8,389 research outputs found

    The Impact of Replacing Principals on Student Achievement in DC Public Schools

    Get PDF
    In 2007, the District of Columbia (D.C.) passed the Public Education Reform Amendment Act, which established mayoral control of D.C. Public Schools (DCPS) and led to the appointment of Michelle Rhee as school chancellor. In an effort to boost student achievement, Chancellor Rhee replaced many school principals as one of her first reforms. For the 2008 -- 2009 school year, 39 percent of the principals in the school district -- 51 individuals -- did not return, and more were replaced in the following years. We measured whether students in a school with a new principal performed better on standardized tests than they would have if the original principal had been retained. To do so, we analyzed the changes in student achievement that occurred when principals who left at the end of each of the school years from 2007 -- 2008 through 2010 -- 2011 were replaced. We compared the achievement of students in DCPS schools before and after a change in school leadership, and then compared this change to the change in the achievement of students from a sample of comparison schools within DCPS that kept the same principal

    What Happened Sixty Years Ago?: ROK-US Deep Distrust between President Rhee and Eisenhower

    Get PDF
    Many letters were sent between President Rhee Syng-Man and President Dwight Eisenhower before and after the release of anti-communist POWs which was unilaterally ordered by Rhee. According to these letters, President Rhee intended to use the release as a means to disturb the armistice and Ike was furious to the point of devising another plan to replace leadership in South Korea. According to the letters, the conflict between the two leaders was much more serious than it had been already assessed by scholars. Furthermore, Rhee's March North for Unification was another controversial issue after the armistice. It was closely related to the political conference which was a critical provision of the Armistice Agreement. The conference was to be held three months after the armistice was signed. Rhee refused to attend the conference and wished to implement his policy in case the conference failed, whereas the US government strongly opposed any military reaction against the communists. The controversy continued until the end of the Rhee administration. What caused these serious conflicts at the critical moment between two countries that in the end signed a mutual security pact? According to the letters, the cause mainly stemmed from Rhee's hawkish policy which rejected any peaceful solution of the Korean problem. However, this is a reflection of Rhees disappointment not only at the change in the war policy of the UN and the US, but also at the vague comments by President Eisenhower and Secretary Dulles about Rhees request

    The Need for Balanced Methods of Measuring Performance

    Get PDF
    Michelle Rhee weighs in on measuring success in pubic education

    Applying Economic Instruments in Developing Countries: From Theory to Implementation

    Get PDF
    This paper proceeds as follows: in the next section we briefly review the experience with the implementation of economic instruments in both OECD countries and developing countries. The types of instruments considered are: pollution taxes/charges, product taxes/charges, deposit-refund schemes, and tradable permits. Also, the related practices of earmarking revenues from EIs and creating specialised environmental funds are considered. In section 3, a general framework is presented for evaluating alternative instruments in terms of their ease of implementation, and in the final section some suggestions are advanced for addressing the more common implementation problems. The question of how environmental policy affects competitiveness in an open economy is also briefly considered.Economic instruments

    Poetics of Cross-Cultural Relation: Critical Performances by Artists kate-hers RHEE and Patty Chang

    Get PDF
    This article explores anti-racist, feminist performance and video art by kate-hers RHEE and Patty Chang. Parodic performances of awkward sexual encounters in works such as RHEEโ€™s The Chocolate Kiss (2013) and Changโ€™s The Product Love (2009) embody and deconstruct identity formation within transnational German and Asian American contexts. I explore how RHEE and Chang distinctly challenge sexist and racist stereotypes and the objectification of Asian women, while problematizing cultural categorization through (mis)translations and poetic relations. The article illuminates how these artists complicate Asian American identities via variegated explorations of critical race theories and connected histories of cross-cultural representation

    Grading report -- future park site, Hawaii Loa Ridge, Wailupe, Oahu, Hawaii

    Get PDF
    Includes laboratory test results, field density test results, site and density test location plan, and laboratory compaction curves.Gray, Rhee & Associates, Inc

    The association between accounting and market-based risk measures

    Get PDF
    The paper derives operating and financial measures of leverage and tests their association with market based measures of equity risk. It is the first such study to use purely accounting-based data to derive the leverage measures. In line with previous literature it conducts a new test on the relative importance of operating and financial leverage. The results suggest that operating costs have a greater impact

