C1-inhibitor in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: beneficial effect on renal dysfunction

To investigate the efficacy and the safety of the parenteral administration of C1-inhibitor to patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Double blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial. Surgical and medical intensive care units of a tertiary care university hospital. Forty consecutive patients (20 C1-inhibitor/20 placebo) who entered the intensive care unit with severe sepsis or septic shock. C1-inhibitor intravenously in a 1-hr infusion, starting with 6000 IU, followed by 3000 IU, 2000 IU, and 1000 IU at 12-hr intervals, compared with placebo. C1-inhibitor administration significantly increased plasma C1-inhibitor antigen and activity levels during days 1-4 (p <.007). Patients in the C1-inhibitor group had significantly lower serum creatinine concentrations on day 3 (p =.048) and 4 (p =.01) than placebo patients. Multiple organ dysfunction assessed by logistic organ dysfunction and sepsis-related organ failure assessment scores was less pronounced in patients treated with C1-inhibitor. Mortality rate was similar in both groups. There were no C1-inhibitor-related side effects. C1-inhibitor administration attenuated renal impairment in patients with severe sepsis or septic shoc

Reducing Aerosol-Related Risk of Transmission in the Era of COVID-19: An Interim Guidance Endorsed by the International Society of Aerosols in Medicine

International audienc

Reducing aerosol-related risk of transmission in the era of COVID-19: an interim guidance endorsed by the International Society of Aerosols in Medicine

National and international guidelines recommend droplet/airborne transmission and contact precautions for those caring for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in ambulatory and acute care settings. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, an acute respiratory infectious agent, is primarily transmitted between people through respiratory droplets and contact routes. A recognized key to transmission of COVID-19, and droplet infections generally, is the dispersion of bioaerosols from the patient. Increased risk of transmission has been associated with aerosol generating procedures that include endotracheal intubation, bronchoscopy, open suctioning, administration of nebulized treatment, manual ventilation before intubation, turning the patient to the prone position, disconnecting the patient from the ventilator, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, tracheostomy, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The knowledge that COVID-19 subjects can be asymptomatic and still shed virus, producing infectious droplets during breathing, suggests that health care workers (HCWs) should assume every patient is potentially infectious during this pandemic. Taking actions to reduce risk of transmission to HCWs is, therefore, a vital consideration for safe delivery of all medical aerosols. Guidelines for use of personal protective equipment (glove, gowns, masks, shield, and/or powered air purifying respiratory) during high-risk procedures are essential and should be considered for use with lower risk procedures such as administration of uncontaminated medical aerosols. Bioaerosols generated by infected patients are a major source of transmission for SARS CoV-2, and other infectious agents. In contrast, therapeutic aerosols do not add to the risk of disease transmission unless contaminated by patients or HCWs