Hypoxia induces differential translation of enolase/MBP-1

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hypoxic microenvironments in tumors contribute to transformation, which may alter metabolism, growth, and therapeutic responsiveness. The α-enolase gene encodes both a glycolytic enzyme (α-enolase) and a DNA-binding tumor suppressor protein, c-myc binding protein (MBP-1). These divergent α-enolase gene products play central roles in glucose metabolism and growth regulation and their differential regulation may be critical for tumor adaptation to hypoxia. We have previously shown that MBP-1 and its binding to the c-myc P₂promoter regulates the metabolic and cellular growth changes that occur in response to altered exogenous glucose concentrations.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>To examine the regulation of α-enolase and MBP-1 by a hypoxic microenvironment in breast cancer, MCF-7 cells were grown in low, physiologic, or high glucose under 1% oxygen. Our results demonstrate that adaptation to hypoxia involves attenuation of MBP-1 translation and loss of MBP-1-mediated regulation of c-myc transcription, evidenced by decreased MBP-1 binding to the c-myc P₂promoter. This allows for a robust increase in c-myc expression, "early c-myc response", which stimulates aerobic glycolysis resulting in tumor acclimation to oxidative stress. Increased α-enolase mRNA and preferential translation/post-translational modification may also allow for acclimatization to low oxygen, particularly under low glucose concentrations.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These results demonstrate that malignant cells adapt to hypoxia by modulating α-enolase/MBP-1 levels and suggest a mechanism for tumor cell induction of the hyperglycolytic state. This important "feedback" mechanism may help transformed cells to escape the apoptotic cascade, allowing for survival during limited glucose and oxygen availability.</p

Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease

We identified rare coding variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in a 3-stage case-control study of 85,133 subjects. In stage 1, 34,174 samples were genotyped using a whole-exome microarray. In stage 2, we tested associated variants (P<1×10-4) in 35,962 independent samples using de novo genotyping and imputed genotypes. In stage 3, an additional 14,997 samples were used to test the most significant stage 2 associations (P<5×10-8) using imputed genotypes. We observed 3 novel genome-wide significant (GWS) AD associated non-synonymous variants; a protective variant in PLCG2 (rs72824905/p.P522R, P=5.38×10-10, OR=0.68, MAFcases=0.0059, MAFcontrols=0.0093), a risk variant in ABI3 (rs616338/p.S209F, P=4.56×10-10, OR=1.43, MAFcases=0.011, MAFcontrols=0.008), and a novel GWS variant in TREM2 (rs143332484/p.R62H, P=1.55×10-14, OR=1.67, MAFcases=0.0143, MAFcontrols=0.0089), a known AD susceptibility gene. These protein-coding changes are in genes highly expressed in microglia and highlight an immune-related protein-protein interaction network enriched for previously identified AD risk genes. These genetic findings provide additional evidence that the microglia-mediated innate immune response contributes directly to AD development

A novel Alzheimer disease locus located near the gene encoding tau protein

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this recordAPOE ε4, the most significant genetic risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD), may mask effects of other loci. We re-analyzed genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP) Consortium in APOE ε4+ (10 352 cases and 9207 controls) and APOE ε4- (7184 cases and 26 968 controls) subgroups as well as in the total sample testing for interaction between a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and APOE ε4 status. Suggestive associations (P<1 × 10-4) in stage 1 were evaluated in an independent sample (stage 2) containing 4203 subjects (APOE ε4+: 1250 cases and 536 controls; APOE ε4-: 718 cases and 1699 controls). Among APOE ε4- subjects, novel genome-wide significant (GWS) association was observed with 17 SNPs (all between KANSL1 and LRRC37A on chromosome 17 near MAPT) in a meta-analysis of the stage 1 and stage 2 data sets (best SNP, rs2732703, P=5·8 × 10-9). Conditional analysis revealed that rs2732703 accounted for association signals in the entire 100-kilobase region that includes MAPT. Except for previously identified AD loci showing stronger association in APOE ε4+ subjects (CR1 and CLU) or APOE ε4- subjects (MS4A6A/MS4A4A/MS4A6E), no other SNPs were significantly associated with AD in a specific APOE genotype subgroup. In addition, the finding in the stage 1 sample that AD risk is significantly influenced by the interaction of APOE with rs1595014 in TMEM106B (P=1·6 × 10-7) is noteworthy, because TMEM106B variants have previously been associated with risk of frontotemporal dementia. Expression quantitative trait locus analysis revealed that rs113986870, one of the GWS SNPs near rs2732703, is significantly associated with four KANSL1 probes that target transcription of the first translated exon and an untranslated exon in hippocampus (P≤1.3 × 10-8), frontal cortex (P≤1.3 × 10-9) and temporal cortex (P≤1.2 × 10-11). Rs113986870 is also strongly associated with a MAPT probe that targets transcription of alternatively spliced exon 3 in frontal cortex (P=9.2 × 10-6) and temporal cortex (P=2.6 × 10-6). Our APOE-stratified GWAS is the first to show GWS association for AD with SNPs in the chromosome 17q21.31 region. Replication of this finding in independent samples is needed to verify that SNPs in this region have significantly stronger effects on AD risk in persons lacking APOE ε4 compared with persons carrying this allele, and if this is found to hold, further examination of this region and studies aimed at deciphering the mechanism(s) are warranted

Pharmacological Manipulation of Reward Magnitude in a Behavioral Contrast Design

Program year: 1979-1980Digitized from print original stored in HDRIntracranial electrical stimulation of the brain can serve as a reward when administered to certain areas in and around the hypothalamus. These stimulation sites seem to be associated with major catecholamine (CA) pathways. On the basis of this information, and considering the fact that behavior induced by rewarding brain stimulation (RBS) resembles that produced by food, water or sex, it has been postulated that natural rewards may be mediated by one or more catecholamine neurotransmitters as well. In an attempt to demonstrate that RBS and natural rewards share a common neurochemical basis, we observed the effects of a CA agonist, apomorphine, and a CA antagonist, haloperidol, on runway performance in a behavioral contrast design. Behavioral contrast effects occur when an animal, working for a certain reward magnitude, is suddenly shifted to a new reward magnitude. If the new magnitude of reward is higher than before, (+) contrast occurs; the animal shows disproportionately high rates of responding. If the new reward magnitude is lower than before, (-) contrast occurs and the animal shows disproportionately low rates of responding. If natural reward is mediated by CA fibers, then contrast effects should occur following the injection of CA agonists or antagonists, even though the magnitude of the reward thay are receiving has not been changed. Changes in central CA activity would have altered the animals' subjective perception of the reward, and they would behave accordingly. Contrast effects are commonly evaluated with various behavioral tests, such as the straight alley maze used here, which involve complex voluntary motor skills. Behavioral test results can be confounded by performance variables, such as drug induced changes in the CA activity of the substantia nigra, which influence the animal's motor functions. Therefore, before runway performance was observed for contrast effects under the influence of dopaminergic drugs, control subjects were given two tests designed to identify possible performance deficits, an open field test, and swimming tests of success and vigor. Neither haloperidol, nor apomorphine injected rats differed significantly from saline controls on either measure. In the straight alley maze, haloperidol, a dopamine antagonist, produced significant reductions in run speeds (- contrast) using a saccharin reward. Apomorphine, a dopamine agonist, increased run speeds (+ contrast). It was concluded, therefore, that subjective reward magnitudes of a natural reward can be manipulated by the same drugs which influence the behavioral effects of RBS, without inducing performance deficits. This supports the hypothesis that both RBS and natural rewards are madiated by the same dopaminergic reward system. These resultshave applications in the control of obesity, over-smoking, and endogenous depression. Further research using a behavioral contrast design in connection with other natural rewards is needed to discount the possible influence of confounding secondary variables such as "taste"