Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: Results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial

ObjectiveTo investigate the optimum conduit for coronary targets other than the left anterior descending artery, we evaluated long-term patencies and clinical outcomes of the radial artery, right internal thoracic artery, and saphenous vein through the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial.MethodsAs part of a 10-year prospective, randomized, single-center trial, patients undergoing primary coronary surgery were allocated to the radial artery (n = 198) or free right internal thoracic artery (n = 196) if aged less than 70 years (group 1), or radial artery (n = 113) or saphenous vein (n = 112) if aged at least 70 years (group 2). All patients received a left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending, and the randomized conduit was used to graft the second largest target. Protocol-directed angiography has been performed at randomly assigned intervals, weighted toward the end of the study period. Grafts are defined as failed if there was occlusion, string sign, or greater than 80% stenosis, independently reported by 3 assessors. Analysis is by intention to treat.ResultsAt mean follow up of 5.5 years, protocol angiography has been performed in groups 1 and 2 in 237 and 113 patients, respectively. There are no significant differences within each group in preoperative comorbidity, age, or urgency. Patencies were similar for either of the 2 conduits in each group (log rank analysis, P = .06 and P = .54, respectively). The differences in estimated 5-year patencies were 6.6% (radial minus right internal thoracic artery) in group 1 and 2.9% (radial minus saphenous vein graft) in group 2.ConclusionAt mean 5-year angiography in largely asymptomatic patients, the selection of arterial or venous conduit for the second graft has not significantly affected patency. This finding offers surgeons, for now, enhanced flexibility in planning revascularization

Predicting adverse outcomes in elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery using pre-operative troponin I levels

Background: Cardiac troponins are frequently measured as part of the pre-operative work-up of patients prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). The utility of measuring these levels in elective patients, and the clinical implication of an abnormal result are unclear. The following study investigates the relationship between cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measured as part of a routine pre-operative work-up and outcomes following CABG. Methods: From January 2010 to December 2012, 378 patients underwent isolated, elective CABG and had cTnI measured prospectively, as part of their pre-operative work-up. Patients were divided into normal (Group I) and elevated (Group II) cTnI groups. Pre-operative, operative and post-operative data were obtained from our institution's prospectively collected database. Results: Elevated cTnI was present in 47 patients (12.4%) pre-operatively. Intra-operative variables did not differ between the elevated cTnI and control groups. Both 30-day mortality (Group I: 0.9% v Group II: 6.4%, p=0.03) and cardiac arrest (Group I: 1.5% v Group II: 8.5%, p=0.01) were significantly more frequent in the elevated cTnI group. In multivariable analysis, elevated cTnI remained a predictor for cardiac arrest (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.2 – 29.2). Conclusions: Patients presenting for elective CABG frequently have elevated cTnI on pre-operative work-up. These patients may be at a greater risk of 30-day mortality and cardiac arrest. Routine pre-operative measurement of cTnI may alert clinicians to a higher operative risk

The right internal thoracic artery graft - benefits of grafting the left coronary system and native vessels with a high grade stenosis

Brian F. Buxton, Permyos Ruengsakulrach, John Fuller, Alexander Rosalion, Christopher M. Reid and James Tatouli

Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery using Pre-operative Troponin I Levels

Background: Cardiac troponins are frequently measured as part of the pre-operative work-up of patients prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). The utility of measuring these levels in elective patients, and the clinical implication of an abnormal result are unclear. The following study investigates the relationship between cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measured as part of a routine pre-operative work-up and outcomes following CABG. Methods: From January 2010 to December 2012, 378 patients underwent isolated, elective CABG and had cTnI measured prospectively, as part of their pre-operative work-up. Patients were divided into normal (Group I) and elevated (Group II) cTnI groups. Pre-operative, operative and post-operative data were obtained from our institution's prospectively collected database. Results: Elevated cTnI was present in 47 patients (12.4%) pre-operatively. Intra-operative variables did not differ between the elevated cTnI and control groups. Both 30-day mortality (Group I: 0.9% v Group II: 6.4%, p=0.03) and cardiac arrest (Group I: 1.5% v Group II: 8.5%, p=0.01) were significantly more frequent in the elevated cTnI group. In multivariable analysis, elevated cTnI remained a predictor for cardiac arrest (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.2 – 29.2). Conclusions: Patients presenting for elective CABG frequently have elevated cTnI on pre-operative work-up. These patients may be at a greater risk of 30-day mortality and cardiac arrest. Routine pre-operative measurement of cTnI may alert clinicians to a higher operative risk

Short- and midterm outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery performed by surgeons in training

Objective: The effect of training on outcomes in cardiac surgery is poorly studied. We aimed to study the results of coronary artery bypass grafting procedures performed by surgeons in training across our state with respect to short- and midterm postoperative outcomes. Methods: All coronary artery bypass grafting surgeries performed by trainee surgeons between July 2001 and December 2006 were compared with those performed by consultant surgeons using mandatory prospectively collected statewide data. Early mortality; prolonged ventilation or intensive care unit stay; return to operating theater for bleeding, stroke, myocardial infarction, or renal failure; and 5-year survival were compared using propensity score analysis. Results: A total of 7745 surgeries were included in this study. Trainees performed 983 (13%) surgeries. Trainee surgeries had longer perfusion and crossclamp times. Crude early postoperative outcomes were similar between trainee and consultant surgeries. After propensity score adjustment, early outcomes remained similar, with the exception of myocardial infarction (0.8% in trainee surgeries vs 0.4% in consultant surgeries, P = .046). Adjusted 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were similar between trainee and consultant surgeries: 95.3% versus 95.5%, 90.8% versus 92.0%, and 86.3% versus 87.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Coronary artery bypass grafting performed by trainee surgeons within a supervised program is safe with acceptable short- and midterm outcomes. © 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery