Continuity Trumps Change: The First Year of Trump\u27s Administrative Presidency

From campaign rhetoric to tweets, President Trump has positioned himself as disrupter in chief, often pointing to administrative action as the avenue by which he is leaving a lasting mark. However, research on the administrative presidency begins with the premise that all presidents face incentives to use administrative tools to gain substantive or political traction. If, as this article suggests, Trump\u27s institutional standing differs little from his recent predecessors, then how much of the Trump presidency represents a change from past norms and practices\u27 How much represents continuity, or the perennial dynamics of a far-from-omnipotent executive in an ongoing world of separate institutions sharing powers (Neustadt 1990, 29)\u27 To answer this, we tracked presidential directives and regulatory policy during Trump\u27s first year in office. We found evidence of continuity, indicating that in its use of administrative tactics to shape policy, the Trump White House largely falls in line with recent presidencies

Entretien avec Andrew Rudalevige

Entretien réalisé par Vincent Michelot, Politique américaine, n°31, p. 45-58, 2018, URL : https://www.cairn.info/revue-politique-americaine-2018-2.html