21 research outputs found
Intellectual Function in Mexican Children Living in a Mining Area and Environmentally Exposed to Manganese
Standardizing effect size from linear regression models with log-transformed variables for meta-analysis
Background: Meta-analysis is very useful to summarize the effect of a treatment or a risk factor for a given disease.
Often studies report results based on log-transformed variables in order to achieve the principal assumptions of a
linear regression model. If this is the case for some, but not all studies, the effects need to be homogenized.
Methods: We derived a set of formulae to transform absolute changes into relative ones, and vice versa, to allow
including all results in a meta-analysis. We applied our procedure to all possible combinations of log-transformed
independent or dependent variables. We also evaluated it in a simulation based on two variables either normally or
asymmetrically distributed.
Results: In all the scenarios, and based on different change criteria, the effect size estimated by the derived set of
formulae was equivalent to the real effect size. To avoid biased estimates of the effect, this procedure should be
used with caution in the case of independent variables with asymmetric distributions that significantly differ from
the normal distribution. We illustrate an application of this procedure by an application to a meta-analysis on the
potential effects on neurodevelopment in children exposed to arsenic and manganese.
Conclusions: The procedure proposed has been shown to be valid and capable of expressing the effect size of a
linear regression model based on different change criteria in the variables. Homogenizing the results from different
studies beforehand allows them to be combined in a meta-analysis, independently of whether the transformations
had been performed on the dependent and/or independent variables
Association of outdoor air pollution with the prevalence of asthma in children of Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Experiencia de participación comunitaria para el manejo adecuado de residuos sólidos urbanos en México
Evidence of human occupation in Mexico around the Last Glacial Maximum.
The initial colonization of the Americas remains a highly debated topic1, and the exact timing of the first arrivals is unknown. The earliest archaeological record of Mexico-which holds a key geographical position in the Americas-is poorly known and understudied. Historically, the region has remained on the periphery of research focused on the first American populations2. However, recent investigations provide reliable evidence of a human presence in the northwest region of Mexico3,4, the Chiapas Highlands5, Central Mexico6 and the Caribbean coast7-9 during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene epochs. Here we present results of recent excavations at Chiquihuite Cave-a high-altitude site in central-northern Mexico-that corroborate previous findings in the Americas10-17of cultural evidence that dates to the Last Glacial Maximum (26,500-19,000 years ago)18, and which push back dates for human dispersal to the region possibly as early as 33,000-31,000 years ago. The site yielded about 1,900 stone artefacts within a 3-m-deep stratified sequence, revealing a previously unknown lithic industry that underwent only minor changes over millennia. More than 50 radiocarbon and luminescence dates provide chronological control, and genetic, palaeoenvironmental and chemical data document the changing environments in which the occupants lived. Our results provide new evidence for the antiquity of humans in the Americas, illustrate the cultural diversity of the earliest dispersal groups (which predate those of the Clovis culture) and open new directions of research