Potential Risk Factors for, and Clinical Implications of, Delirium during Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Matched Case-Control Study

To investigate the association between a wide set of baseline characteristics (age, sex, rehabilitation discipline), functional scores [Functional Independence Measure (FIM), cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS)], diseases, and administered drugs and incident delirium in rehabilitation inpatients and, furthermore, to assess clinical implications of developing delirium during rehabilitation.; Matched case-control study based on electronic health record data.; We studied rehabilitation stays of inpatients admitted between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, to ZURZACH Care, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, an inpatient rehabilitation clinic in Switzerland.; We conducted unconditional logistic regression analyses to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CIs of exposures that were recorded in ≥5 cases and controls.; Among a total of 10,503 rehabilitation stays, we identified 125 validated cases. Older age, undergoing neurologic rehabilitation, a low FIM, and a high CIRS were associated with an increased risk of incident delirium. Being diagnosed with a bacterial infection (AOR 2.62, 95% CI 1.06-6.49), a disorder of fluid, electrolyte, or acid-base balance (AOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.19-6.38), Parkinson's disease (AOR 5.68, 95% CI 2.54-12.68), and administration of antipsychotic drugs (AOR 8.06, 95% CI 4.26-15.22), antiparkinson drugs (AOR 2.86, 95% CI 1.42-5.77), drugs for constipation (AOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.25-3.58), heparins (AOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.29-3.24), or antidepressant drugs (AOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.14-3.10) during rehabilitation, or an increased anticholinergic burden (ACB ≥ 3) (AOR 2.59, 95% CI 1.41-4.73) were also associated with an increased risk of incident delirium.; We identified a set of factors associated with an increased risk of incident delirium during inpatient rehabilitation. Our findings contribute to detect patients at risk of delirium during inpatient rehabilitation

Detecting Incident Delirium within Routinely Collected Inpatient Rehabilitation Data: Validation of a Chart-Based Method

Delirium is a brain condition associated with poor outcomes in rehabilitation. It is therefore important to assess delirium incidence in rehabilitation.; To develop and validate a chart-based method to identify incident delirium episodes within the electronic database of a Swiss rehabilitation clinic, and to identify a study population of validated incident delirium episodes for further research purposes.; Retrospective validation study.; Routinely collected inpatient clinical data from ZURZACH Care.; All patients undergoing rehabilitation at ZURZACH Care, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach between 2015 and 2018 were included.; Within the study population, we identified all rehabilitation stays for which ≥2 delirium-predictive key words (common terms used to describe delirious patients) were recorded in the medical charts. We excluded all prevalent delirium episodes and defined the remaining episodes to be potentially incident. At least two physicians independently confirmed or refuted each potential incident delirium episode by reviewing the patient charts. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for all potential incident delirium episodes and for specific subgroups.; Within 10,515 rehabilitation stays we identified 554 potential incident delirium episodes. Overall, 125 potential incident delirium episodes were confirmed by expert review. The PPV of the chart-based method varied from 0.23 (95% CI 0.19-0.26) overall to 0.69 (95% CI 0.56-0.79) in specific subgroups.; Our chart-based method was able to capture incident delirium episodes with low to moderate accuracy. By conducting an additional expert review of the medical charts, we identified a study population of validated incident delirium episodes. Our chart-based method contributes towards an automated detection of potential incident delirium episodes that, supplemented with expert review, efficiently yields a validated population of incident delirium episodes for research purposes

Utilization pattern of hormone therapy in UK general practice between 1996 and 2015: a descriptive study

To describe the long-term trends in hormone therapy (HT) use in UK general practice after evidence of associated increased risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and breast cancer, subsequent guideline changes in 2003/2004 advising individualized HT prescribing, and halving of HT use between 2002 and 2005.; We conducted a descriptive study to quantify annual proportions of overall and new HT use in women aged 40 to 79 years, using the UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1996-2015). We further described HT utilization patterns (drug type, administration route, dose) within 2-year blocks overall and within subpopulations with pre-existing CVD or breast cancer.; Overall HT use continued to decline from 9.4% in 2006 to 7.5% in 2015. Between 1998 and 2001, the proportion of HT initiation was around 1.7%, which halved by 2005 (0.8%), and increased again up until 2015 (1.0%). The mean age of HT users increased from 54.7 in 1996/1997 to 56.6 in 2002/2003, and leveled off at 57 to 58 years in 2014/2015. The prevalence of CVD in HT users decreased from a peak of 5.8% in 2002/2003 to 4.5% in 2014/2015, whereas breast cancer prevalence continuously increased from 0.9% in 1996/1997 to 1.9% in 2014/2015. Overall, we observed trends towards use of estrogen therapy, vaginal HT, and lower HT dose after 2002/2003, which were stronger among subpopulations with pre-existing CVD or breast cancer.; Our study suggests that the HT guideline changes implemented in UK clinical practice resulted in safer HT use, particularly in women with pre-existing CVD or breast cancer

Risk of hand osteoarthritis in new users of hormone replacement therapy: A nested case-control analysis

To estimate the risk of hand osteoarthritis (HOA) associated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT).; We conducted a nested case-control study using data from the UKbased Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1998-2017). In the study inception cohort comprised women at age 45. We matched women with incident HOA during follow-up (cases) to osteoarthritisfree controls on age and calendar date (index date, ID), in a ratio of 1:4. We applied conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of HOA associated with new HRT use compared with non-use overall, and for women with recorded menopause we calculated separate ORs according to the time between menopause and HRT initiation (current users), and the time between HRT cessation and the ID (past users), versus non-users.; There were 3440 cases and 13,760 controls (mean age: 50.9 ± 4.1 years). We observed an adjusted OR (aOR) of HOA of 1.32 (95 % CI 1.17-1.48) in HRT users (versus nonusers), which attenuated to 0.98 (95 % CI 0.85-1.14) in women with recorded menopause. Current users (versus nonusers) who initiated HRT 3 months before or after menopause had an aOR of 0.72 (95 % CI 0.55-0.96), while aORs increased with later HRT initiation. Among past users (versus non-users), we observed an aOR of 1.25 (95 % CI 0.86-1.81) when HRT use was stopped ≤18 months before the ID, approaching the null with increasing duration between HRT cessation and the ID.; Current HRT use was associated with a decreased risk of HOA if initiated around menopause, but the risk reduction disappeared after HRT cessation

A review of the evidence on the risk of congenital malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders in association with antiseizure medications during pregnancy

Introduction: The majority of women with epilepsy require treatment with antiseizure medications (ASM) throughout pregnancy. However, in utero exposure to several ASM has been associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations and/or neurodevelopmental disorders (CM/NDD) in the child, but observational evidence is methodologically heterogeneous. Areas covered: We critically evaluate current evidence on the risk of CM/NDD in children of women with epilepsy after in utero exposure to different ASM. We highlight characteristics of different data sources and discuss their benefits and drawbacks. This review includes evidence published before December 2020. Expert opinion: Given the lack of randomized controlled trials, evidence on in utero safety of ASM originates from methodologically heterogeneous post-marketing observational studies based on regis tries, prospective cohorts, and large electronic health databases. It has been clearly demonstrated that valproate is associated with a high risk of CM/NDD, whereas lamotrigine and levetiracetam are relatively safe. However, evidence is less explicit for other ASM. Reported risks vary depending on the size and origin of the underlying study population, the definition of exposure and outcomes, and other aspects of the study design. Increased collaboration between data sources to increase sample size is desirable