Plantas de cobertura e qualidade química de latossolo Amarelo sob plantio direto no cerrado Maranhense

Aiming to evaluate the effect of cover plants over soil chemical attributes in the region of Balsas - Maranhão, samples of Oxisol under plant cover of millet [Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke], brachiaria (Brachiaria ruziziensis) and native Cerrado (mid-sized), were collected in three depths (0-0.10; 0.10-0.20 and 0.20-0.40 m). Plant cover of millet and brachiaria promoted an increase in soil pH and reductions in amounts of Al3+ and in saturation by Al3+, in relation to the area with native Cerrado. Major amounts of residue were verified on soil surface under native cerrado, due to greater input of plant residue and lower decomposition rate. Amounts of nutrients and levels of organic matter were higher in areas under millet and brachiaria cover, mainly in 0-0.10 e 0.10-0.20 m. depths. Brachiaria and millet cover plants were similar in relation to alterations promoted in chemical attributes of soil

Prediction of Soil Erodibility by Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy in a Neotropical Dry Forest Biome

The USLE and the RUSLE are two common erosion prediction models that are used worldwide, and soil erodibility (K-factor) is one parameter used to calculate them. The objectives of this study were to investigate the variability of soil-erodibility factors under different soil-texture classes and evaluate the efficiency of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) in the near-infrared range at predicting the USLE and RUSLE K-factors using a partial least squares regression analysis. The study was conducted in Fluvisols in dry tropical forest (the Caatinga). Sampling was undertaken in the first 20 cm of soil at 80 sites distributed 15 m apart on a 70 m × 320 m spatial grid. Results show that the clay fraction is represented mainly by 2:1 phyllosilicates. Soil organic matter content is low (2adj = 0.53; RMSE = 8.37 10−3 t h MJ−1 mm−1) and RUSLE (R2adj = 0.58; RMSE = 6.78 10−3 t h MJ−1 mm−1) K-factors

Prediction of Soil Erodibility by Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy in a Neotropical Dry Forest Biome

The USLE and the RUSLE are two common erosion prediction models that are used worldwide, and soil erodibility (K-factor) is one parameter used to calculate them. The objectives of this study were to investigate the variability of soil-erodibility factors under different soil-texture classes and evaluate the efficiency of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) in the near-infrared range at predicting the USLE and RUSLE K-factors using a partial least squares regression analysis. The study was conducted in Fluvisols in dry tropical forest (the Caatinga). Sampling was undertaken in the first 20 cm of soil at 80 sites distributed 15 m apart on a 70 m × 320 m spatial grid. Results show that the clay fraction is represented mainly by 2:1 phyllosilicates. Soil organic matter content is low (<0.2%), which is typical of tropical dry forests, and this is reflected in the high values of the calculated USLE and RUSLE K-factors. An empirical semivariogram was used to investigate the spatial dependence of both K-factors. Pedometric modeling showed that DRS can be used to predict both USLE (R2adj = 0.53; RMSE = 8.37 10−3 t h MJ−1 mm−1) and RUSLE (R2adj = 0.58; RMSE = 6.78 10−3 t h MJ−1 mm−1) K-factors

Compressibilidade do solo e sistema radicular da cana‑de‑açúcar em manejo com e sem controle de tráfego

O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar a capacidade de suporte de carga do solo em área com cana‑de‑açúcar colhida mecanicamente sem queima, em sistemas de manejo com e sem controle de tráfego agrícola. O controle de tráfego foi feito com ajuste da bitola do trator e transbordo, ou com ajuste da bitola e uso de piloto automático. As amostras de solo foram coletadas em cilindros volumétricos, na soqueira e na entrelinha da cultura (linha de rodado), nas camadas de 0,00-0,10 e 0,20-0,30 m. Avaliou-se a densidade radicular por meio de imagens, obtidas da digitalização de raízes coletadas em monólitos de 0,25x0,10x0,10 m. O manejo sem controle de tráfego apresentou maior capacidade de suporte de carga do solo na linha de plantio, nas duas camadas de solo avaliadas, o que indicou maior compactação. Maior densidade radicular ocorreu no manejo com controle de tráfego com ajuste da bitola e piloto automático, que permitiu maior capacidade de suporte de carga na linha de rodado e preservou a qualidade estrutural na região da soqueira, com reflexo positivo sobre o desenvolvimento do sistema radicular da cana‑de‑açúcar

Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease

BACKGROUND Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, whether clinical outcomes are better in those who receive an invasive intervention plus medical therapy than in those who receive medical therapy alone is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia to an initial invasive strategy (angiography and revascularization when feasible) and medical therapy or to an initial conservative strategy of medical therapy alone and angiography if medical therapy failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. A key secondary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction. RESULTS Over a median of 3.2 years, 318 primary outcome events occurred in the invasive-strategy group and 352 occurred in the conservative-strategy group. At 6 months, the cumulative event rate was 5.3% in the invasive-strategy group and 3.4% in the conservative-strategy group (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 3.0); at 5 years, the cumulative event rate was 16.4% and 18.2%, respectively (difference, 121.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 124.7 to 1.0). Results were similar with respect to the key secondary outcome. The incidence of the primary outcome was sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction; a secondary analysis yielded more procedural myocardial infarctions of uncertain clinical importance. There were 145 deaths in the invasive-strategy group and 144 deaths in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death from any cause over a median of 3.2 years. The trial findings were sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction that was used

Health-status outcomes with invasive or conservative care in coronary disease

BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA trial, an invasive strategy with angiographic assessment and revascularization did not reduce clinical events among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and moderate or severe ischemia. A secondary objective of the trial was to assess angina-related health status among these patients. METHODS We assessed angina-related symptoms, function, and quality of life with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at randomization, at months 1.5, 3, and 6, and every 6 months thereafter in participants who had been randomly assigned to an invasive treatment strategy (2295 participants) or a conservative strategy (2322). Mixed-effects cumulative probability models within a Bayesian framework were used to estimate differences between the treatment groups. The primary outcome of this health-status analysis was the SAQ summary score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status). All analyses were performed in the overall population and according to baseline angina frequency. RESULTS At baseline, 35% of patients reported having no angina in the previous month. SAQ summary scores increased in both treatment groups, with increases at 3, 12, and 36 months that were 4.1 points (95% credible interval, 3.2 to 5.0), 4.2 points (95% credible interval, 3.3 to 5.1), and 2.9 points (95% credible interval, 2.2 to 3.7) higher with the invasive strategy than with the conservative strategy. Differences were larger among participants who had more frequent angina at baseline (8.5 vs. 0.1 points at 3 months and 5.3 vs. 1.2 points at 36 months among participants with daily or weekly angina as compared with no angina). CONCLUSIONS In the overall trial population with moderate or severe ischemia, which included 35% of participants without angina at baseline, patients randomly assigned to the invasive strategy had greater improvement in angina-related health status than those assigned to the conservative strategy. The modest mean differences favoring the invasive strategy in the overall group reflected minimal differences among asymptomatic patients and larger differences among patients who had had angina at baseline