JAK-2 inhibitors and allogeneic transplant in myelofibrosis

7The activation of the JAK1/JAK2 pathway plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis. Treatment with the JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib demonstrated to reduce splenomegaly and symptoms in patients affected by myelofibrosis, leading to a significant improvement of overall survival in comparison with the supportive therapies. Taking in account this recent therapeutic progress, it is necessary to redefine the role of the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which has been considered the only curative option for fit myelofibrosis patients up to now. In the era of JAK2 inhibitors, allogeneic transplant is still indicated in patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk myelofibrosis or red blood cell transfusion dependent patients or patients with unfavourable karyotype. There is no direct evidence to recommend which conditioning regimen should be preferentially adopted. Graft failure, relapse and transplant related mortality are still current issues of the allogeneic stem cell transplantation, particularly from unrelated donors. Ruxolitinib can be efficaciously included in the platform of allogeneic transplant. In fact, ruxolitinib treatment for 3-4 months before transplant has demonstrated to reduce spleen and improve performance status in about 30-50% of patients, without impairing the outcome of the subsequent transplant. Ruxolitinib has to stopped the day before conditioning to avoid rebound phenomenon. There are no sufficient data to recommend ruxolitinib administration after transplant with the aim of eradicating minimal residual disease and preventing relapse.openopenPatriarca, F; Sperotto, A; De Marchi, R; Perali, G; Cigana, C; Lazzarotto, D; Fanin, RPatriarca, Francesca; Sperotto, A; De Marchi, R; Perali, G; Cigana, C; Lazzarotto, D; Fanin, Renat

Experts’ consensus on the definition and management of high risk multiple myeloma

High risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) at diagnosis is currently recognized according to the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) which was set up in 2015. Since then, new clinical and biological prognostic factors have been developed, which could implement the definition of High Risk (HR) category. We conducted a survey in order to identify which additional parameters, both clinical and biological, are considered more useful for the clinical practice and to evaluate if the management of Multiple Myeloma (MM) should change on the basis of the risk category. A questionnaire, consisting of 8 statements, was submitted to 6 Italian experts, from the European Myeloma Network (EMN) Research Italy, using the Delphi method. The colleagues were asked to answer each question using a scale between 0 and 100. If a statement did not reach at least 75 out of 100 points from all the participants, it was rephrased on the basis of the proposal of the experts and resubmitted in a second or further round, until a consensus was reached among all. From the first round of the survey a strong consensus was reached regarding the opportunity to revise the R-ISS including chromosome 1 abnormality, TP53 mutation or deletion, circulating plasma cells by next generation flow and extramedullary plasmacytomas. No consensus was reached for the definition of “double hit” MM and for the application in clinical practice of treatment strategies based on the risk category. In the second round of the Delphi questionnaire, “double-hit” MM was recognized by the association of at least two high-risk cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities. Moreover, the experts agreed to reserve an intensified treatment only to specific conditions, such as plasma cell leukaemia or patients with multiple extramedullary plasmacytomas, while they admitted that there are not sufficient real word data in order to modify treatment on the basis of MRD assessment in clinical practice. This survey suggests that the definition of HRMM should be implemented by additional clinical and biological risk factors, that will be useful to guide treatment in the future

Phase II Trial of Allogeneic Transplantation Plus Novel Drugs in Multiple Myeloma: Effect of Intensifying Reduced-Intensity Conditioning with Bortezomib and Adding Maintenance Treatment

The use of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has decreased the risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). In contrast, disease relapse remains the most frequent cause of treatment failure and death. Owing to both their antimyeloma effect and immunomodulatory properties, novel drugs could improve outcomes after alloSCT. This phase II European Myeloma Network trial was designed to evaluate the combination of alloSCT with novel agents. The study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of RIC intensified with bortezomib (Bz) prior to alloSCT for high-risk (HR) multiple myeloma (MM) patients, as well as the efficacy of post-transplantation maintenance with Bz and lenalidomide (Len). Patients received RIC with Bz on days -9 and -2, fludarabine on days -6 to -4, and melphalan on day -3. Patients who were in complete response (CR) or near CR at day +100 post-transplantation received 6 cycles of Bz every 56 days, and the remaining received Bz, Len, and dexamethasone. Len maintenance was started on day +180 at a dose of 5 mg and continued until relapse or toxicity occurred. Of the 24 patients included, 21 were evaluable on day +100, including 12 in CR, 4 in very good partial response, 3 in partial response, and 2 with relapse or progression. The cumulative incidence (CuI) of relapse was 13.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2% to 31.3%) at 1 year and 28.5% (95% CI, 11.1% to 48.9%) at 2 years. The CuI of NRM was 21.1% (95% CI, 7.4% to 39.4%) at 2 years. With a median follow-up of 39 months (range, 1 to 67 months), the median event-free survival (EFS) was 29 months, and median overall survival (OS) was not reached. EFS and OS at 3 years were 42.5% (95% CI, 21.9% to 61.7%) and 74.01% (95% CI, 50.9% to 87.5%), respectively. The use of Bz within an RIC regimen allows for a high response rate after alloSCT. Maintenance with Bz and Len is feasible and provides remarkable results in terms of EFS and OS in HR MM patients

Predictive value of pretransplantation molecular minimal residual disease assessment by WT1 gene expression in FLT3-positive acute myeloid leukemia

The FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a negative prognostic factor and, in these cases, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) can represent an important therapeutic option, especially if performed in complete remission (CR). However, it is increasingly clear that not all cytological CRs (cCRs) are the same and that minimal residual disease (MRD) before allo-SCT could have an impact on AML outcome. Unfortunately, FLT3, due its instability of expression, is still not considered a good molecular MRD marker. We analyzed the outcome of allo-SCT in a population of FLT3-positive AML patients according to molecular MRD at the pretransplantation workup, assessed by the quantitative expression evaluation of the panleukemic marker Wilms\u2019 tumor (WT1) gene. Sixty-two consecutive AML FLT3-positive patients received allo-SCT between 2005 and 2016 in our center. The median age at transplantation was 55 years. The quantitative analysis of the WT1 gene expression (bone marrow samples) was available in 54 out of 62 (87%) cases, both at diagnosis (100% overexpressing WT1 with a mean of 9747 \ub1 8064 copies) and before allo-SCT (33 WT1-negative and 21 WT1-positive cases at the pretransplantation workup). Of these cases, 33/54 (61%) were both in cCR and molecular remission (WT1-negative) at the time of transplantation, 13/54 (24%) were in cCR but not in molecular remission (WT1-positive), and 8/54 (15%) showed a cytological evidence of disease (relapsed or refractory). Both post-allo-SCT overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly better in patients who were WT1-negative (WT1 250 copies), with a median OS and DFS not reached in the WT1-negative group and 10.2 and 5.5 months, respectively, in the WT1-positive group (OS log\u2013rank p = 0.0005; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.5\u20139; DFS log\u2013rank p = 0.0001; HR = 4.38, 95% CI = 1.9\u201310). Patients with cCR who were WT1-positive had the same negative outcome as those with a cytological evidence of disease. The relapse rate after allo-SCT was 9% (3/33) in pre-allo-SCT WT1-negative cases and 54% (7/13) in WT1-positive cases (p = 0.002). At multivariate analysis, WT1 negativity before allo-SCT and grade <2 acute graft versus host disease were the only independent prognostic factors for improved OS and DFS. These data show that pre-allo-SCT molecular MRD evaluation through WT1 expression is a powerful predictor of posttransplantation outcomes (OS, DFS, relapse rate). Patients with both cCR and a WT1-negative marker before allo-SCT have a very good outcome with very low relapse rate; conversely, patients with positive molecular MRD and refractory/relapsed patients have a negative outcome. The WT1 MRD stratification in FLT3-positive AML is a valuable tool with which to identify patients who are at high risk of relapse and that could be considered from post-allo-SCT prophylaxis with FLT3 inhibitors or other strategies (donor lymphocyte infusion, tapering of immunosuppression, azacitidine). \ua9 2017 ISEH - International Society for Experimental Hematolog

Infliximab treatment for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

Background and Objectives. Tumor necrosis factor \u3b1 is one of the principal cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of acute graft-versus-host- disease (GVHD). Infliximab is an antibody to this cytokine. Design and Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the activity of infliximab in 32 patients with severe steroid-refractory acute GVHD. The patients received a median of 3 weekly courses of infliximab. The main organs involved in the patients were skin (n=2) liver (n=1), bowel (n=19), liver and bowel at the same stage (n=10). Results. Nineteen out 32 patients (59%) responded to infliximab with 6 (19%) complete and 13 (40%) partial responses. Age younger than 35 years, intestinal involvement and a longer time between hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and infliximab administration were factors predicting a favorable response. Infective episodes developed in 23/32 (72%) patients. All the 13 unresponsive patients died of GVHD shortly after infliximab. Thirteen of 19 responsive patients were alive at a median follow-up of 449 days (range 155-842) after infliximab, with no signs of chronic GVHD (n=5), limited (n=5) or extensive involvement (n=3). Six patients who responded subsequently died, one of chronic lung GVHD, the others of vascular complications or infections (2 fungal diseases). Interpretation and Conclusions. We conclude that infliximab is active in the treatment of severe steroid-refractory acute GVHD, particularly when the intestine is involved. Infections commonly followed its administration. The clinical activity of infliximab and the possibility that it increases the risk of infections are worth investigating in prospective trials

The role of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose integrated with computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Positron emission tomography (PET) integrated with computed tomography (PET/CT) has been reported to be useful for screening myelomatous lesions at diagnosis in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and for monitoring response to autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT). The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of PET/CT in MM patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Patients who underwent upfront auto-SCT followed by allo-SCT, either as consolidation or salvage treatment, were studied with PET/CT before and/or within 6 months after allo-SCT. The number, the maximum standard uptake value (SUV), and the location (medullary or extramedullary) of focal lesions (FLs) were recorded and investigated as predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by univariate and multivariate analyses. Fifty-four patients had a PET/CT scan before allo-SCT. Of these, 22 patients (41%) had a negative PET/CT scan, 11 patients (20%) showed 1 to 3 FLs, and 21 patients (39%) had either a diffuse bone marrow involvement or more than 3 FLs. SUV was >4.2 in 21 patients (39%) and extramedullary disease (EMD) was present in 6 patients (11%). Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors before allo-SCT showed that persistence of EMD at transplantation was an independent predictor of poor PFS, whereas OS was negatively influenced by unrelated donor and SUV > 4.2. Fifty-nine patients had a PET/CT scan within 6 months after allo-SCT. Multivariate analysis of post-treatment variables showed that persistence of EMD and failure to obtain complete response or very good partial response after allo-SCT were strongly associated with shorter PFS and OS. Of the 46 patients with evaluable PET/CT scans both before and 6 months after allo-SCT, the 23 patients who maintained or reached a PET complete remission showed a significantly prolonged PFS and OS compared with the 23 patients with persistence of any PET positivity (2-year PFS: 51% versus 25%, P = .03; 2-year OS: 81% versus 47%, P = .001). This study indicates that PET/CT imaging before and after allo-SCT is significantly associated with the outcome, suggesting the utility of this technique for MM staging before allo-SCT and for response monitoring after the transplantation