Therapist-client sex in psychotherapy: attitudes of professionals and students towards ethical arguments

Data suggest that a substantial proportion of psychotherapists engage in therapist-client sex (TCS), violating national and international ethical guidelines. The objective of our study was to find a new and effective starting point for preventive interventions.; Using an online questionnaire, this study explored professionals' attitudes toward aspects of a TCS-case example influencing the tendency to pursue colleagues' TCS, including self-interest and responsibility ascribed to clients.; A total of 421 participants expressed preferences for courses of action and rated given information in a questionnaire. Results indicate that TCS is most often condemned for its inherent carelessness towards clients, its exploitative nature, the abuse of dependency and for counteracting the inherent intention of psychotherapy. Partial responsibility for TCS was attributed to clients by 41.3% of the respondents. Although self-interest related information was rated as an acceptable reason against pursuing TCS, a strong tendency exists to confront an abusive colleague, even at the risk of own disadvantages.; In the detailed discussion ethical arguments against TCS (other than the certainly inflicted, but hardly measurable harm) are elaborated. In particular the incompatibility of TCS with a psychotherapeutic relationship, the responsibility for TCS in the asymmetrical client-therapist relationship and the legitimacy of self-protection are discussed.; Reasoning against TCS can and should be based on explicit, ethical requirements for psychotherapists. Furthermore, integrating the topic in psychotherapists' training is encouraged and a discrete procedure to report a colleague's TCS is requested

Schizophrenia and estrogens

Since the beginning of the 20th Century, psychiatrists have recognized the possible association between schizophrenia and estrogens [1]. Early studies by Kraepelin [2] and Kretschmer [3] described signs of a chronic "hypoestrogenism" in women with schizophrenia, and observations indicating an association between blood estrogen levels and acute psychotic symptomatology have long existed

What do we really know about late-onset schizophrenia?

Actual knowledge on classical late-onset schizophrenia, i.e. the schizophrenic disorders with onset after age 40 years, is reviewed regarding incidence, symptomatology and course. As is shown, sound empirical knowledge is scarce. Reasons for this are, on the one hand, the conceptual and terminological confusion which has occurred internationally regarding this illness group, and, on the other hand, the methodological limitations of the empirical studies conducted on this clinical picture thus far. If we only draw onclassical late-onset schizophrenia, as originally defined by Bleuler, and primarily on methodologically sound studies, as well as on own studies, we can nevertheless conclude that the term "late-onset schizophrenia” could be omitted. Late-onset schizophrenia does not seem to be a distinct entity, but instead seems to belong to the same illness group as classical schizophrenia with earlier onset. Slight differences in symptomatology and course are probably due to unspecific influences of age. The markedly higher proportion of women among late-onset cases, as well as our finding that symptomatology and course of late-onset women are comparably poor, could possibly be explained by an effect of the female sex hormone oestradio

"Selbstscreen-Prodrom" - ein Selbstbeurteilungsinstrument zur Früherkennung von psychischen Erkrankungen und Psychosen

OBJECTIVE: In the past years, the significance of early detection of psychoses has been increasingly recognized. Screening for the onset of disorders should focus on individuals seeking treatment in an outpatient setting and should preferably operate stepwise. Within a prospective study for the early detection of psychoses (FePsy = Früh Erkennung von PSYchosen) the self-rating instrument "Self-screen Prodrome" was developed to differentiate between healthy individuals, individuals with psychosis or an at-risk mental state for psychosis and patients with other ICD-10 diagnoses. METHOD: The "Self-screen Prodrome" was developed by taking established risk factors and early signs of disease into account. In particular, prodromes and pre-psychotic symptoms were captured. A total score and a subscale were analyzed with regard to validity and reliability. RESULTS: The total score "Self-screen Prodrome" distinguished between outpatients with a mental disorder and healthy individuals (Cut-off < or = 6; sensitivity: 85 % specificity: 91 %). Additionally the subscale distinguished between psychosis-(risk)-individuals and outpatients with other ICD-10 psychiatric diagnoses (Cut-off < or = 2; sensitivity: 85 % specificity: 39 %). CONCLUSION: The "Self-screen Prodrome" is a useful instrument that a) separates mentally ill patients from healthy individuals and b) filters individuals with a risk of developing psychoses from patients with other ICD-10 diagnoses for further screening. The next step in the early detection of psychoses for identified individuals should be a detailed psychiatric exploration by experts