6 research outputs found
Bat community data for 15 landscapes in southeastern Brazil
All information on bats was collected in the field by Renata Muylaert. Metadata is described on file
Network layers formed by interactions between ants and plants with extrafloral nectaries, trophobionts, and flowers.
<p>Circles represent plant species and diamonds represent ant species. Lines represent interactions between species and line thickness is proportional to interaction frequency. See ant and plant species codes in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0167161#pone.0167161.s001" target="_blank">S1</a> and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0167161#pone.0167161.s002" target="_blank">S2</a> Tables, respectively.</p
Few Ant Species Play a Central Role Linking Different Plant Resources in a Network in Rupestrian Grasslands
<div><p>Ant-plant associations are an outstanding model to study the entangled ecological interactions that structure communities. However, most studies of plant-animal networks focus on only one type of resource that mediates these interactions (e.g, nectar or fruits), leading to a biased understanding of community structure. New approaches, however, have made possible to study several interaction types simultaneously through multilayer networks models. Here, we use this approach to ask whether the structural patterns described to date for ant-plant networks hold when multiple interactions with plant-derived food rewards are considered. We tested whether networks characterized by different resource types differ in specialization and resource partitioning among ants, and whether the identity of the core ant species is similar among resource types. We monitored ant interactions with extrafloral nectaries, flowers, and fruits, as well as trophobiont hemipterans feeding on plants, for one year, in seven rupestrian grassland (<i>campo rupestre</i>) sites in southeastern Brazil. We found a highly tangled ant-plant network in which plants offering different resource types are connected by a few central ant species. The multilayer network had low modularity and specialization, but ant specialization and niche overlap differed according to the type of resource used. Beyond detecting structural differences across networks, our study demonstrates empirically that the core of most central ant species is similar across them. We suggest that foraging strategies of ant species, such as massive recruitment, may determine specialization and resource partitioning in ant-plant interactions. As this core of ant species is involved in multiple ecosystem functions, it may drive the diversity and evolution of the entire <i>campo rupestre</i> community.</p></div
Multilayer network formed by interactions between ants and plants that provide different food types.
<p>Circles represent plant species and diamonds represent ant species. Lines represent interactions and line thickness is proportional to interaction frequency. Line color represents the type of resource used. See ant and plant species names in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0167161#pone.0167161.s001" target="_blank">S1</a> and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0167161#pone.0167161.s002" target="_blank">S2</a> Tables, respectively.</p
Values for complementary specialization (H<sub>2</sub>’), modularity (Q), weighted nestedness (WNODF), niche overlap for ants (Horn), and their respective significances (P) for different layers in a multilayer ant-plant network.
<p>Values for complementary specialization (H<sub>2</sub>’), modularity (Q), weighted nestedness (WNODF), niche overlap for ants (Horn), and their respective significances (P) for different layers in a multilayer ant-plant network.</p
Nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordination (NMDS) showing the similarity of most central ant species (A), and central plant species (B) among resource layers in the multilayer ant-plant network.
<p>Points represent sampling sites and the polygons indicate significant differences (EFN = ant-extrafloral nectar, Flower = ant-flower, Tropho = ant-trophobiont).</p