returned than genetic or biomarker results.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170878/1/trc212213.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170878/2/trc212213_am.pd

Disclosure of individual research results at federally funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers

IntroductionThis study describes practices for disclosing individual research results to participants in Alzheimer's disease research.MethodsAn online survey of clinical core leaders at National Institutes of Health-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers in the United States (response rate: 30/31, 97%) examined return of results practices across nine different types of research results.ResultsMost centers had returned consensus research diagnoses (83%) and neuropsychological test results (73%), with fewer having shared amyloid positron emission tomography (43%), tau imaging (10%), or apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype (7%) results. Centers reported having disclosed a mean of 3.1 types of results (standard deviation = 2.1; range 0-8). The most commonly cited reason for disclosure was to inform participants' medical decision-making (88%). Disclosure involved multiple professionals and modalities, with neurologists (87%) and in-person visits (85%) most commonplace.DiscussionCenters varied widely as to whether and how they disclosed research results. Diagnostic and cognitive test results were more commonly returned than genetic or biomarker results

The Longitudinal Early- onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS): Framework and methodology

Patients with early- onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) are commonly excluded from large- scale observational and therapeutic studies due to their young age, atypical presentation, or absence of pathogenic mutations. The goals of the Longitudinal EOAD Study (LEADS) are to (1) define the clinical, imaging, and fluid biomarker characteristics of EOAD; (2) develop sensitive cognitive and biomarker measures for future clinical and research use; and (3) establish a trial- ready network. LEADS will follow 400 amyloid beta (Aβ)- positive EOAD, 200 Aβ- negative EOnonAD that meet National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer’s Association (NIA- AA) criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD dementia, and 100 age- matched controls. Participants will undergo clinical and cognitive assessments, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [18F]Florbetaben and [18F]Flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET), lumbar puncture, and blood draw for DNA, RNA, plasma, serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and post- mortem assessment. To develop more effective AD treatments, scientists need to understand the genetic, biological, and clinical processes involved in EOAD. LEADS will develop a public resource that will enable future planning and implementation of EOAD clinical trials.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171607/1/alz12350.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171607/2/alz12350_am.pd

The Longitudinal Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS): Framework and methodology.

Patients with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) are commonly excluded from large-scale observational and therapeutic studies due to their young age, atypical presentation, or absence of pathogenic mutations. The goals of the Longitudinal EOAD Study (LEADS) are to (1) define the clinical, imaging, and fluid biomarker characteristics of EOAD; (2) develop sensitive cognitive and biomarker measures for future clinical and research use; and (3) establish a trial-ready network. LEADS will follow 400 amyloid beta (Aβ)-positive EOAD, 200 Aβ-negative EOnonAD that meet National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD dementia, and 100 age-matched controls. Participants will undergo clinical and cognitive assessments, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [18 F]Florbetaben and [18 F]Flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET), lumbar puncture, and blood draw for DNA, RNA, plasma, serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and post-mortem assessment. To develop more effective AD treatments, scientists need to understand the genetic, biological, and clinical processes involved in EOAD. LEADS will develop a public resource that will enable future planning and implementation of EOAD clinical trials

The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia: Multidisciplinary and Open to All.

The brain changes of Alzheimer's disease and other degenerative dementias begin long before cognitive dysfunction develops, and in people with subtle cognitive complaints, clinicians often struggle to predict who will develop dementia. The public increasingly sees benefits to accessing dementia risk evidence (DRE) such as biomarkers, predictive algorithms, and genetic information, particularly as this information moves from research to demonstrated usefulness in guiding diagnosis and clinical management. For example, the knowledge that one has high levels of amyloid in the brain may lead one to seek amyloid reducing medications, plan for disability, or engage in health promoting behaviors to fight cognitive decline. Researchers often hesitate to share DRE data, either because they are insufficiently validated or reliable for use in individuals, or there are concerns about assuring responsible use and ensuring adequate understanding of potential problems when one's biomarker status is known. Concerns include warning people receiving DRE about situations in which they might be compelled to disclose their risk status potentially leading to discrimination or stigma. The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia (AGREEDementia) welcomes all concerned with how best to share and use DRE. Supporting understanding in clinicians, stakeholders, and people with or at risk for dementia and clearly delineating risks, benefits, and gaps in knowledge is vital. This brief overview describes elements that made this group effective as a model for other health conditions where there is interest in unfettered collaboration to discuss diagnostic uncertainty and the appropriate use and communication of health-related risk information

The formation of the advisory group on risk evaluation education for dementia

BackgroundWhen and how to communicate effectively the results of genetic and biomarker based prediction, detection, and quantification of the brain substrates of dementia involve important ethical and legal issues critical for precision medicine. The urgency of the issue has increased as People Living with Dementia (PLwD) and with Risk for Dementia (PwRD) can access direct to consumer genetic testing, amyloid targeting drugs, and clinical amyloid PET scans. To address the need for effective dissemination and consultation, an advisory group was convened that welcomes all interested members.MethodMembers attend two meetings monthly via phone/computer/WebEx. One meeting is a targeted working group that focuses on the following: 1. Symptomatic (PLwD), 2. Asymptomatic (PwRD), 3. Research, 4. Ethics/Healthcare Law, 5. Trainee/Mentorship. These discussion groups hear from and present to stakeholders (PLwD/PwRD/caregivers, professional organizations, companies) to solicit feedback on the efficacy of their efforts. Members also attend a monthly - all hands- meeting where they receive updates from other groups and hear presentations on emerging research and resources.ResultThe advisory group is composed of 104 members who represent advocacy/stakeholders (21%, e.g. professional organization representatives, (PLwD/PwRD/caregivers, FDA), academia (78%, e.g. university, funders, foundations), and healthcare law (1%). Professions include geneticists, genetic counsellors, researchers, clinicians, ethicists, and lawyers. Motivations for joining include improving communication in research and clinical contexts, mitigating potential negative impacts (e.g.emotional distress or discrimination), and protecting rights to know. Topics have included DTC genomics, the impact of APOE disclosure, genetics and personalized medicine, ecological momentary assessment of response to disclosure, and ethical issues in national and international research registries (EPAD). Activities included a survey on disclosure practices in NIA funded ADCs and collaborations with ADEAR. Stakeholders varied in concerns ranging from a need to protect patients from disclosure to a need to protect the right of access.ConclusionMembership is increasing and is engaging diverse specialties and stakeholders who provide education and consultation around communication and use of genetic and biomarkers related to dementia. The group structure and inclusion of members from multiple organizations supports open and free collaboration. Future efforts will be developing structured education for stakeholders and publications.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163965/1/alz045562.pd