    Political Upheaval to Follow Gulf War, Predicts UD Historian

    Get PDF
    News release announces T.C. Rhee\u27s comments on the remnants of the Gulf War and how it could create major problems for U.S. foreign policy

    An Analysis on the Hangeul Simplification Policy During the Rhee Administration in the 1950s

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ตญ์ œ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๊ตญ์ œํ•™๊ณผ(ํ•œ๊ตญํ•™์ „๊ณต), 2021. 2. ๋ฐ•ํƒœ๊ท  .This thesis examines the Hangeul simplification policy that took place during the Rhee Administration in the 1950s in South Korea. The Hangeul simplification shock was a result of the revision of the orthography raised by President Syngman Rhee. This incident is a complex incident with various characteristics such as history, politics, society, and culture. The Syngman Rhee administration's attempt to unilaterally enforce spelling has brought great inconvenience to the whole society as well as the language life of the whole country. To understand this case in-depth, the process of the Korean orthography establishment should be understood first. The debate between phonemicism and morphism over the spelling rule continued to exist on the Korean Peninsula. During the Japanese colonial period, many attempts were made to unify the Korean spelling with the Academic Affairs Bureau of Government-General of Chosen. This movement was, in the end, only part of the Japanese imperialist's intended language control. Against this background, the Korean Language Society launched a Korean language movement for the unification of the Korean language. Due to the incident of the Korean Language Society, the Korean Language Society became a representative cultural organization bearing the national spirit that was oppressed by the Japanese imperialism to preserve the Korean language. The Unification Plan (1933), established by the Korean Language Society, was widely accepted as a scientific spelling rule after liberation, in a symbolic meaning of the achievements of the anti-colonial struggle and the national independence movement. On October 9, 1948, President Syngman Rhee announced the prelude to the simplification of Hangeul through a discourse. On April 27, 1953, Prime Minister Baek Doo-jin announced the 8th Prime Minister's decree, causing great repercussions throughout the country. Syngman Rhee, who stayed abroad for a long time, was familiar with the spelling rule used in the Bible in Korea 50 years ago and was not familiar with the 1933 Unification Plan which was popular in Korea. The that Syngman Rhee tried to promote was an attempt to restore the spelling 50 years ago. The Unification Plan (1933) had already been gradually settled through public education in Korea, and Syngman Rhee's instructions for Hangeul simplification caused much confusion in the language and text life of the whole people. The government's unilateral action also led to political turmoil. Eventually, the National Assembly decided to solve this problem by forming a special countermeasure committee jointly with the government, the National Assembly, and the academic institute. However, the Korean simplification policy remained unsolved due to the influence of the 1954 amendment of the constitution. Meanwhile, the work of establishing a permanent decision-making system for the legitimacy and legitimacy of language policies at the national level has been completed. Such a system was recognized as a result of democratic procedures and the participation of the academic institute, a group of scholars with expertise. Eventually, in 1955, Syngman Rhee officially declared the end of the Hangul Simplification Policy. As a result of the thesis, it was possible to find out that political factors had a lot of influence on the reason why President Syngman Rhee, who was not a Korean language scholar, tried to make this language policy happen. Especially in the Cold War system, it is considered to have worked a lot that the competition for ideological superiority between the two Koreas and the One-sidedness in his decision process. The fundamental reason why the simplification policy was not enforced successfully is that this policy is reverse modernization.