28 research outputs found

    {5,5′-Dimeth­oxy-2,2′-[1,1′-(2,2-dimethyl­propane-1,3-diyldinitrilo)­diethyl­idyne]diphenolato-κ4 O,N,N′,O′}copper(II) monohydrate

    Get PDF
    The tetra­dentate dianion in the title complex hydrate, [Cu(C23H28N2O4)]·H2O, provides the CuII atom with a cis-N2O2 donor set. There is a significant twist from a regular square-planar geometry with the dihedral angle formed between the two six-membered CuOC3N chelate rings being 32.14 (8)°. The water mol­ecule forms hydrogen bonds to each of the coordinating O atoms of a given complex mol­ecule. Supra­molecular layers in the bc plane are formed in the crystal packing through C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π inter­actions

    {4,4′-Dibromo-2,2′-[2,2-dimethyl­propane-1,3-diylbis(nitrilo­methanylyl­idene)]diphenolato-κ4 O,N,N′,O′}nickel(II)

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, [Ni(C19H18Br2N2O2)], the NiII ion, lying on a twofold rotation axis, is coordinated by two N atoms and two O atoms from the Schiff base ligand in a distorted square-planar geometry. Weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds stabilize the crystal structure

    2-{(1E)-1-[(3-{(E)-[1-(2-Hy­droxy-4-meth­oxy­phen­yl)ethyl­idene]amino}-2,2-di­methyl­prop­yl)imino]­eth­yl}-5-meth­oxy­phenol

    Get PDF
    Mol­ecules of the title compound, C23H30N2O4, are located on a crystallographic mirror plane. The mol­ecule has a curved shape with the dihedral angle formed between the two benzene rings being 55.26 (5)°. Intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds are noted. In the crystal, supra­molecular layers are formed in the ac plane owing to the presence of C—H⋯π inter­actions

    Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by cataract: a meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020

    Get PDF
    Background: To estimate global and regional trends from 2000 to 2020 of the number of persons visually impaired by cataract and their proportion of the total number of vision-impaired individuals. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published population studies and gray literature from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to estimate global and regional trends. We developed prevalence estimates based on modeled distance visual impairment and blindness due to cataract, producing location-, year-, age-, and sex-specific estimates of moderate to severe vision impairment (MSVI presenting visual acuity &lt;6/18, ≥3/60) and blindness (presenting visual acuity &lt;3/60). Estimates are age-standardized using the GBD standard population. Results: In 2020, among overall (all ages) 43.3 million blind and 295 million with MSVI, 17.0 million (39.6%) people were blind and 83.5 million (28.3%) had MSVI due to cataract blind 60% female, MSVI 59% female. From 1990 to 2020, the count of persons blind (MSVI) due to cataract increased by 29.7%(93.1%) whereas the age-standardized global prevalence of cataract-related blindness improved by −27.5% and MSVI increased by 7.2%. The contribution of cataract to the age-standardized prevalence of blindness exceeded the global figure only in South Asia (62.9%) and Southeast Asia and Oceania (47.9%). Conclusions: The number of people blind and with MSVI due to cataract has risen over the past 30 years, despite a decrease in the age-standardized prevalence of cataract. This indicates that cataract treatment programs have been beneficial, but population growth and aging have outpaced their impact. Growing numbers of cataract blind indicate that more, better-directed, resources are needed to increase global capacity for cataract surgery.</p

    Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by cataract : a meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020

    Get PDF
    DATA AVAILABILITY : Data sources for the Global Vision Database are listed at the following weblink http://www.anglia.ac.uk/verigbd. Fully disaggregated data is not available publicly due to data sharing agreements with some principal investigators yet requests for summary data can be made to the corresponding author.CHANGE HISTORY 16 July 2024 : A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03161-7.BACKGROUND : To estimate global and regional trends from 2000 to 2020 of the number of persons visually impaired by cataract and their proportion of the total number of vision-impaired individuals. METHODS : A systematic review and meta-analysis of published population studies and gray literature from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to estimate global and regional trends. We developed prevalence estimates based on modeled distance visual impairment and blindness due to cataract, producing location-, year-, age-, and sex-specific estimates of moderate to severe vision impairment (MSVI presenting visual acuity <6/18, ≥3/60) and blindness (presenting visual acuity <3/60). Estimates are age-standardized using the GBD standard population. RESULTS : In 2020, among overall (all ages) 43.3 million blind and 295 million with MSVI, 17.0 million (39.6%) people were blind and 83.5 million (28.3%) had MSVI due to cataract blind 60% female, MSVI 59% female. From 1990 to 2020, the count of persons blind (MSVI) due to cataract increased by 29.7%(93.1%) whereas the age-standardized global prevalence of cataract-related blindness improved by −27.5% and MSVI increased by 7.2%. The contribution of cataract to the age-standardized prevalence of blindness exceeded the global figure only in South Asia (62.9%) and Southeast Asia and Oceania (47.9%). CONCLUSIONS : The number of people blind and with MSVI due to cataract has risen over the past 30 years, despite a decrease in the age-standardized prevalence of cataract. This indicates that cataract treatment programs have been beneficial, but population growth and aging have outpaced their impact. Growing numbers of cataract blind indicate that more, better-directed, resources are needed to increase global capacity for cataract surgery.Brien Holden Vision Institute, Fondation Thea, Fred Hollows Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Lions Clubs International Foundation (LCIF), Sightsavers International, and University of Heidelberg. Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.https://www.nature.com/eyehj2024School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH)SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-bein
    corecore