Fulvestrant: pharmacokinetics and pharmacology

Fulvestrant is a new type of oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist with no agonist activity and a novel pharmacological profile. Fulvestrant has been shown to significantly reduce cellular levels of the ER and progesterone receptor in both preclinical studies and in clinical trials of postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. This paper reviews the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of fulvestrant, which support the rationale for drug delivery as a single, once-monthly intramuscular injection, and show that this agent has minimal potential to be the subject, or cause, of significant cytochrome p450-mediated drug interactions

Essential considerations in the investigation of associations between insulin and cancer risk using prescription databases

Boyle, P Ford, I Robertson, Jfr La Vecchia, C Boffetta, P Autier, P eng England 2009/01/01 00:00 Ecancermedicalscience. 2009;3:174. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2009.174. Epub 2009 Dec 11.International audienceno abstrac

Microarray studies reveal novel genes associated with endocrine resistance in breast cancer

Background Endocrine resistance is a major hurdle in breast cancer management, and determining the underlying factors driving its growth and aggressive behaviour should vastly improve treatment. Methods Microarray technology (BD Atlas Plastic Human 12 K Microarrays; GeneSifter software), verified by PCR, western blotting and immunocytochemisty, was used to identify genes increased in acquired resistant models to tamoxifen (TamR) or faslodex (FasR) as potential predictive/prognostic markers and new therapeutic targets. Results Alongside known breast cancer genes (β-catenin, PEA3, vitronectin, CD44), two novel genes in endocrine resistance were revealed (the latter never previously described in breast cancer): a securin/cell cycle regulator Pituitary Tumour Transforming Gene-1 (PTTG1), and GDNF receptor-alpha 3 (GFRα3) reported to promote cell survival signalling via RET coreceptor. Altered levels of PTTG1, GFRα3, or their associated family members were observed in further endocrine resistant states, including an additional faslodex resistant model that has progressed to a highly-aggressive state (FasR-Lt) and XMCF-7 cells resistant to oestrogen deprivation. PTTG1 and GFRα3 induction were also implicated in limiting response to anti-EGFR agents currently in breast cancer trials, with GFRα3 ligand (artemin) largely overcoming drug response. mRNA studies in clinical disease revealed PTTG1 associated with lymph node spread, high tumour grade and proliferation, while GFRα3 was enriched in ER-negative tumours and those expressing EGFR, profiles implying roles in clinical resistance and aggressive tumour behaviour. Promisingly, PTTG1 or GFRα3 siRNA knockdown promoted cell kill and inhibited proliferation in the resistant models. Conclusion Cumulatively, these data indicate PTTG1 and GFRα3 may provide useful biomarkers, and perhaps clinically relevant therapeutic targets for multiple resistant states

Fulvestrant is an effective and well-tolerated endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results from clinical trials

Fulvestrant (‘Faslodex’) is a new type of endocrine treatment – an oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that downregulates the ER and has no agonist effects. Early efficacy data from phase I/II trials have demonstrated fulvestrant to be effective and well tolerated. Two randomised phase III trials have compared the efficacy of fulvestrant and the aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy. Fulvestrant (intramuscular injection 250 mg month−1) was found to be at least as effective as anastrozole (orally 1 mg day−1) for time to progression (5.5 vs 4.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR): 0.95; 95.14% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–1.10; P=0.48)) and objective response 19.2 vs 16.5%, respectively; treatment difference 2.75%; 95.14% CI, −2.27 to 9.05%; P=0.31). More recently, fulvestrant has also been shown to be noninferior to anastrozole in terms of overall survival, with median time to death being 26.4 months in fulvestrant-treated patients and 24.2 months in those treated with anastrozole (HR: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78–1.21; P=0.82). In a further randomised phase III trial, fulvestrant was compared with tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced disease in postmenopausal women. In the overall population, efficacy differences favoured tamoxifen and noninferiority of fulvestrant could not be ruled out. In the prospectively defined subset of patients with ER-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive disease, there was no statistically significant difference between fulvestrant and tamoxifen. This paper reviews the efficacy and tolerability results from these trials

A phase I trial to assess the pharmacology of the new oestrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant on the endometrium in healthy postmenopausal volunteers

While tamoxifen use is associated with clear benefits in the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer, it also exhibits partial oestrogen agonist activity that is associated with adverse events, including endometrial cancer. Fulvestrant (‘Faslodex’) is a new oestrogen receptor antagonist that downregulates the oestrogen receptor and has no known agonist effect. This single-centre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group trial was conducted to determine the direct effects of fulvestrant on the female endometrium when given alone and in combination with the oestrogen, ethinyloestradiol. Following a 14-day, pretrial screening period, 30 eligible postmenopausal volunteers were randomised to receive fulvestrant 250 mg, fulvestrant 125 mg or matched placebo administered as a single intramuscular injection. Two weeks postinjection, volunteers received 2-weeks concurrent exposure to ethinyloestradiol 20 μg day−1. Endometrial thickness was measured before and after the 14-day screening period with further measurements predose (to confirm a return to baseline) and on days 14, 28 and 42 post-treatment with fulvestrant. Pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were performed throughout the trial. Fulvestrant at a dose of 250 mg significantly (P=0.0001) inhibited the oestrogen-stimulated thickening of the endometrium compared with placebo. Neither the 125 mg nor 250 mg doses of fulvestrant demonstrated oestrogenic effects on the endometrium over the initial 14-day assessment period. Fulvestrant was well tolerated and reduced the incidence of ethinyloestradiol-related side effects. At the same dose level that is being evaluated in clinical trials of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, fulvestrant (250 mg) is an antioestrogen with no evidence of agonist activity in the endometrium of healthy postmenopausal women

"Resurrection of clinical efficacy" after resistance to endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: In a significant proportion of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients whose tumour has progressed within 6 months of endocrine therapy (de novo resistance), it is generally believed that the chance of achieving clinical benefit (CB) with further endocrine therapy is minimal. METHODS: Data was retrieved from a prospectively updated database of metastatic breast cancer. Relevant data was exported to SPSS™ software for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In oestrogen receptor (ER) positive MBC patients with assessable disease, CB was achieved in 159 (71.3%) (1(st )line) patients. When these patients were put on further endocrine therapy, the CB rates were 63.2% (on 2(nd )line), 46.1% (on 3(rd )line) and 20% (on 4(th )line) with a median duration of response (DOR) in those with CB of 22, 12, 11 and 15 months respectively. The remaining 64(28.7%) patients had de novo resistance on 1(st )line endocrine therapy. Seventeen of these patients were treated with further endocrine therapy. The CB rates were 29.4% (on 2(nd )line) and 22.2% (on 3(rd )line) with a median DOR in those with CB of 22.7 months and 14 months respectively. CONCLUSION: The chance of further endocrine response continues to decrease with each line of therapy, yet CB is still seen with reasonable duration even with a 4(th )line agent. In addition, further endocrine response, with long duration, can be seen in a significant proportion of patients who have developed de novo resistance to 1(st )line endocrine therapy. The use of further endocrine therapy should not be excluded under these circumstances

Efficacy and tolerability of high dose "ethinylestradiol" in post-menopausal advanced breast cancer patients heavily pre-treated with endocrine agents

BACKGROUND: High dose estrogens (HDEs) were frequently used as endocrine agents prior to the introduction of tamoxifen which carries fewer side effects. Due to the development of resistance to available endocrine agents in almost all women with metastatic breast cancer, interest has renewed in the use of HDEs as yet another endocrine option that may have activity. We report our experience with one of the HDEs ("ethinylestradiol" 1 mg daily) in advanced breast cancer (locally advanced and metastatic) in post-menopausal women who had progressed on multiple endocrine agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: According to a database of advanced breast cancer patients seen in our Unit since 1998, those who had complete set of information and fulfilled the following criteria were studied: (1) patients in whom further endocrine therapy was deemed appropriate i.e., patients who have had clinical benefit with previous endocrine agents or were not fit or unwilling to receive chemotherapy in the presence of potentially life-threatening visceral metastases; (2) disease was assessable by UICC criteria; (3) were treated with "ethinylestradiol" until they were withdrawn from treatment due to adverse events or disease progression. RESULTS: Twelve patients with a median age of 75.1 years (49.1 – 85 years) were identified. Majority (N = 8) had bony disease. They had ethinylestradiol as 3(rd )to 7(th )line endocrine therapy. One patient (8%) came off treatment early due to hepato-renal syndrome. Clinical benefit (objective response or durable stable disease for ≥ 6 months) was seen in 4 patients (33.3%) with a median duration of response of 10+ (7–36) months. The time to treatment failure was 4 (0.5–36) months. CONCLUSION: Yet unreported, high dose "ethinylestradiol" is another viable therapeutic strategy in heavily pre-treated patients when further endocrine therapy is deemed appropriate. Although it tends to carry more side effects, they may not be comparable to those of other HDEs (such as diethylstilbestrol) or chemotherapy

