64 research outputs found

    The Computation of Surface Lightness in Simple and Complex Scenes

    Get PDF
    The present thesis examined how reflectance properties and the complexity of surface mesostructure (small-scale surface relief) influence perceived lightness in centresurround displays. Chapters 2 and 3 evaluated the role of surface relief, gloss, and interreflections on lightness constancy, which was examined across changes in background albedo and illumination level. For surfaces with visible mesostructure (“rocky” surfaces), lightness constancy across changes in background albedo was better for targets embedded in glossy versus matte surfaces. However, this improved lightness constancy for gloss was not observed when illumination varied. Control experiments compared the matte and glossy rocky surrounds to two control displays, which matched either pixel histograms or a phase-scrambled power spectrum. Lightness constancy was improved for rocky glossy displays over the histogram-matched displays, but not compared to phase-scrambled variants of these images with equated power spectrums. The results were similar for surfaces rendered with 1, 2, 3 and 4 interreflections. These results suggest that lightness perception in complex centre-surround displays can be explained by the distribution of contrast across space and scale, independently of explicit information about surface shading or specularity. The results for surfaces without surface relief (“homogeneous” surfaces) differed qualitatively to rocky surfaces, exhibiting abrupt steps in perceived lightness at points at which the targets transitioned from being increments to decrements. Chapter 4 examined whether homogeneous displays evoke more complex mid-level representations similar to conditions of transparency. Matching target lightness in a homogeneous display to that in a textured or rocky display required varying both lightness and transmittance of the test patch on the textured display to obtain the most satisfactory matches. However, transmittance was only varied to match the contrast of targets against homogeneous surrounds, and not to explicitly match the amount of transparency perceived in the displays. The results suggest perceived target-surround edge contrast differs between homogeneous and textured displays. Varying the mid-level property of transparency in textured displays provides a natural means for equating both target lightness and the unique appearance of the edge contrast in homogeneous displays

    Should every child with epilepsy undergo screening for psychiatric comorbidities?

    Get PDF
    Purpose: We aimed to build a classification system that uses resting-state (no visible scalp epileptic activity) EEG-based directed functional connectivity values to assign a patient to one of three classes: left TLE (LTLE), right TLE (RTLE) or healthy control. Methods: Twenty LTLE, 20 RTLE and 35 healthy controls underwent resting-state high-density EEG. For each subject, sixty 1-sec epochs free of artifacts or interictal spikes were selected. The source activity was obtained for 82 regions of interest using an individual head model and distributed linear inverse solution. The summed outflow and whole-brain directed functional connectivity were estimated in the theta, alpha and beta frequency bands using Granger-causal modeling. A Random Forest classifier (an ensemble of decision tree classifiers) was then used to assign the subject to one of three classes. The mean classification accuracy was computed with a leave-one-out procedure. We selected a maximum of six connectivity values for classification, using a greedy forward selection algorithm. Finally, three classifiers were built: ‘Control vs. LTLE’, ‘Control vs. RTLE’ and ‘LTLE vs. RTLE’. In the final classification system, a new subject is assigned to the class that was most voted by these three classifiers. Results: The ‘Control vs. RTLE’ classifier achieved an accuracy of 78.2% (sensitivity: 80.0%, specificity 77.2%), ‘Control vs. LTLE’ an accuracy of 83.6% (sensitivity 85.0%, specificity 82.9%) and ‘LTLE vs. RTLE’ an accuracy of 85.0% (sensitivity 85.0%, specificity 85.0%). Combining these classifiers into one system yielded that 16, 15 and 27 subjects were correctly classified as being, respectively, RTLE, LTLE and control. Conclusion: The high accuracy achieved demonstrates the potential of resting-state EEG-based directed functional connectivity for the diagnosis and lateralization of TLE. This could constitute a new clinical biomarker for surgical candidates and earlier in the course of the disease

    CREBBP mutations in individuals without Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome phenotype

    Get PDF
    Item does not contain fulltextMutations in CREBBP cause Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. By using exome sequencing, and by using Sanger in one patient, CREBBP mutations were detected in 11 patients who did not, or only in a very limited manner, resemble Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. The combined facial signs typical for Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome were absent, none had broad thumbs, and three had only somewhat broad halluces. All had apparent developmental delay (being the reason for molecular analysis); five had short stature and seven had microcephaly. The facial characteristics were variable; main characteristics were short palpebral fissures, telecanthi, depressed nasal ridge, short nose, anteverted nares, short columella, and long philtrum. Six patients had autistic behavior, and two had self-injurious behavior. Other symptoms were recurrent upper airway infections (n = 5), feeding problems (n = 7) and impaired hearing (n = 7). Major malformations occurred infrequently. All patients had a de novo missense mutation in the last part of exon 30 or beginning of exon 31 of CREBBP, between base pairs 5,128 and 5,614 (codons 1,710 and 1,872). No missense or truncating mutations in this region have been described to be associated with the classical Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome phenotype. No functional studies have (yet) been performed, but we hypothesize that the mutations disturb protein-protein interactions by altering zinc finger function. We conclude that patients with missense mutations in this specific CREBBP region show a phenotype that differs substantially from that in patients with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, and may prove to constitute one (or more) separate entities. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

    Under-reported aspects of diagnosis and treatment addressed in the Dutch-Flemish guideline for comprehensive diagnostics in disorders/differences of sex development

