In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank

Objective  This article characterizes the resources used by ophthalmology residency applicants when deciding where to apply, interview, and rank. Design  Cross-sectional, online survey. Participants  All applicants to the University of California-San Francisco ophthalmology residency program during the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 application cycles. Methods  A secure, anonymous, 19-item post-match questionnaire was distributed to participants inquiring about demographic information, match outcomes, and resources used to learn and make decisions about residency programs. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Main Outcome Measures  Qualitative ranking of resources used to decide where to apply, interview, and rank. Results  One hundred thirty-six of 870 solicited applicants responded to the questionnaire, for a response rate of 15.6%. Digital platforms were ranked as more important resources than people (i.e., faculty, career advisors, residents, and program directors) when applicants were deciding where to apply and interview. Digital platforms became far less important when applicants were formulating their rank lists, at which time the program's academic reputation, perceived happiness of residents and faculty, interview experience, and geographic location were more important. When learning about residency programs, 100% of respondents engaged with program Web sites, and the majority engaged with program emails ( n =88 [85.4%]), Doximity ( n =82 [79.6%]), Reddit ( n =64 [62.1%]), Instagram ( n =59 [57.3%]), the FREIDA residency program database ( n =55 [53.4%]), and YouTube ( n =53 [51.5%]). All 13 digital platforms included in the survey were utilized by at least 25% of respondents, largely passively (i.e., reading rather than producing content). Respondents indicated that the most important topics to include on program Web sites were the number of residents accepted per year, current resident profiles, and resident alumni job/fellowship placement. Conclusion  Applicants engage heavily with digital media in deciding where to apply and interview but rely heavily on their personal experiences with the program in deciding where to rank. Ophthalmology programs may facilitate recruitment of applicants by optimizing their digital media platforms

Health Disparity Curricula for Ophthalmology Residents: Current Landscape, Barriers, and Needs.

Background  Social determinants of health play a critical role in visual health outcomes. Yet, there exists no structured curriculum for ophthalmology residents to identify and address health disparities relevant to eye care or no a standard assessment of health disparities education within ophthalmology residency programs. This study aims to characterize current health disparity curricula in ophthalmology residency programs in the United States, determine resident confidence in addressing health disparities in the clinical setting, and identify perceived barriers and needs of program directors (PDs) and residents in this area. Design  This was a cross-sectional survey study. Methods  A closed-ended questionnaire with comments was distributed to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited ophthalmology residency PDs and residents in April 2021 and May 2022. The questionnaire solicited characteristics of any existing health disparity curricula, PD and resident perceptions of these curricula, and residents experience with and confidence in addressing health disparities in the delivery of patient care. Results  In total, 29 PDs and 96 residents responded. Sixty-six percent of PDs stated their program had a formal curriculum compared to fifty-three percent of residents. Forty-one percent of PDs and forty-one percent of residents stated their program places residents in underserved care settings for more than 50% of their training. Most residents (72%) were confident in recognizing health disparities. Sixty-six percent were confident in managing care in the face of disparities and fifty-nine percent felt they know how to utilize available resources. Residents were most concerned with the lack of access to resources to help patients. Forty-five percent of PDs felt the amount of time dedicated to health disparities education was adequate. Forty-nine percent of residents reported they felt the amount of training they received on health disparities to be adequate. The top barrier to curriculum development identified by PDs was the availability of trained faculty to teach. Time in the curriculum was a major barrier identified by residents. Conclusions  Roughly half of ophthalmology residency programs who responded had a health disparity curriculum; however, both PDs and residents felt inadequate time is dedicated to such education. National guidance on structured health disparity curricula for ophthalmology residents may be warranted as a next step

Factors impacting cumulative dissipated energy levels and postoperative visual acuity outcome in cataract surgery

