Meeting report: "Nachhaltig Wirken - Reallabore in der Transformation"; Conference, 2022, Karlsruhe

Der Reallaboransatz hat seit seinem Aufkommen 2012 einen richtiggehenden Boom erfahren. Reallabore sind in ihrem originären Ansatz als Experimentierräume, Forschungsmodus und methodologisches Werkzeug konzipiert, um zu nachhaltiger Entwicklung und gesellschaftlicher Transformation beizutragen und diese zu beschleunigen. Wesentlicher Ansatzpunkt ist dabei, Wissenschaft und Praxis in transdisziplinären Settings und transformativen Prozessen eng miteinander zu verknüpfen. Die Wissenschaft bzw. die Forschenden, begeben sich dabei selbst in Wandlungsprozesse: Sie initiieren, experimentieren und beforschen zugleich. Praxisakteure setzen dabei Themen und forschen aktiv mit, so dass im Idealfall sowohl wissenschaftliche Theorie als auch gesellschaftliche Praxis von den Ergebnissen profitieren. Die Ausgestaltung von Reallaborprojekten hat in den letzten zehn Jahren eine Vielzahl von Differenzierungen in Inhalten, Settings, Methodik und Ausrichtung erfahren. Die Konferenz "Nachhaltig wirken: Reallabore in der Transformation", die am 2. und 3. Juni 2022 in Karlsruhe stattfand, griff diese Entwicklungen auf, um gemeinsam mit der wachsenden Reallabor-Community den aktuellen Entwicklungsstand des Reallaboransatzes abzubilden. Organisiert vom Karlsruher Transformationszentrum für Nachhaltigkeit und Kulturwandel (KAT) in Zusammenarbeit mit den Gründungsinstitutionen des Netzwerkes Reallabore der Nachhaltigkeit, wurden auf der Tagung aktuelle methodische, konzeptionelle, praktische wie auch strategische Fragen aufgeworfen und diskutiert. Mit über 300 Teilnehmenden und 115 Beiträgen stellt sie die bislang größte und umfassendste Veranstaltung im Bereich der deutschsprachigen Reallaborforschung dar

Efetividade de escovas dentais de baixo custo, com ou sem o uso de dentifrício, na remoção da placa bacteriana em dentes decíduos

O principal objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a efetividade de uma escova dental de baixo custo (monobloco) à efetividade de uma escova convencional, com ou sem adição de dentifrício, em relação à remoção da placa dentária.Participaram deste estudo trinta e duas crianças de 4 a 6 anos de idade, que foram avaliadas sob quatro condições experimentais, definidas pela combinação de dois fatores: escova dental (convencional ou monobloco) e uso de dentifrício (com ou sem dentifrício). A efetividade dos tratamentos foi definida em termos de redução do índice de placa bacteriana, avaliado antes e após a escovação.Não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os dois tipos de escovas no que diz respeito à redução de placa bacteriana. Similarmente, não houve evidências estatísticas de que o uso de dentifrício aumenta o controle mecânico da placa. Esses resultados são importantes do ponto de vista de saúde pública, principalmente em países em desenvolvimento, onde a disseminação de técnicas educacionais e preventivas de baixo custo são fundamentais.The main objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a low cost toothbrush ("monoblock") to that of a conventional toothbrush with and without addition of dentifrice with respect to the removal of dental plaque. Thirty-two 4- to 6-year-old children took part in this study: they were evaluated under four experimental conditions defined by the combinations of the values of two factors, toothbrush (conventional or monoblock) and use of dentifrice (with or without). The effectiveness of the treatments was defined in terms of the reduction of a bacterial plaque index evaluated before and after toothbrushing. No statistically significant differences were detected between the two types of toothbrushes with respect to the reduction of the bacterial plaque index. Similarly, there were no statistical evidences that the use of dentifrice improves the mechanical control of dental plaque. These results are important from a public health point of view, specially in developing countries, where the dissemination of educational and preventive techniques of low cost are fundamental

Health, Nutrition and Healthcare Availability (Survey 2, Report 2)

With support and collaboration from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation through the America Healing initiative, researchers at the University of Michigan are leading the National Voices Project (NVP) from 2011-2015. The central goals of the NVP are to examine the sources of racial/ethnic inequity and other disparities for children in the United States today, identify interventions that address disparities effectively, and inform the public dialogue about racial healing and racial equality. The NVP offers a fresh perspective on community-level opportunities for children throughout the country, in the domains of health and nutrition, education, and economic security -- through the eyes of adults whose work and volunteer efforts affect such opportunities. In other words, the NVP reflects the perceptions of individuals throughout the United States who are in a position to improve children's opportunities in the future. The questionnaire for NVP Survey 2 was developed by the National Voices Project team at the University of Michigan, with input from WKKF collaborators. We examined how individuals who work or volunteer with children view opportunities for education, health and healthcare, and economic well-being related to children and adolescents. Many of the questions were identical to questions fielded for NVP Survey 1 in 2011, to facilitate comparisons of responses across these different samples and over time. New questions in NVP Survey 2 centered on respondents' perceptions of segregation and inequities in the communities they know best, and on respondents' awareness about efforts to bridge racial/ethnic inequities in those communities

Education and Learning Opportunities (Survey 2, Report 3)

With support and collaboration from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation through the America Healing initiative, researchers at the University of Michigan are leading the National Voices Project (NVP) from 2011-2016. The central goals of the NVP are to examine the sources of racial/ethnic inequity and other disparities for children in the United States today, identify interventions that address disparities effectively, and inform the public dialogue about racial healing and racial equality.The NVP offers a fresh perspective on community-level opportunities for children throughout the country, in the domains of health and nutrition, education, and economic security – through the eyes of adults whose work and volunteer efforts affect such opportunities. In other words, the NVP reflects the perceptions of individuals throughout the United States who are in a position to improve children?s opportunities in the future.NVP Survey 1 was conducted in November-December 2011. NVP Survey 2 was fielded in August-September 2012. NVP Survey 2 differed from NVP Survey 1 in two key respects: 1) NVP Survey 2 included an oversample in communities included in the "Place Matters" initiative led by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a fellow grantee of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. The oversample included sufficient numbers of responses to permit the NVP team to analyze differences across 6 specific "Place Matters" counties, and 2) Questions were asked in greater depth about efforts at community levels about bridging efforts to address racial/ethnic inequities.

Opportunities and Barriers Related to Income (Survey 2, Report 4)

Led by researchers at the University of Michigan, the National Voices Project is an effort to bring the perspectives of thousands of people in communities across the United States to the national dialogue about opportunities and barriers for children related to race/ethnicity. The National Voices Project conducts major national surveys twice each yearamong adults who work and volunteer on behalf of children. These surveys focus on racial/ethnic disparities at the community level that affect children?s health, education, and economic security.NVP Survey 1 was conducted in November-December 2011. NVP Survey 2 was fielded in August-September 2012.The final eligible sample for NVP Survey 2 included 2,311 adults from 48 states and D.C. NVP Survey 2 differed from NVP Survey 1 in two key respects: 1) NVP Survey 2 included an oversample in communities included in the "Place Matters" initiative led by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a fellow grantee of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. The oversample included sufficient numbers of responses to permit the NVP team to analyze differences across 6 specific "Place Matters" counties, and 2) Questions were asked in greater depth about efforts at community levels about bridging efforts to address racial/ethnic inequities.

Avaliação clínica de um cimento de ionômero de vidro utilizado como selante oclusal: a clinical evaluation

Since fluoride’s properties are widely known in the field of Preventive Dentistry, fluoride-releasing materials have been extensively investigated. Among the occlusal sealants, there is great expectation regarding the results that can be achieved with light-curing glass-ionomer cements due to their excellent properties. The aim of this study was to assess the use of one of these cements, Vitremer (3M) as an occlusal sealant. The material was applied using two different techniques; either associated or not with an adhesive system. After 6 and 12 months of observation, an evaluation was performed in 159 teeth to verify its retention as well as the presence of caries lesions. The technique that included the adhesive system showed better retention than the conventional one. Total retention was 84.9% for the experimental technique and 37.2% for the conventional technique after 12 months. There was no difference between bicuspids and molars regarding retention. Caries lesion was observed in a single tooth, for which a total loss of material was observed after one year.Sabendo-se do papel do flúor na Odontologia Preventiva, cada vez mais procuram-se materiais restauradores com propriedades de liberação deste íon. Dentre os selantes oclusais, grande expectativa existe em relação aos cimentos de ionômero de vidro, particularmente os fotopolimerizáveis, por possuírem melhores propriedades. O objetivo deste trabalho foi testar um destes cimentos, Vitremer (3M), aplicado em: combinação ou não com um adesivo. A avaliação foi realizada em 159 dentes, 6 e 12 meses após a aplicação do selante, observando-se sua retenção e a presença ou ausência de lesão de cárie. Concluiu-se que a técnica modificada, com adesivo, propiciou significativamente melhor retenção após 6 e 12 meses que a técnica convencional, não havendo diferença entre molares e pré-molares. Apenas um dente do grupo sem adesivo desenvolveu lesão de cárie após a perda do material

Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19 (REMED trial)—study protocol for a prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Since December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 virus has infected millions of people worldwide. In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in need of oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation, dexamethasone 6 mg per day is currently recommended. However, the dose of 6 mg of dexamethasone is currently being reappraised and may miss important therapeutic potential or may prevent potential deleterious effects of higher doses of corticosteroids. METHODS: REMED is a prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial testing the superiority of dexamethasone 20 mg (dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1-5, followed by dexamethasone 10 mg on days 6-10) vs 6 mg administered once daily intravenously for 10 days in adult patients with moderate or severe ARDS due to confirmed COVID-19. Three hundred participants will be enrolled and followed up for 360 days after randomization. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio into one of the two treatment arms. The following stratification factors will be applied: age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, CRP levels and trial centre. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) at 28 days after randomisation. The secondary endpoints are mortality from any cause at 60 days after randomisation; dynamics of the inflammatory marker, change in WHO Clinical Progression Scale at day 14; and adverse events related to corticosteroids and independence at 90 days after randomisation assessed by the Barthel Index. The long-term outcomes of this study are to assess long-term consequences on mortality and quality of life at 180 and 360 days. The study will be conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of ten university hospitals in the Czech Republic. DISCUSSION: We aim to compare two different doses of dexamethasone in patients with moderate to severe ARDS undergoing mechanical ventilation regarding efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT No. 2020-005887-70. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04663555. Registered on December 11, 2020