Bony metastases from breast cancer - a study of foetal antigen 2 as a blood tumour marker

Background : Foetal antigen 2 (FA-2), first isolated in the amniotic fluid, was shown to be the circulating form of the aminopropeptide of the alpha 1 chain of procollagen type I. Serum concentrations of FA-2 appeared to be elevated in a number of disorders of bone metabolism. This paper is the first report of its role as a marker of bone metabolism in metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Serum FA-2 concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay in 153 women with different stages of breast cancer and in 34 normal controls. Results: Serum FA-2 was significantly elevated in women with bony metastases (p < 0.015). Its levels were not significantly different among women with non-bony metastases, with non-metastatic disease, as well as among normal controls. Conclusions: FA-2 is a promising blood marker of bone metabolism. Further studies to delineate its role in the diagnosis and management of bony metastases from breast cancer are required

<i>ESR1</i> Mutations and Overall Survival on Fulvestrant versus Exemestane in Advanced Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Combined Analysis of the Phase III SoFEA and EFECT Trials.

Purpose ESR1 mutations are acquired frequently in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer after prior aromatase inhibitors. We assessed the clinical utility of baseline ESR1 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in the two phase III randomized trials of fulvestrant versus exemestane.Experimental design The phase III EFECT and SoFEA trials randomized patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer who had progressed on prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy, between fulvestrant 250 mg and exemestane. Baseline serum samples from 227 patients in EFECT, and baseline plasma from 161 patients in SoFEA, were analyzed for ESR1 mutations by digital PCR. The primary objectives were to assess the impact of ESR1 mutation status on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a combined analysis of both studies.Results ESR1 mutations were detected in 30% (151/383) baseline samples. In patients with ESR1 mutation detected, PFS was 2.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0-2.6] on exemestane and 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.0-6.0) on fulvestrant [hazard ratio (HR), 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89; P = 0.01). In patients without ESR1 mutations detected, PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.2) on exemestane and 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-5.5) on fulvestrant (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81-1.37; P = 0.69). There was an interaction between ESR1 mutation and treatment (P = 0.02). Patients with ESR1 mutation detected had 1-year OS of 62% (95% CI, 45%-75%) on exemestane and 80% (95% CI, 68%-87%) on fulvestrant (P = 0.04; restricted mean survival analysis). Patients without ESR1 mutations detected had 1-year OS of 79% (95% CI, 71%-85%) on exemestane and 81% (95% CI, 74%-87%) on fulvestrant (P = 0.69).Conclusions Detection of ESR1 mutations in baseline ctDNA is associated with inferior PFS and OS in patients treated with exemestane versus fulvestrant

Fulvestrant and the sequential endocrine cascade for advanced breast cancer

Following relapse on endocrine therapy for advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, it is common for patients to experience responses to alternative endocrine agents. Fulvestrant (‘Faslodex’) is a new type of endocrine treatment – an oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist with no agonist effects. Fulvestrant downregulates cellular levels of the ER resulting in decreased expression of the progesterone receptor. This unique mode of action means that it is important that fulvestrant is placed optimally within the sequence of endocrine therapies to ensure that patients gain maximum benefit. Fulvestrant has shown efficacy when used after progression on tamoxifen or anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. After progression on fulvestrant, subsequent endocrine treatments can produce responses in many patients, demonstrating that fulvestrant does not lead to crossresistance with other endocrine therapies. Responses to fulvestrant have also been observed in patients heavily pretreated with prior endocrine therapy. Fulvestrant is a versatile endocrine agent that may be integrated into the therapeutic sequence prior to, or subsequent to, other hormonal therapies, and represents a valuable additional antioestrogen for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer