Improving assessment and management of pain in hemophilia. An Italian Delphi consensus statement

: Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines and well-validated assessment scales for pain in people with hemophilia (PwH) are needed. Here, we report 28 statements covering five topics on pain assessment and management in pediatric and adult PwH that were developed by 60 Italian hemophilia specialists during a Delphi consensus process. Overall, a clear consensus was achieved for 19 of the 28 statements. Consensus was reached on all statements on the topic of pain assessment and quality of life (QoL), including the need for regular pain assessment on a quantitative scale, the importance of distinguishing between different pain types, and the need to evaluate the impact of pain on patient QoL. The other four topics concerned acute and chronic pain management in adults and in children. Consensus was reached on statements regarding non-pharmacologic treatment and the use of first-line paracetamol (acetaminophen). There was a lack of consensus regarding the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, or opioids

Health Policy Brief: i pilastri dell'Engagement in Emofilia

About 5000 people in Italy suffer from hemophilia, the most common coagulation disorder. As for other chronic diseases, even in the case of hemophilia, the engagement of the patient is essential: the patients, in fact, must be empowered and helped to become strong partners of the care team and sensitized with respect to their rights and duties for the successful achievement of the goals set by their healthcare path. Hence the initiative to start a new research-intervention project in the field of hemophilia. The study had different phases of research: a first moment inspired by the principles of narrative medicine, aimed at collecting stories and narratives of patients with hemophilia related to the experience of the disease and therapy and expectations of active involvement in the relationship with the clinician. At the same time, among hematologists and patients has been surveyed the experience of therapeutical relationship and communication, to capture the aspects in which they feel effective and the areas of improvement and unmet needs. Subsequently, a workshop dedicated to patients and hematologists was organized to foster mutual awareness between these two targets and the formation of a better communication and relational skills of clinicians. The results of the project formed the basis for a policy brief document, aimed at disseminating recommendations to support better relationship and empathic communication between clinicians and patients

Environmental risk factors for inhibitor development in children with haemophilia A: a case-control study

This case-control study investigated the interactions between genetic and environmental factors and inhibitor development in 108 children with haemophilia A exclusively treated with recombinant factor VIII (FVIII). Sixty patients with inhibitors were compared with 48 inhibitor-free controls. Family history of inhibitors and null mutations in the FVIII gene were more prevalent in cases than in controls (20% vs. 2%, P = 0.001 and 83% vs. 64%, P = 0.04, respectively). On the other hand, there was no difference between cases and controls for such putative risk factors of inhibitor development as amniocentesis/villocentesis, premature/caesarean birth, breast-feeding, treatment during infections/vaccinations, surgical procedures and central nervous system bleeding. A trend was found for an increased risk of inhibitor development in children first treated at a young age (< 11 months); however, this was not confirmed after adjusting for genetic factors. The implementation of prophylaxis was evaluated as a putative risk factor in a subgroup of 25 cases: seven who started prophylaxis prior to inhibitor development and 18 potentially eligible for prophylaxis because they were inhibitor-free up to the age of 35 months (i.e. the upper limit of the age range at prophylaxis onset in cases and the median age at prophylaxis onset in controls). Patients who started prophylaxis had a lower inhibitor risk than those treated on demand (adjusted odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.9). The protective effect on inhibitor development shown by prophylaxis may represent an additional advantage prompting its use in haemophilic children

Recommendations for assessment, monitoring and follow-up of patients with haemophilia

Over the last few decades, clinical follow-up of patients with haemophilia has become more complex as a result of the introduction of new treatment strategies, the presence of comorbidities related to haemophilia or ageing, as well as the emergence of new tools to evaluate the medical and social consequences of haemophilia. This publication describes the parameters and information that should be documented and the tests, examinations and interventions required for optimal follow-up of a patient with haemophilia. In the absence of formal studies, the present recommendations have been established as result of a series of consensus meetings in the frame of the European Haemophilia Therapy Standardization Board (EHTSB). The following 11 domains were identified: Baseline information, Current status, Treatment, Inhibitor status, Bleeding, Joint status and pain, Comorbidities, Dental care, Physical activities, Social participation and Quality of life. For each domain, details are proposed for the relevant parameters to be captured and monitored as well as the relevant tools that facilitate data collection. Adopting these recommendations should help the individual care of patients and, even though this is not the primary objective of this article, it should also help at national and international level to shape a new approach to haemophilia by working towards a more standardized outcome assessment. Greater standardization should have implications for data collection, improvements in treatment evaluation and optimizing resources

Managing Relevant Clinical Conditions of Hemophilia A/B Patients

The Medical Directors of nine Italian Hemophilia Centers reviewed and discussed the key issues concerning the replacement therapy of hemophilia patients during a one-day consensus conference held in Rome one year ago. Particular attention was paid to the replacement therapy needed for surgery using continuous infusion (CI) versus bolus injection (BI) of standard and extended half-life Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in severe hemophilia A patients. Among the side effects, the risk of development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) and thromboembolic complications was addressed. The specific needs of mild hemophilia A patients were described, as well as the usage of bypassing agents to treat patients with high-responding inhibitors. Young hemophilia A patients may take significant advantages from primary prophylaxis three times or twice weekly, even with standard half-life (SHL) rFVIII concentrates. Patients affected by severe hemophilia B probably have a less severe clinical phenotype than severe hemophilia A patients, and in about 30% of cases may undergo weekly prophylaxis with an rFIX SHL concentrate. The prevalence of missense mutations in 55% of severe hemophilia B patients allows the synthesis of a partially changed FIX molecule that can play some hemostatic role at the level of endothelial cells or the subendothelial matrix. The flow back of infused rFIX from the extravascular to the plasma compartment allows a very long half-life of about 30 h in some hemophilia B patients. Once weekly, prophylaxis can assure a superior quality of life in a large severe or moderate hemophilia B population. According to the Italian registry of surgery, hemophilia B patients undergo joint replacement by arthroplasty less frequently than hemophilia A patients. Finally, the relationships between FVIII/IX genotypes and the pharmacokinetics of clotting factor concentrates have been investigated

Bioequivalence of recombinant factor VIII products: a position paper from the Italian Association of Hemophilia Centers

: Over the last three decades, the continuous evolution of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) concentrates for replacement treatment of hemophilia A, including recent extended half-life products, implies that patients may switch from one product to another, technologically more advanced, with the aim of improving treatment efficacy, safety, management and, ultimately, quality of life. In this scenario, the issues of bioequivalence of rFVIII products and the clinical implications of their interchangeability are keenly debated, in particular when economic reasons or purchasing systems influence product availability and choices. Although sharing the same Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) level, rFVIII concentrates, as other biological products, show relevant differences in terms of molecular structure, source and manufacturing process, which make them unique products, recognized as new active substances by regulatory agencies. Moreover, data from clinical trials with both standard and extended half-life products clearly document the large inter-patient variability of pharmacokinetic profiles after administering the same dose of the same product; in cross-over evaluations, even when mean values are comparable, some patients show better patterns with one product or with the comparator one. Pharmacokinetic assessment thus reflects the response to a specific product in the individual patient, with his genetic determinants, only partially identified, affecting the behavior of exogenous FVIII. These concepts, consistent with the currently recommended approach of personalization of prophylaxis, are discussed in this position paper endorsed by the Italian Association of Hemophilia Centers (AICE), highlighting that ATC or other available classifications do not completely consider differences between drugs and innovations and that substitutions of rFVIII products will not invariably ensure the previously achieved clinical outcomes or generate benefits for all patients