Fixed-parameter tractability, definability, and model checking

In this article, we study parameterized complexity theory from the perspective of logic, or more specifically, descriptive complexity theory. We propose to consider parameterized model-checking problems for various fragments of first-order logic as generic parameterized problems and show how this approach can be useful in studying both fixed-parameter tractability and intractability. For example, we establish the equivalence between the model-checking for existential first-order logic, the homomorphism problem for relational structures, and the substructure isomorphism problem. Our main tractability result shows that model-checking for first-order formulas is fixed-parameter tractable when restricted to a class of input structures with an excluded minor. On the intractability side, for every t >= 0 we prove an equivalence between model-checking for first-order formulas with t quantifier alternations and the parameterized halting problem for alternating Turing machines with t alternations. We discuss the close connection between this alternation hierarchy and Downey and Fellows' W-hierarchy. On a more abstract level, we consider two forms of definability, called Fagin definability and slicewise definability, that are appropriate for describing parameterized problems. We give a characterization of the class FPT of all fixed-parameter tractable problems in terms of slicewise definability in finite variable least fixed-point logic, which is reminiscent of the Immerman-Vardi Theorem characterizing the class PTIME in terms of definability in least fixed-point logic.Comment: To appear in SIAM Journal on Computin

Model-Checking Problems as a Basis for Parameterized Intractability

Most parameterized complexity classes are defined in terms of a parameterized version of the Boolean satisfiability problem (the so-called weighted satisfiability problem). For example, Downey and Fellow's W-hierarchy is of this form. But there are also classes, for example, the A-hierarchy, that are more naturally characterised in terms of model-checking problems for certain fragments of first-order logic. Downey, Fellows, and Regan were the first to establish a connection between the two formalisms by giving a characterisation of the W-hierarchy in terms of first-order model-checking problems. We improve their result and then prove a similar correspondence between weighted satisfiability and model-checking problems for the A-hierarchy and the W^*-hierarchy. Thus we obtain very uniform characterisations of many of the most important parameterized complexity classes in both formalisms. Our results can be used to give new, simple proofs of some of the core results of structural parameterized complexity theory.Comment: Changes in since v2: Metadata update

First-Order Provenance Games

We propose a new model of provenance, based on a game-theoretic approach to query evaluation. First, we study games G in their own right, and ask how to explain that a position x in G is won, lost, or drawn. The resulting notion of game provenance is closely related to winning strategies, and excludes from provenance all "bad moves", i.e., those which unnecessarily allow the opponent to improve the outcome of a play. In this way, the value of a position is determined by its game provenance. We then define provenance games by viewing the evaluation of a first-order query as a game between two players who argue whether a tuple is in the query answer. For RA+ queries, we show that game provenance is equivalent to the most general semiring of provenance polynomials N[X]. Variants of our game yield other known semirings. However, unlike semiring provenance, game provenance also provides a "built-in" way to handle negation and thus to answer why-not questions: In (provenance) games, the reason why x is not won, is the same as why x is lost or drawn (the latter is possible for games with draws). Since first-order provenance games are draw-free, they yield a new provenance model that combines how- and why-not provenance

Constituting Status: An Analysis of the Operation of Status in Perry v. Schwarzenegger

The recent Ninth Circuit decision in Perry v. Schwarzenegger marked a pivotal step forward for the gay rights movement. The decision is the first time a federal court has held that there is a right to same-sex marriage under the United States Constitution. Applying strict scrutiny, Judge Vaughn Walker found that Proposition 8's ban on same-sex marriage violated both substantive due process and equal protection (on the basis of sex and sexual orientation). While the constitutional merits of this decision are of great interest, I will leave such analysis to other scholars. Instead, I believe much can be gained by looking beneath the legal logic of the ruling, to the ideological paradigms that operate below the surface. By ideological paradigms, I do not mean merely the personal opinions of Judge Walker, but the larger societal attitudes and assumptions that manifest themselves within the text. Through a close reading of the opinion, I will examine the ways in which these ideologies interact and converge in often unexpected ways. In particular, I will track the ideological strands inherent in the concept of "status" and the ways in which that single word functions as the driving force behind the entire opinion

Die Titelbilder der "Bible historiale". Zwischen Standardisierung und Personalisierung

International audienc

First-Order Query Evaluation with Cardinality Conditions

We study an extension of first-order logic that allows to express cardinality conditions in a similar way as SQL's COUNT operator. The corresponding logic FOC(P) was introduced by Kuske and Schweikardt (LICS'17), who showed that query evaluation for this logic is fixed-parameter tractable on classes of structures (or databases) of bounded degree. In the present paper, we first show that the fixed-parameter tractability of FOC(P) cannot even be generalised to very simple classes of structures of unbounded degree such as unranked trees or strings with a linear order relation. Then we identify a fragment FOC1(P) of FOC(P) which is still sufficiently strong to express standard applications of SQL's COUNT operator. Our main result shows that query evaluation for FOC1(P) is fixed-parameter tractable with almost linear running time on nowhere dense classes of structures. As a corollary, we also obtain a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for counting the number of tuples satisfying a query over nowhere dense classes of structures

Finding Multiple New Optimal Locations in a Road Network

We study the problem of optimal location querying for location based services in road networks, which aims to find locations for new servers or facilities. The existing optimal solutions on this problem consider only the cases with one new server. When two or more new servers are to be set up, the problem with minmax cost criteria, MinMax, becomes NP-hard. In this work we identify some useful properties about the potential locations for the new servers, from which we derive a novel algorithm for MinMax, and show that it is efficient when the number of new servers is small. When the number of new servers is large, we propose an efficient 3-approximate algorithm. We verify with experiments on real road networks that our solutions are effective and attains significantly better result quality compared to the existing greedy algorithms