18 research outputs found

    Laparoscopic Repair of a Large Paraesophageal Hernia with Migration of the Stomach into the Mediastinum Creating an Upside-Down Stomach

    Get PDF
    Upside-down stomach is a relatively rare type of a large paraesophageal hernia characterized by the migration of the stomach into the posterior mediastinum. Upside-down stomach is prone to severe complications and therefore surgery is recommended even in asymptomatic patients. A 62-year-old male presented with frequent abdominal pain with nausea and vomiting that persisted for one year. The patient was obese with fatty liver and was treated medically for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) for 4 years. On upper gastrointestinal CT study a level-IV paraesophageal hernia was detected with upside-down stomach, and he was referred for elective surgery. Laparoscopic surgery included reduction of the stomach into the abdominal cavity followed by dissection of the paraesophageal membrane and hernia sac. The hiatal defect was closed using a wound closure device and nonabsorbable sutures. The defect closure was reinforced using Physiomesh tucked anteriorly and sutured posteriorly to the diaphragm. Follow-up was uneventful and the patient is free of complaints. The results of this surgical intervention support previous reports that laparoscopic repair with the use of biological mesh in the setting of large paraesophageal hernia should be favorably considered

    Endoscopically stapled diverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum: results of a multidisciplinary team approach

    No full text
    Abstract Background A variety of open and endoscopic surgical approaches for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum have been described. In recent years, growing evidence has shown that the endoscopic techniques are superior to the open approaches in many aspects. Among the endoscopic techniques, endoscopically stapled diverticulostomy (ESD) appears to have better efficacy and safety than the other endoscopic techniques. Methods This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all the patients with Zenker's diverticulum treated surgically by the same team, which involved an ear, nose, and throat surgeon and an endoscopic surgeon. Results From January 2002 to March 2008, 55 consecutive patients with Zenker's diverticulum underwent 60 ESDs. The mean follow-up time was 32.6 months (range, 1-72 months). The mean operative time was 21.8 min (range, 5-45 min), and the average hospital stay was 2.24 days (range, 1-30 days). The treatment was technically feasible for 51 patients (93%), and initial symptom relief without recurrence was achieved for 46 patients (90.2%) after a single procedure. Five patients with recurrent symptoms underwent a successful revision ESD, with a 100% success rate among the patients for whom the procedure was technically feasible. Only two major postoperative complications (3.64%) occurred: one esophageal perforation and pneumomediastinum and one severe esophageal edema. Both patients had complete resolution of their complications with conservative treatment and no long-term sequela. Conclusion The findings showed endoscopic stapled diverticulostomy to be both safe and effective. Compared with the historical results of open diverticulectomy and myotomy, the reported procedure has fewer complications and better outcomes and should become the procedure of choice for the treatment of most patients with a diagnosis of Zenker's diverticulum

    Bariatric surgery in patients with type 1 diabetes: special considerations are warranted

    No full text
    Objective: We examined short and long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with obesity and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods: We reviewed the records of all adults insured by Maccabi Healthcare Services during 2010 -2015, with body mass index (BMI) ⩾30 kg/m2 and T1DM; and compared weight reduction and glucose control according to the performance of bariatric surgery. BMI and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were extracted for baseline and every 6 months, for a mean 3.5 years. Results: Of 52 patients, 26(50%) underwent bariatric surgery. Those who underwent surgery were more often female and with a longer duration of diabetes. Immediately postoperative, 4(15%) developed diabetic ketoacidosis, while 6(23%) experienced severe hypoglycemic episodes. The mean BMI decreased among surgery patients: from 39.5±4.4 to 30.1±5.0 kg/m2 ( p < 0.0001); and increased among those who did not undergo surgery: from 33.6±3.9 to 35.1±4.4 kg/m2 ( p = 0.49). The mean HbA1c level decreased during the first 6 months postoperative: from 8.5±0.9% to 7.9±0.9%; however, at the end of follow-up, was similar to baseline, 8.6±2.0% (p = 0.87). For patients who did not undergo surgery, the mean HbA1c increased from 7.9±1.9% to 8.6±1.5% ( p = 0.09). Conclusions: Among individuals with obesity and T1DM, weight loss was successful after bariatric surgery, but glucose control did not improve. The postoperative risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemic episodes should be considering when performing bariatric surgery in this population

    The Effects of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Surgery on the Gastrointestinal Tract

    No full text
    One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an emerging bariatric procedure, yet data on its effect on the gastrointestinal tract are lacking. This study sought to evaluate the incidence of small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) following OAGB; explore its effect on nutritional, gastrointestinal, and weight outcomes; and assess post-OABG occurrence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) and altered gut microbiota composition. A prospective pilot cohort study of patients who underwent primary-OAGB surgery is here reported. The pre-surgical and 6-months-post-surgery measurements included anthropometrics, glucose breath-tests, biochemical tests, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality-of-life, dietary intake, and fecal sample collection. Thirty-two patients (50% females, 44.5 &plusmn; 12.3 years) participated in this study, and 29 attended the 6-month follow-up visit. The mean excess weight loss at 6 months post-OAGB was 67.8 &plusmn; 21.2%. The glucose breath-test was negative in all pre-surgery and positive in 37.0% at 6 months (p = 0.004). Positive glucose breath-test was associated with lower reported dietary intake and folate levels and higher vitamin A deficiency rates (p &le; 0.036). Fecal elastase-1 test (FE1) was negative for all pre-surgery and positive in 26.1% at 6 months (p = 0.500). Both alpha and beta diversity decreased at 6 months post-surgery compared to pre-surgery (p &le; 0.026). Relatively high incidences of SIBO and PEI were observed at 6 months post-OAGB, which may explain some gastrointestinal symptoms and nutritional deficiencies

    Gastrointestinal reported outcomes following one anastomosis gastric bypass based on a multicenter study

    No full text
    Objectives: To describe gastrointestinal-related side-effects reported following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB). Methods: A multicenter study among OAGB patients across Israel (n=277) and Portugal (n=111) who were recruited to the study based on time elapsed since surgery was performed. An online survey with information on demographics, anthropometrics, medical conditions, and gastrointestinal outcomes was administered in both countries simultaneously. Results: Respondents from Israel (pre-surgery age of 41.6±11.0 years, 75.8% females) and Portugal (pre-surgery age of 45.6±12.3 years, 79.3% females) presented mean excess weight loss of 51.0±19.9 and 62.4±26.5%, 89.0±22.0 and 86.2±21.4%, and 89.9±23.6 and 98.2±20.9% (P<0.001 for both countries), at 1-6 months, 6-12 months, and 1-5 years post-surgery, respectively. The Median Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale score was similar between time elapsed since surgery groups among respondents from Israel and Portugal (≤1.97 and ≤2.12). A notable proportion of respondents from Israel and Portugal at all time points reported 1-3 bowel movements per day (≤62.8 and ≤87.6%), Bristol stool scale categories which represent diarrhea-like stools (≤51.9 and ≤56.3%), having discomfort due to flatulence (≤79.4 and ≤90.2%), and mild to severe dyspepsia symptoms (≤50.5 and ≤73.0%). Conclusions: A notable proportion of OAGB patients might experience certain gastrointestinal symptoms postoperatively, including flatulence, dyspepsia, and diarrhea-like stools.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
    corecore