    Get PDF
    We present key points from the updated Dutch-Flemish guideline on comprehensive diagnostics in disorders/differences of sex development (DSD) that have not been widely addressed in the current (inter)national literature. These points are of interest to physicians working in DSD (expert) centres and to professionals who come across persons with a DSD but have no (or limited) experience in this area. The Dutch-Flemish guideline is based on internationally accepted principles. Recent initiatives striving for uniform high-quality care across Europe, and beyond, such as the completed COST action 1303 and the European Reference Network for rare endocrine conditions (EndoERN), have generated several excellent papers covering nearly all aspects of DSD. The Dutch-Flemish guideline follows these international consensus papers and covers a number of other topics relevant to daily practice. For instance, although next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular diagnostics are becoming the gold standard for genetic evaluation, it can be difficult to prove variant causality or relate the genotype to the clinical presentation. Network formation and centralisation are essential to promote functional studies that assess the effects of genetic variants and to the correct histological assessment of gonadal material from DSD patients, as well as allowing for maximisation of expertise and possible cost reductions. The Dutch-Flemish guidelines uniquely address three aspects of DSD. First, we propose an algorithm for counselling and diagnostic evaluation when a DSD is suspected prenatally, a clinical situation that is becoming more common. Referral to ultrasound sonographers and obstetricians who are part of a DSD team is increasingly important here. Second, we pay special attention to healthcare professionals not working within a DSD centre as they are often the first to diagnose or suspect a DSD, but are not regularly exposed to DSDs and may have limited experience. Their thoughtful communication to patients, carers and colleagues, and the accessibility of protocols for first-line management and efficient referral are essential. Careful communication in the prenatal to neonatal period and the adolescent to adult transition are equally important and relatively under-reported in the literature. Third, we discuss the timing of (NGS-based) molecular diagnostics in the initial workup of new patients and in people with a diagnosis made solely on clinical grounds or those who had earlier genetic testing that is not compatible with current state-of-the-art diagnostics

    PRRT2-related phenotypes in patients with a 16p11.2 deletion

    Get PDF
    We studied the presence of benign infantile epilepsy (BIE), paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD), and PKD with infantile convulsions (PKD/IC) in patients with a 16p11.2 deletion including PRRT2 or with a PRRT2 loss-of-function sequence variant. Index patients were recruited from seven Dutch university hospitals. The presence of BIE, PKD and PKD/IC was retrospectively evaluated using questionnaires and medical records. We included 33 patients with a 16p11.2 deletion: three (9%) had BIE, none had PKD or PKD/IC. Twelve patients had a PRRT2 sequence variant: BIE was present in four (p = 0.069), PKD in six (p < 0.001) and PKD/IC in two (p = 0.067). Most patients with a deletion had undergone genetic testing because of developmental problems (87%), whereas all patients with a sequence variant were tested because of a movement disorder (55%) or epilepsy (45%). BIE, PKD and PKD/IC clearly showed incomplete penetrance in patients with 16p11.2 deletions, but were found in all and 95% of patients with a PRRT2 sequence variant in our study and a large literature cohort, respectively. Deletions and sequence variants have the same underlying loss-of-function disease mechanism. Thus, differences in ascertainment have led to overestimating the frequency of BIE, PKD and PKD/IC in patients with a PRRT2 sequence variant. This has important implications for counseling if genome-wide sequencing shows such variants in patients not presenting the PRRT2-related phenotypes

    [From gene to disease; achondroplasia and other skeletal dysplasias due to an activating mutation in the fibroblast growth factor]

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltextAchondroplasia, the most common and best known skeletal dysplasia, is inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. Like a number of other skeletal dysplasias, among which hypochondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia, achondroplasia is caused by mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene. FGFR3 is a negative regulator of bone growth. Binding of fibroblast growth factors to the FGFR3 receptor stimulates its tyrosine kinase activity in the cell. This activates a signal transduction pathway that regulates enchondral ossification by inhibition of cell division and stimulation of cell maturation and differentiation. Mutations in the FGFR3 gene give rise to activation of the receptor in the absence of growth factors, thus causing abnormal long bone development. Position and type of mutation in the FGFR3 gene determine the extent of overactivation and thus the severity of the skeletal abnormality

    [From gene to disease; achondroplasia and other skeletal dysplasias due to an activating mutation in the fibroblast growth factor]

    No full text
    Achondroplasia, the most common and best known skeletal dysplasia, is inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. Like a number of other skeletal dysplasias, among which hypochondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia, achondroplasia is caused by mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene. FGFR3 is a negative regulator of bone growth. Binding of fibroblast growth factors to the FGFR3 receptor stimulates its tyrosine kinase activity in the cell. This activates a signal transduction pathway that regulates enchondral ossification by inhibition of cell division and stimulation of cell maturation and differentiation. Mutations in the FGFR3 gene give rise to activation of the receptor in the absence of growth factors, thus causing abnormal long bone development. Position and type of mutation in the FGFR3 gene determine the extent of overactivation and thus the severity of the skeletal abnormality

    [Amyoplasia congenita: a serious congenital abnormality with a relatively favorable prognosis]

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltextAfter an uneventful pregnancy a girl was born with serious joint contractures and several fractures of the long bones. The family history was negative for congenital abnormalities. Based on the distinct clinical presentation the diagnosis was 'amyoplasia', which is a partial aplasia of skeletal muscles. The cause of amyoplasia is unknown. As well as the partial muscle aplasia, which is symmetrical and mainly affects the extremities, joint contractures and deep dimples in the skin around the joints are present. Several frequently associated abnormalities have been reported, including abdominal hernias, midface capillary haemangiomas and hypoplastic external genitalia. The condition is always sporadic; there is a striking discordance within monozygotic twins and the offspring of patients is normal. In contrast with the severe neonatal presentation, the clinical prognosis is relatively good owing to intensive multidisciplinary treatment and the normal intelligence of the patients
    corecore