Information Aggregation and Innovation in Market Design

The literature on information aggregation predicts that market growth unambiguously reduces uncertainty about the value of traded goods. The results were developed within the classical model, which assumes that traders’ values for the exchanged good are determined by fundamental (common) shocks. At the same time, design innovation in contemporaneous markets seems to exploit demand interdependence among agents with similar tastes or common information sharing (e.g., Facebook ads, the practice of customer targeting). This paper demonstrates that with heterogeneous interdependence among agents’ values or noise in signals about values, opportunities to innovate in smaller or less connected (in the network-theoretic sense) markets may dominate those in larger or better connected markets

Bundling without Price Discrimination

This paper examines the optimal bundling strategies of a multiproduct monopoly in markets in which a seller cannot monitor and thereby restrict the purchases of buyers to a single bundle, while buyers have resale opportunities. In such markets, the standard mechanism through which bundling increases seller profits, based on price discrimination, is not feasible. The profit-maximizing bundling strategy is characterized, given the restrictions on pricing policies resulting from resale and a lack of monitoring. The welfare implications of optimal bundling are analyzed.Bundling ; Pricing ; Revenue Maximization ; Product Design JEL Codes: D42 ; L12

Bundling without price discrimination

This paper examines the optimal bundling strategies of a multiproduct monopoly in markets in which a seller cannot monitor and thereby restrict the purchases of buyers to a single bundle, while buyers have resale opportunities. In such markets, the standard mechanism through which bundling increases seller profits, based on price discrimination, is not feasible. The profit-maximizing bundling strategy is characterized, given the restrictions on pricing policies resulting from resale and a lack of monitoring. The welfare implications of optimal bundling are analyzed

Cooperation in anonymous dynamic social networks

Abstract We study the extent to which cooperative behavior can be sustained in large, anonymous, evolving social networks. Individuals strategically form relationships under a social matching protocol and engage in prisoner's dilemma interactions with their partners. We characterize a class of equilibria that support cooperation as a stationary outcome. When cooperation is possible, its level is uniquely determined. While neither community enforcement nor contagion mechanisms have force in our setting, the endogenous dynamics of the social network imply that cooperation allows an individual to gradually accumulate a large network of profitable interactions, while defection results in social marginalization. Even as players become perfectly patient, equilibrium allows for full cooperation, only autarky, or the coexistence of cooperation and defection, depending on payoffs. Smaller levels of cooperation can be sustained by a form of exclusivity among cooperators. * We than