168 research outputs found
Global sensitivity analysis of computer models with functional inputs
Global sensitivity analysis is used to quantify the influence of uncertain
input parameters on the response variability of a numerical model. The common
quantitative methods are applicable to computer codes with scalar input
variables. This paper aims to illustrate different variance-based sensitivity
analysis techniques, based on the so-called Sobol indices, when some input
variables are functional, such as stochastic processes or random spatial
fields. In this work, we focus on large cpu time computer codes which need a
preliminary meta-modeling step before performing the sensitivity analysis. We
propose the use of the joint modeling approach, i.e., modeling simultaneously
the mean and the dispersion of the code outputs using two interlinked
Generalized Linear Models (GLM) or Generalized Additive Models (GAM). The
``mean'' model allows to estimate the sensitivity indices of each scalar input
variables, while the ``dispersion'' model allows to derive the total
sensitivity index of the functional input variables. The proposed approach is
compared to some classical SA methodologies on an analytical function. Lastly,
the proposed methodology is applied to a concrete industrial computer code that
simulates the nuclear fuel irradiation
Global Sensitivity Analysis of Stochastic Computer Models with joint metamodels
The global sensitivity analysis method, used to quantify the influence of
uncertain input variables on the response variability of a numerical model, is
applicable to deterministic computer code (for which the same set of input
variables gives always the same output value). This paper proposes a global
sensitivity analysis methodology for stochastic computer code (having a
variability induced by some uncontrollable variables). The framework of the
joint modeling of the mean and dispersion of heteroscedastic data is used. To
deal with the complexity of computer experiment outputs, non parametric joint
models (based on Generalized Additive Models and Gaussian processes) are
discussed. The relevance of these new models is analyzed in terms of the
obtained variance-based sensitivity indices with two case studies. Results show
that the joint modeling approach leads accurate sensitivity index estimations
even when clear heteroscedasticity is present
Bayesian Inference from Composite Likelihoods, with an Application to Spatial Extremes
Composite likelihoods are increasingly used in applications where the full
likelihood is analytically unknown or computationally prohibitive. Although the
maximum composite likelihood estimator has frequentist properties akin to those
of the usual maximum likelihood estimator, Bayesian inference based on
composite likelihoods has yet to be explored. In this paper we investigate the
use of the Metropolis--Hastings algorithm to compute a pseudo-posterior
distribution based on the composite likelihood. Two methodologies for adjusting
the algorithm are presented and their performance on approximating the true
posterior distribution is investigated using simulated data sets and real data
on spatial extremes of rainfall
Likelihood-based inference for max-stable processes
The last decade has seen max-stable processes emerge as a common tool for the
statistical modeling of spatial extremes. However, their application is
complicated due to the unavailability of the multivariate density function, and
so likelihood-based methods remain far from providing a complete and flexible
framework for inference. In this article we develop inferentially practical,
likelihood-based methods for fitting max-stable processes derived from a
composite-likelihood approach. The procedure is sufficiently reliable and
versatile to permit the simultaneous modeling of marginal and dependence
parameters in the spatial context at a moderate computational cost. The utility
of this methodology is examined via simulation, and illustrated by the analysis
of U.S. precipitation extremes
Rejoinder to "Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes"
Rejoinder to "Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes" by A. C. Davison, S.
A. Padoan and M. Ribatet [arXiv:1208.3378].Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/12-STS376REJ the
Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes
The areal modeling of the extremes of a natural process such as rainfall or
temperature is important in environmental statistics; for example,
understanding extreme areal rainfall is crucial in flood protection. This
article reviews recent progress in the statistical modeling of spatial
extremes, starting with sketches of the necessary elements of extreme value
statistics and geostatistics. The main types of statistical models thus far
proposed, based on latent variables, on copulas and on spatial max-stable
processes, are described and then are compared by application to a data set on
rainfall in Switzerland. Whereas latent variable modeling allows a better fit
to marginal distributions, it fits the joint distributions of extremes poorly,
so appropriately-chosen copula or max-stable models seem essential for
successful spatial modeling of extremes.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/11-STS376 the Statistical
Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical
Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
- …