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 1950๋…„๋Œ€ ์ด์Šน๋งŒ ์ •๋ถ€์˜ ํ•œ๊ธ€ ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™” ํŒŒ๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ ๊ตฌ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์Šน๋งŒ ์ •๊ถŒ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์˜ ํ•œ๊ธ€๊ฐ„์†Œํ™”ํŒŒ๋™์€ ์ด์Šน๋งŒ ๋Œ€ํ†ต๋ น์ด ์ œ๊ธฐํ•œ ๋งž์ถค๋ฒ• ๊ฐœ์ •์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์‚ฌ๊ฑด์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด ์‚ฌ๊ฑด์€ ์—ญ์‚ฌ, ์ •์น˜, ์‚ฌํšŒ, ๋ฌธํ™” ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์‚ฌ๊ฑด์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šน๋งŒ ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋งž์ถค๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฐ•ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋Š” ์ „๊ตญ ๋ฏผ์˜ ์–ธ์–ด ์ƒํ™œ์€ ๋ฌผ๋ก , ์ „ ์‚ฌํšŒ์— ํฐ ๋ถˆํŽธ์„ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์™”๋˜ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ์‚ฌ๊ฑด์„ ๊นŠ์ด ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ์ผ๋‹จ ํ•œ๊ธ€ ๋งž์ถค๋ฒ• ํ‘œ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ •๋ฆฝ๊ณผ์ • ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์•Œ์•„์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒ ์ž๋ฒ•์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ํ‘œ์Œ์ฃผ์˜ ๋ฐ ํ˜•ํƒœ์ฃผ์˜์˜ ๋…ผ์Ÿ ์€ ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„์—์„œ ๊ณ„์† ์กด์žฌํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ผ์ œ๊ฐ•์ ๊ธฐ ๋‹น์‹œ ์กฐ์„ ์ด๋… ๋ถ€ ํ•™๋ฌด๊ตญ์— ํ•œ๊ธ€ ๋งž์ถค๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ต์ผํ•˜๊ธฐ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ์‹œ๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์›€์ง์ž„์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ์ผ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์˜๋„ํ–ˆ๋˜ ์–ด๋ฌธ ํ†ต์ œ์˜ ์ผํ™˜์ผ ๋ฟ์ด ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฐ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์กฐ์„ ์–ดํ•™ํšŒ๊ฐ€ ๊ตญ์–ด ํ†ต์ผ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ตญ์–ด ์šด๋™ ์— ๋‚˜์„ฐ๋‹ค. ์กฐ์„ ์–ดํ•™ํšŒ์‚ฌ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์„ ์–ดํ•™ํšŒ๋Š” ๊ตญ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ง€ํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ผ์ œ์˜ ํƒ„์••์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ๋ฏผ์กฑ์ •์‹ ์„ ํ’ˆ๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ๋ฌธํ™”๋‹จ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์กฐ์„ ์–ดํ•™ํšŒ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ œ์ •๋œ (1933)์€ ๋ฐ˜์‹๋ฏผํ†ต์น˜ ํˆฌ์Ÿ๊ณผ ๋ฏผ์กฑ๋…๋ฆฝ์šด๋™์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒ์ง•์  ์˜๋ฏธ๋กœ, ํ•ด๋ฐฉ ํ›„ ์ž์—ฐ ์Šค๋ ˆ ๊ณผํ•™์ ์ธ ์ฒ ์ž๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ›์•„๋“ค์˜€๋‹ค. 1948 ๋…„ 10 ์›” 9 ์ผ, ์ด์Šน๋งŒ ๋Œ€ํ†ต๋ น์ด ๋‹ดํ™”๋ฌธ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๊ธ€๊ฐ„์†Œํ™”ํŒŒ๋™ ์˜ ์„œ๋ง‰์„ ์˜ˆ๊ณ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚จ๋ถ์ „์Ÿ์ด ์ž ์ž ํ•ด์ง€๊ณ  1953 ๋…„ 4 ์›” 27 ์ผ ๋ฐฑ๋‘์ง„ ๊ตญ๋ฌด์ด๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฆฌ ์ œ 8 ํ˜ธ๋ น์„ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜จ ๋‚˜๋ผ์— ํฐ ๋ฐ˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถˆ๋Ÿฌ ์ผ์œผ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ํ•ด์™ธ์— ์˜ค๋ž˜ ๋จธ๋ฌด๋Š” ์ด์Šน๋งŒ์ด ์ต์ˆ™ํ•œ ๋งž์ถค ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹น์‹œ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ 50 ๋…„ ์ „์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๊ฒฝ์‹ ๋งž์ถค๋ฒ•์ด๊ณ  ๊ตญ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋ณด๊ธ‰๋œ 1933 ๋…„ ์— ์ž˜ ์“ฐ์ง€ ๋ชปํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์Šน๋งŒ์ด ์ถ”์ง„ํ•˜๋ ค ๊ณ  ํ•œ ์€ ๋ฐ”๋กœ 50 ๋…„ ์ „์˜ ๋งž์ถค๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋˜๋Œ๋ฆฌ ๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„์˜€๋‹ค. (1933)์€ ์ด๋ฏธ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ๊ณต๊ต์œก์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ฐจ ์ •์ฐฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ์ด์Šน๋งŒ์ด ๋‚ด๋ฆฐ ํ•œ๊ธ€ ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™” ์ง€์‹œ๋Š” ์ „ ๊ตญ๋ฏผ์˜ ์–ธ์–ด์ƒํ™œ, ๋ฌธ์ž ์ƒํ™œ์— ๋งŽ์€ ํ˜ผ๋ž€์ƒ์„ ์•ผ๊ธฐ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ์ •๋ถ€ ์˜ ์ผ๋ฐฉ์ ์ธ ํ–‰๋™์€ ์ •์น˜ ํŒŒ๋™์œผ๋กœ๋„ ์ด์–ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ๊ตญํšŒ์—์„œ ์ •๋ถ€, ๊ตญํšŒ, ํ•™์ˆ ์› ๊ณต๋™์œผ๋กœ ํŠน๋ณ„๋Œ€์ฑ…์œ„์›ํšŒ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๋ฌธ ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ๋กœ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ 1954 ๋…„ ์‚ฌ์‚ฌ์˜ค์ž… ๊ฐœํ—Œ์•ˆ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์€ ๋ฏธํ•ด๊ฒฐ์ธ ์ฑ„๋กœ ๋‚จ์•„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ ์–ธ์–ด ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ํ•ฉ๋ฒ•์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ •๋‹น์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•ญ๊ตฌ์ ์ธ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ ์ • ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ์ž‘์—…์€ ์™„์„ฑํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์  ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋ฐŸ๊ณ , ์ „๋ฌธ์„ฑ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๋Š” ํ•™์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน์ธ ํ•™์ˆ ์›์˜ ์ฐธ์—ฌ๋„ ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๊ณต์ธ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ 1955 ๋…„ ์ด์Šน๋งŒ์ด ๋‹ดํ™”๋กœ ํ•œ๊ธ€๊ฐ„์†Œํ™”ํŒŒ๋™ ์‚ฌ๊ฑด ์ข… ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์‹ ์„ ํฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ด์Šน๋งŒ ๋Œ€ํ†ต๋ น์ด ๊ตญ์–ดํ•™์ž๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹˜์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด ๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ง€์‹œ๋ฅผ ๋‚ด๋ฆฌ๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“  ์ด์œ ์—๋Š” ์ •์น˜์ ์ธ ์š”์†Œ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์€ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์„ ๋ผ์นœ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๋ƒ‰์ „ ์ฒด์ œ์— ์žˆ์–ด ๋‚จ๋ถํ•œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ด๋ฐ์˜ฌ๋กœ๊ธฐ ์šฐ์›”์„ฑ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ๋ฐ ๊ทธ์˜ ์ •์ฑ… ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ณผ์ •์˜ ์ผ๋ฐฉ์„ฑ ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ์ž‘์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณธ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๊ฐ•ํ–‰ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ ๊ทผ๋ณธ ์ ์ธ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ์ด ์•ˆ์€ ์—ญ(้€†)๊ทผ๋Œ€ํ™”์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค.1 ์žฅ ์„œ๋ก  1 1. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ . 1 2. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ถ„์„. 5 3. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„์™€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก . 7 2 ์žฅ ํ•œ๊ธ€ ๋งž์ถค๋ฒ• ํ‘œ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ •๋ฆฝ๊ณผ์ • 9 1. ๊ทผ๋Œ€ ์ด์ „. 9 2. ์ผ์ œ๊ฐ•์ ๊ธฐ ๋งž์ถค๋ฒ• ๊ทœ์ • ์‹œ๋„. 10 3. ์กฐ์„ ์–ดํ•™ํšŒ์˜ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ. 15 3 ์žฅ ํ•œ๊ธ€ ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™” ํŒŒ๋™ 21 1. ํ•œ๊ตญ์ „์Ÿ ์ด์ „ ํ•œ๊ธ€ ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™” ๋…ผ์˜์˜ ๊ธฐ์›. 21 2. 1953-1955๋…„ ํ•œ๊ธ€ ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™” ํŒŒ๋™. 24 3. ํ•œ๊ธ€ ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™”์˜ ์‹คํŒจ. 49 4 ์žฅ ํ•œ๊ธ€ ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™” ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ์ •์น˜์„ฑ 53 1. ๋ฐ˜๊ณต์ •์ฑ…. 53 2. ์ •์ฑ… ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ณผ์ •์˜ ์ผ๋ฐฉ์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ. 62 5 ์žฅ ๊ฒฐ๋ก  67 ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ 71 ABSTRACT 76Maste

    DNA-Protein Interactions in High Definition

    Get PDF
    An elegant, genome-wide approach to define the precise DNA sequences bound by transcription factors has been developed by Rhee and Pugh
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore