21 research outputs found

    Control of Alzheimer's Amyloid Beta Toxicity by the High Molecular Weight Immunophilin FKBP52 and Copper Homeostasis in Drosophila

    Get PDF
    FK506 binding proteins (FKBPs), also called immunophilins, are prolyl-isomerases (PPIases) that participate in a wide variety of cellular functions including hormone signaling and protein folding. Recent studies indicate that proteins that contain PPIase activity can also alter the processing of Alzheimer's Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP). Originally identified in hematopoietic cells, FKBP52 is much more abundantly expressed in neurons, including the hippocampus, frontal cortex, and basal ganglia. Given the fact that the high molecular weight immunophilin FKBP52 is highly expressed in CNS regions susceptible to Alzheimer's, we investigated its role in Aβ toxicity. Towards this goal, we generated Aβ transgenic Drosophila that harbor gain of function or loss of function mutations of FKBP52. FKBP52 overexpression reduced the toxicity of Aβ and increased lifespan in Aβ flies, whereas loss of function of FKBP52 exacerbated these Aβ phenotypes. Interestingly, the Aβ pathology was enhanced by mutations in the copper transporters Atox1, which interacts with FKBP52, and Ctr1A and was suppressed in FKBP52 mutant flies raised on a copper chelator diet. Using mammalian cultures, we show that FKBP52 (−/−) cells have increased intracellular copper and higher levels of Aβ. This effect is reversed by reconstitution of FKBP52. Finally, we also found that FKBP52 formed stable complexes with APP through its FK506 interacting domain. Taken together, these studies identify a novel role for FKBP52 in modulating toxicity of Aβ peptides

    Production of H<sub>2</sub>S is downregulated in replicatively senescent cells.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Representative images of SA-β-Gal staining in young (PD: 5.9) and senescent (PD: 18.8) aHDF cells. Scale bars, 100 μm. (<b>B</b>) Real-time PCR analysis of expression of <i>hTERT</i> in young (PD: 5.9) and senescent (PD: 18.8) aHDF cells. The expression of <i>hTERT</i> was normalized to the expression level of <i>β-ACTIN</i>. (<b>C</b>) NAD/NADH ratio in young (PD: 5.9) and senescent (PD: 18.8) aHDF cells. Real-time PCR analysis of expression of <i>CBS</i> (<b>D</b>), <i>MST</i> (<b>E</b>), and <i>CSE</i> (<b>F</b>) in young (PD: 5.9) and senescent (PD: 18.8) aHDF cells. The expression of <i>CBS</i>, <i>MST</i>, and <i>CSE</i> was normalized to the expression level of <i>β-ACTIN</i>. (<b>G</b>) 1 x 10<sup>6</sup> cells of young (PD: 5.9) and senescent (PD: 18.8) aHDF cells were incubated in PBS at 37°C for 1 hour and then H<sub>2</sub>S was measured in culture supernatants. Mean values are shown along with error bars. *; <i>p</i><0.05, **; <i>p</i><0.005, ***; <i>p</i><0.0005, n.s.; not significant.</p

    NaHS-treatment increases expression of <i>NAMPT</i> and <i>SIRT1</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b> and <b>B</b>) The expression of <i>NAMPT</i> and <i>SIRT1</i> in young (PD: 5.9) and senescent (PD: 18.8) was assessed by real-time PCR and normalized to the expression level of <i>β-ACTIN</i>. (<b>C</b>) Immunoblotting of Nampt and Sirt1 in young (PD: 5.9) and senescent (PD: 18.8) aHDF cells. β-Actin was used as a loading control. (<b>D</b> and <b>E</b>) Young (PD: 5.9) aHDF cells were treated without and with NaHS for 3 days, and RNA samples were then subjected to real-time PCR for assessment of <i>NAMPT</i> and <i>SIRT1</i>. The expression levels of <i>NAMPT</i> and <i>SIRT1</i> were normalized to the levels of expression of <i>β-ACTIN</i>. (<b>F</b>) Immunoblotting of Nampt and Sirt1 in NaHS-treated young (PD: 5.9) aHDF cells. β-Actin was used as a loading control. (<b>G</b>) NAD/NADH ratio in young (PD: 5.9) aHDF cells treated without and with NaHS for 7 days. Data were normalized to the total amount of protein.</p

    Exogenous H<sub>2</sub>S increases PD and suppresses SA-β-Gal expression.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) PD of cells treated without or with 1 μM NaHS. The population doubling of the first confluent cultures was designated as 0. (<b>B</b>) Representative images of SA–β-Gal staining in cells shown in Fig 3A. Mean values ± error bars of number of SA-β-Gal positive cells are shown on the right-upper corner of each image. *; p<0.05, ***; p<0.0005, n.s.; not significant. Scale bars, 100 μm.</p

    Exogenous H<sub>2</sub>S increases the expression of <i>hTERT</i> as well as the activity of telomerase.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Real-time PCR analysis of the expression of <i>hTERT</i> in young (PD: 5.9) aHDF cells, treated with NaHS for 3 days. The expression of <i>hTERT</i> was normalized to the level of expression of <i>β-ACTIN</i>. Expression of untreated control was regarded as 1.0. (<b>B</b>) Immunoblotting of hTERT in aHDF cells without or with 1 μM NaHS for 7 days. 100 μg of the indicated nuclear extracts were subjected for immunoblotting. β-Actin was used as a loading control. (<b>C</b>) Telomerase activity in young (PD: 3.2) aHDF cells without or with treated with 1 μM NaHS for 7 days. Positive control was MDA-MB-231 cell lysate, and negative control was buffer alone. Bottom panel shows quantified means ± error bars from three independent assays. Relative activity of telomerase was calculated by dividing the density of all ladders to the density of the bands in internal control, indicated as internal control (I.C.).</p

    H<sub>2</sub>S induces <i>hTERT</i> expression in a NAMPT/SIRT1-dependent manner.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b> and <b>B</b>) Downregulation of <i>SIRT1</i> suppresses the expression of <i>hTERT</i>. Young (PD: 5.9) aHDF cells (3 x 10<sup>5</sup> cells) were transfected with <i>SIRT1</i> siRNA for 2 days, and these were treated without or with NaHS for 3 days. Total RNAs from these cells were subjected to real-time PCR analysis for <i>SIRT1</i> (<b>A</b>) and <i>hTERT</i> (<b>B</b>). Data were normalized to the level of expression of <i>β-ACTIN</i>. The expression level of <i>SIRT1</i> and <i>hTERT</i> in cells treated with Scrambled siRNA without NaHS treatment was regarded as 1.0. (<b>C</b>) Downregulation of <i>NAMPT</i> suppresses the activity of SIRT1. Young (PD: 5.9) aHDF cells (3 x 10<sup>5</sup> cells) were transfected with <i>NAMPT</i> siRNA for 2 days, and then the cells were treated without or with 1 μM NaHS for 3 days. Nuclear proteins were extracted and used for measurement of SIRT1 activity. Mean values ± error bars were normalized to the amount of total cell protein. (<b>D</b>) Mode of action of H<sub>2</sub>S in opposing senescence. *; <i>p</i><0.05, **; <i>p</i><0.005, ***; <i>p</i><0.0005, n.s.; not significant.</p

    Damage-Recovered (DR) cells show increase in H<sub>2</sub>S and proliferation rate and exhibit tolerance to damage.

    No full text
    <p>(A) A scheme for isolation of Damage-Recovered (DR) cells. (B) Bax expression in H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> treated Pc, DR<sup>H2O2 W1</sup>, DR<sup>H2O2 W2</sup> and DR<sup>H2O2 W3</sup> HepG2 cells. (C) Amount of H<sub>2</sub>S released by DR<sup>H2O2 W1</sup>, DR<sup>H2O2 W2</sup> and DR<sup>H2O2 W3</sup> HepG2 cells. Significance between Pc and three DR cells was <i>p</i><0.0005 in ANOVA statistical analysis. (D) H<sub>2</sub>S staining of Pc, DR<sup>H2O2 W1</sup>, DR<sup>H2O2 W2</sup> and DR<sup>H2O2 W3</sup> HepG2 cells with 5 µM H<sub>2</sub>S fluorescent probe, HSN2. Scale bars, 50 µm. (E) PCR analysis of <i>CBS</i>, <i>CTH</i> and <i>MTS</i> genes in Pc, DR<sup>H2O2 W1</sup> and DR<sup>H2O2 W3</sup> HepG2 cells. (F) Western blot analysis of CBS and CTH in Pc, DR<sup>H2O2 W1</sup>, DR<sup>H2O2 W2</sup> and DR<sup>H2O2 W3</sup> HepG2 cells. (G) Western blot analysis of CBS in Pc and DR<sup>H2O2 W1</sup>, DR<sup>H W1</sup> and DR<sup>G W1</sup> HepG2 cells. (H) Proliferation of HepG2 recovered from H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, DR<sup>H2O2 W1</sup>, DR<sup>H2O2 W2</sup> cells as a percentage of that in Pc cells. (I) Viability of Pc, DR<sup>H2O2 W1</sup> and DR<sup>H2O2 W2</sup> HepG2 cells with and without treatment with bleomycin. *; <i>p</i><0.05,**; <i>p</i><0.005, ***; <i>p</i><0.0005.</p

    A H<sub>2</sub>S-Nampt Dependent Energetic Circuit Is Critical to Survival and Cytoprotection from Damage in Cancer Cells

    No full text
    <div><p>We recently demonstrated that cancer cells that recover from damage exhibit increased aerobic glycolysis, however, the molecular mechanism by which cancer cells survive the damage and show increased aerobic glycolysis remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that diverse cancer cells that survive hypoxic or oxidative damage show rapid cell proliferation, and develop tolerance to damage associated with increased production of hydrogen sulfide (H<sub>2</sub>S) which drives up-regulation of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (Nampt). Consistent with existence of a H<sub>2</sub>S-Nampt energetic circuit, in damage recovered cancer cells, H<sub>2</sub>S, Nampt and ATP production exhibit a significant correlation. Moreover, the treatment of cancer cells with H<sub>2</sub>S donor, NaHS, coordinately increases Nampt and ATP levels, and protects cells from drug induced damage. Inhibition of cystathionine beta synthase (CBS) or cystathionase (CTH), enzymes which drive generation of H<sub>2</sub>S, decreases Nampt production while suppression of Nampt pathway by FK866, decreases H<sub>2</sub>S and ATP levels. Damage recovered cells isolated from tumors grown subcutaneously in athymic mice also show increased production of H<sub>2</sub>S, Nampt and ATP levels, associated with increased glycolysis and rapid proliferation. Together, these data show that upon recovery from potential lethal damage, H<sub>2</sub>S-Nampt directs energy expenditure and aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells, leads to their exponential growth, and causes a high degree of tolerance to damage. Identification of H<sub>2</sub>S-Nampt as a pathway responsible for induction of damage tolerance in cancer cells may underlie resistance to therapy and offers the opportunity to target this pathway as a means in treatment of cancer.</p></div
    corecore