Hepatitis C virus genotypes in blood donors from the Federal District, Central Brazil

The objective of this study was to characterize hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in blood donors from the Federal District, Central Brazil, and to compare HCV screening by serological assays and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Plasma samples from 57 individuals with reactive or indeterminate results in serological anti-HCV screening assays (ELISA or EIA) were tested for HCV RNA by RT-PCR. The results from a confirmatory LIA serological assay were also evaluated. The 5' non-coding region of the HCV genome was amplified from 41 PCR positive samples (71.9%), which were further characterized by nucleotide sequencing analysis. Of these, 60.9% were of HCV genotype 1 and 39.1% of genotype 3

Antiretroviral resistance and genetic diversity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from the Federal District, Central Brazil

In the context of universal access to antiretroviral therapy, the surveillance of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genetic diversity and resistance becomes pivotal. In this work our purpose was to describe the genetic variability; prevalence of drug-resistance mutations; and genotypic resistance profiles in HIV-1 infected individuals under antiretroviral treatment, from the Federal District, Brasília, Central Brazil. The entire viral protease and codons 19 to 234 of the reverse transcriptase gene from 45 HIV-1 isolates were amplified and sequenced for subtyping and genotyping. By phylogenetic analysis, 96% of the samples clustered with subtype B and the remaining 4% with HIV-1 subtype F sequences. One major protease inhibitor resistance-associated mutation, I50V, was detected in 38% of the samples. Minor mutations were also found at the protease gene: L10I/V (7%), K20M (2%), M36I (11%), L63P (20%), A71T (2%), and V77I (7%). Many mutations associated with reduced susceptibility to nucleoside or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were detected: M41L (11%), E44D (4%), D67N (11%), T69D (2%), K70R (11%), L74V (2%), L100I (4%), K103N (18%), V118I (9%), Y181C (11%), M184V (18%), G190A (4%), T215Y (4%), and K219E (4%). This study has shown that 84% of the studied population from the Federal District, showing evidences of therapy failure, presented viral genomic mutations associated with drug resistance. The main antiretrovirals to which this population showed resistance were the PI amprenavir (38%), the NNRTIs delavirdine, nevirapine (31%), and efavirenz (24%), and the NRTIs lamivudine (18%), abacavir, and zidovudine (13%)

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AIM: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery. METHODS: This was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin. RESULTS: Overall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). After adjustment, delay was not associated with a lower rate of complete resection (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90-1.55, P = 0.224), which was consistent in elective patients only (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.27, P = 0.672). Longer delays were not associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: One in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease

Estudo de casos hospitalizados por pneumonia comunitária no período de um ano A study of community-acquired pneumonia inpatients in a period of a year

Introdução: Apesar dos avanços obtidos nos métodos propedêuticos, cerca de 50% dos casos de pneumonia adquirida na comunidade não têm sua etiologia esclarecida, inclusive os hospitalizados. Apesar disso, a terapêutica adequada proporciona baixas taxas de mortalidade na maioria dos casos. Objetivos: Descrever a epidemiologia, formas de apresentação, o rendimento dos testes diagnósticos, a permanência hospitalar, a morbidade e mortalidade de 42 pacientes consecutivos, internados para tratamento de PAC. Métodos: Foram incluídos pacientes com quadro clínico compatível com PAC, opacidade radiológica pulmonar recente e com dois itens entre febre, tosse produtiva e leucocitose. A solicitação de exames complementares obedeceu à necessidade de cada caso. Resultados: Dos 42 pacientes, com idade de 64,7 ± 16,8 anos, 27 (64,3%) masculinos, 27 (64%) apresentavam co-morbidades. Dezessete (40,5%) estavam em uso de antibióticos à admissão. Pneumonia grave ocorreu em oito casos (19%); não houve diferença quanto à gravidade (p = 0,57) e permanência hospitalar (p = 0,25) entre os grupos > de 60 ou <= de 60 anos. A permanência hospitalar média foi de 14,3 ± 7,6 dias. Diagnóstico etiológico definitivo foi obtido em três casos: Legionella sp em dois, S. aureus em um caso. Em 31 (74%), manteve-se o antibiótico inicial; em 11 (26%) houve troca, seis (54,5%) devido à má resposta clínica e cinco (45,5%) devido ao resultado microbiológico. Hemoculturas foram feitas em 16 casos (38%), positivas em apenas um (6,3%). Nove amostras de escarro (9/22, 41%) foram validadas. Ocorreu um óbito (2,4%), por pneumonia grave, em um paciente com neoplasia. Conclusões: O diagnóstico etiológico em PAC, mesmo em internados, é obtido em uma minoria de casos, contribuindo para isso o uso concorrente de antibióticos. A terapêutica empírica adequada proporciona baixas taxas de mortalidade. Os testes diagnósticos devem ser empregados de maneira individualizada.<br>Introduction: Besides the improvement we have had in the diagnostic methods, the causative agent in around 50% of the cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains unknown, even in inpatients. Despite that, adequate empirical therapy results in low mortality in the majority of the cases. Goals: To describe the epidemiology, the clinical presentation, the utility of diagnostic tests, the duration of hospital stay, the morbidity and mortality rates of 42 consecutive inpatients with CAP. Methods: The inclusion criteria were the presence of a recent pulmonar infiltrate in the CXR and two items out of fever (38ºC), productive cough and leukocytosis (> 10,000/mm³), in the presence of a compatible clinical syndrome. The subsidiary tests were performed as required on individual basis. Results: Forty-two patients, aged 64.7 ± 16.8 years, 27 (64.3%) male, were studied. Twenty-seven (64%) had subjacent illness. Seventeen (40.5%) were on antimicrobial therapy on admission. There were eight cases (19%) of severe pneumonia; the patients aged > 60 or <= 60 years were similar concerning the severity of presentation (p = 0.57) and had similar hospital stay (p = 0.25). The mean global hospital stay was 14.3 ± 7.6 days. Definite etiologic diagnosis were done in three patients: Legionella sp (2), S. aureus (1). In thirty-one cases (73.8%) the antimicrobial therapy wasn't modified; when it happened (11 patients, 26.2%), the main reason was the bad outcome in six cases (54.5%); in five (45.5%), the microbiological result prompted the change in therapy. Blood samples were drawn in 16 cases (38%), being positive in only one (6.3%). There were nine adequate sputum samples for analysis (9/22, 41%). There was only one death (2.4%), due to severe pneumonia in a patient with a neoplastic disease. Conclusion: The etiologic diagnosis in CAP is reached in a minority of cases, even in inpatients. At least partly, this is probably due to the previous use of antimicrobial drugs. Adequate empirical therapy results in low mortality. Diagnostic tests can be performed on individual basis