Excellent outcomes of 2G-TKI therapy after imatinib failure in chronic phase CML patients

Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2G-TKIs) dasatinib and nilotinib produced historical rates of about 50% complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and about 40% major molecular response (MMR) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients failing imatinib. Direct comparisons between dasatinib and nilotinib are lacking, and few studies addressed the dynamics of deep molecular response (DMR) in a "real-life" setting. We retrospectively analyzed 163 patients receiving dasatinib (n= 95) or nilotinib (n= 68) as second-line therapy after imatinib. The two cohorts were comparable for disease's characteristics, although there was a higher rate of dasatinib use in imatinib-resistant and of nilotinib in intolerant patients. Overall, 75% patients not in CCyR and 60% patients not in MMR at 2G-TKI start attained this response. DMR was achieved by 61 patients (37.4%), with estimated rate of stable DMR at 5 years of 24%. After a median follow-up of 48 months, 60% of patients persisted on their second-line treatment. Rates and kinetics of cytogenetic and molecular responses, progression-free and overall survival were similar for dasatinib and nilotinib. In a "real-life" setting, dasatinib and nilotinib resulted equally effective and safe after imatinib failure, determining high rates of CCyR and MMR, and a significant chance of stable DMR, a prerequisite for treatment discontinuation

Determinants of frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor choice for patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: A study from the Registro Italiano LMC and Campus CML

Background: Imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved in Italy for frontline treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). The choice of TKI is based on a combined evaluation of the patient's and the disease characteristics. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of frontline TKI therapy in an unselected cohort of Italian patients with CP-CML to correlate the choice with the patient's features. Methods: A total of 1967 patients with CP-CML diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 at 36 centers throughout Italy were retrospectively evaluated; 1089 patients (55.4%) received imatinib and 878 patients (44.6%) received a second-generation (2G) TKI. Results: Second-generation TKIs were chosen for most patients aged <45 years (69.2%), whereas imatinib was used in 76.7% of patients aged >65 years (p < .001). There was a predominant use of imatinib in intermediate/high European long-term survival risk patients (60.0%/66.0% vs. 49.7% in low-risk patients) and a limited use of 2G-TKIs in patients with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous neoplasms, ischemic heart disease, or stroke and in those with >3 concomitant drugs. We observed a greater use of imatinib (61.1%) in patients diagnosed in 2018-2019 compared to 2012-2017 (53.2%; p = .002). In multivariable analysis, factors correlated with imatinib use were age > 65 years, spleen size, the presence of comorbidities, and ≥3 concomitant medications. Conclusions: This observational study of almost 2000 cases of CML shows that imatinib is the frontline drug of choice in 55% of Italian patients with CP-CML, with 2G-TKIs prevalently used in younger patients and in those with no concomitant clinical conditions. Introduction of the generic formulation in 2018 seems to have fostered imatinib use

Managing chronic myeloid leukemia for treatment-free remission: a proposal from the GIMEMA CML WP

Several papers authored by international experts have proposed recommendations on the management of BCR-ABL1+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Following these recommendations, survival of CML patients has become very close to normal. The next, ambitious, step is to bring as many patients as possible into a condition of treatment-free remission (TFR). The Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA; Italian Group for Hematologic Diseases of the Adult) CML Working Party (WP) has developed a project aimed at selecting the treatment policies that may increase the probability of TFR, taking into account 4 variables: the need for TFR, the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the characteristics of leukemia, and the patient. A Delphi-like method was used to reach a consensus among the representatives of 50 centers of the CML WP. A consensus was reached on the assessment of disease risk (EUTOS Long Term Survival [ELTS] score), on the definition of the most appropriate age boundaries for the choice of first-line treatment, on the choice of the TKI for first-line treatment, and on the definition of the responses that do not require a change of the TKI (BCR-ABL1 6410% at 3 months, 641% at 6 months, 640.1% at 12 months, 640.01% at 24 months), and of the responses that require a change of the TKI, when the goal is TFR (BCR-ABL1 >10% at 3 and 6 months, >1% at 12 months, and >0.1% at 24 months). These suggestions may help optimize the treatment strategy for TFR

MODERN IMMUNOTHERAPY OF ADULT B-LINEAGE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA WITH MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR MODIFIED T CELLS

The introduction of newer cytotoxic monoclonal antibodies and the chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cells is opening a new age in the management of B-lineage adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This therapeutic change must be very positively acknowledged because of the limits of intensive chemotherapy programs and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. With these traditional therapeutic tools in fact cure can be achieve in only 40-50% of the patients, with higher failure rates in the elderly, in those with post-induction persistence of minimal residual disease and especially in refractory/relapsed disease. The place of the novel immunotherapeutics in improving the outcome of adult patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia is reviewed

EUTOS score predicts long-term outcome but not optimal response to imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia

To test the recently developed EUTOS score in predicting optimal response to imatinib and the long-term outcome, 265 patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia treated with standard dose imatinib were analysed. Achievement of optimal response endpoints were higher in low-risk patients, though the difference was not statistically significant: PCyR at 6th month 86% vs 67% (p=0.06), CCyR at 12th month 80% vs 63% (p=0.09), MMR at 18th month 61% vs 36% (p=0.11). However, EUTOS score was predictive for the long-term response. With a median follow-up of 61 months, 53% high-risk patients experienced imatinib failure, compared to 23% in the low-risk group (p=0.013). Among high-risk patients, 4/17 (23%) progressed to accelerated/blastic phase or died, compared to 11/248 (5%) low-risk patients, with 5-year progression-free survival rates of 84\ub110% and 96\ub11%, respectively (p=0.04). Our data confirm that EUTOS score envisions the long-term outcome of imatinib therapy

3-YEARS and Beyond Study Completion Results of the Otpkima Randomized Clinical Trial in Elderly CML Patients

The goal of Treatment Free Remission (TFR) is achievable in no more than 25-30% of patients with Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs). Thus, for the great majority of patients, particularly for the elderly, the options are to continue TKI therapy life-long or to enter an intermittent TKI administration, as previously published ( Russo D et al, Blood 2013; Russo et al Blood Adv 2015). The probability of major molecular response (MMR or MR3.0) maintenance while on intermittent 1 month on/1 month off TKI at 1 year is 80%, as reported recently in the first interime analysis of the Italian prospective randomized OPTkIMA trial (Malagola M et al, Cancer Med 2021). This is the second interim report of OPTkIMA trial, in which elderly patients with Ph+ CML in sustained (≥ 2 years) confirmed major molecular response (MMR or MR3.0) or deep molecular response (MR4.0 or deeper) were randomly assigned to receive a FIXED intermittent schedule (1 month on/1 month off) vs a PROGRESSIVE intermittent schedule (1 month on/1 month off for the 1 st year, 1 month on/2 months off for the 2 nd year, 1 month on/3 months off for the 3 rd year). After the 3 rd year, clinicians were free to decide if maintain the intermittent schedule, discontinue TKI or resume TKI daily ( Malagola M et al, Cancer Med 2021). At last follow up, 203 patients are evaluable after randomization (104 FIXED vs 99 PROGRESSIVE). At 3 rd year (end of study protocol), by intention to treat, 28/104 (27%) and 45/99 (45%) patients discontinued OPTkIMA because of MR3.0 loss in the FIXED vs PROGRESSIVE arm, respectively (p=0.005). The percentages of patients who discontinued OPTkIMA because of MR3.0 loss at 1 st, 2 nd and 3 rd year in the FIXED vs PROGRESSIVE arm were: 24% in both arms (p=0.97), 1% vs 22% (p=0.001) and 3% vs 15% (p=0.01), respectively (Figure 1). The probability of survival without MR3.0 loss at 1, 2 and 3 years in the FIXED vs PROGRESSIVE arm were: 81%, 69% and 66% vs 81%, 59% and 53%, respectively (Figure 2; p=0.13). None of the patients who lost MR3.0 progressed to accelerated or blastic phase (AP/BP) and all of the patients regained the MR3.0 after continuous TKI resumption within 9 months. At the end of the 3 rd year from randomization, 61/104 (59%) and 36/99 (36%) patients were in MR3.0 or deeper response in the FIXED vs PROGRESSIVE arm, respectively (p=0.001). For these patients, comparing the two arms, Clinicians' choice was to maintain the ongoing intermittent schedule in 46% vs 28% of the cases (p=0.01), discontinue TKI with the goal of TFR in 36% vs 58% (p=0.03), and resume the TKI continuously in 18% vs 14% of the patients (p=0.59). The results of the OPTkIMA trial clearly confirm that a policy of intermittent TKI administration in elderly patients with Ph+ CML in MR3.0 or deeper response is safe, as no progression to AP/BP was observed. Furthermore, the great majority of protocol discontinuation for MR3.0 loss were recorded in the 1 st year (one month on and one month off in both arms). Then the cumulative incidence of patients who lost MR3.0 beyond the 1 st year was significantly higher in the PROGRESSIVE arm with a trend towards a higher probability of survival without MR3.0 loss in the FIXED arm (Figure 1). Finally, at the end of the study protocol (3 rd year), patients in MR3.0 or deeper response after a FIXED intermittent schedule were more likely addressed to maintain the same program, whereas patients included in the PROGRESSIVE arm were more frequently discontinued with the goal of TFR. This last observation represents a “real-life” CML management by Clinicians. It suggests that after a PROGRESSIVE intermittent therapy, patients were considered at high probability to safely maintain the TFR