PurposeTo determine factors impacting cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in phacoemulsification.DesignReview of 1102 cases at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (ZOC), China.SubjectsPatients who underwent cataract surgery at UCSF 03/2014-03/2019 and at ZOC 10/2018-05/2019.MethodsPatient demographics, medical history, routine ocular examination, and surgical information, including disassembly method, complications, and surgeon training level were recorded. Univariable and multivariable regression models were used to determine factors associated with CDE and good postoperative BCVA (20/40 or better) at 1 month.Outcome measuresCDE, postoperative BCVA.ResultsIn multivariable analysis, patient age at time of surgery, diabetes, degree of nuclear sclerosis (NS), white-to-white corneal diameter, disassembly method, preoperative BCVA, surgeon training level, and surgical center were significantly associated with CDE. Log10CDE increased by 0.20-0.31 for patient age ≥ 70 years, by 0.07 if the patient had diabetes, by 0.12-0.41 for NS grade ≥ 2, by 0.48 per 10 mm increase in white-to-white corneal diameter, by 0.34-0.47 for disassembly method other than non-stop chop, by 0.16 per unit increase in preoperative logMAR BCVA, and by > 0.09 when phacoemulsification was performed by residents early in their training. Log10CDE was 0.33 higher at UCSF than ZOC. In multivariable analysis, worse baseline visual acuity and age above 90 years at time of surgery decreased the odds of good BCVA (OR = 0.26 per unit increase in preoperative logMAR BCVA; OR = 0.12 for age > 90); comorbid retinal issues decreased the odds of good postoperative BCVA (OR = 0.13-0.39); greater anterior chamber depth (ACD) or shorter axial length (AL), increased the odds of good postoperative outcome (OR = 2.64 per 1 mm increase ACD, OR = 0.84 per 1 mm increase AL).ConclusionsCataract grade determined by slit lamp exam and, for the first time, older patient age, were noted to be important predictors of high CDE. CDE was not a risk factor for postoperative BCVA measured at postoperative 1 month. When surgery was performed by trainees under supervision, lower training level was associated with higher CDE, but not with worse postoperative BCVA

Factors Influencing Postgraduate Career Decisions of Ophthalmology Residents

AbstractObjective This study aims to identify factors that influence ophthalmology residents' decision to pursue fellowship training or to practice comprehensive ophthalmology after residency.Design This is a cross-sectional study.Methods An anonymous survey was sent to ophthalmology residents in the United States from the graduating class of 2018. The main outcome measure was the decision to seek fellowship training or to practice comprehensive ophthalmology. Information on demographics, residency program characteristics, and factors influencing career choices were collected.Results The overall response rate was 24.0% (112/467). Among the 112 respondents, 88 (78.6%) matched into subspecialty training. Compared with residents entering comprehensive ophthalmology, there was a greater proportion of Asians (37.5 vs. 8.3%) and a smaller proportion of non-Hispanic whites (47.7 vs. 70.8%,p = 0.029) among residents pursuing fellowship training. Residents pursuing fellowships had fewer children (0.4 vs. 0.8,p = 0.049), had less debt (median debt ≤ $100,000 vs. >$200,000,p = 0.008), had more first-author publications (4.3 vs. 1.2,p< 0.001), decided on their postgraduate career path earlier (median time postgraduate second year [PGY2] versus postgraduate third year [PGY3],p = 0.016), and were more likely to plan to practice in an academic setting (51.1 vs. 29.2%,p< 0.001) and in an urban location (44.3 vs. 12.5%,p = 0.004). In a multiple logistic regression model, factors predictive of fellowship training included a desire to acquire special skills (odds ratio [OR] =4.39; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.70–16.37) and work with new technology (OR = 2.92; 95% CI: 1.16–10.02). Factors that predicted a career in comprehensive ophthalmology were higher levels of educational debt (OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.12–0.77), a later timing of postgraduate decision (OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.02–0.65), and lifestyle considerations (OR = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.03–0.36). Gender, prestige, or perceived favorable job market was not significant factors.Conclusion The majority of U.S. ophthalmology residents matched into fellowships. A desire to gain special skills and a desire to work with new technology were major factors influencing residents to seek fellowship training. Lifestyle considerations and educational debt were more important in the decision to choose a comprehensive ophthalmology career. Future research that includes more trainees and programs may minimize the selection bias issues present in this study

Remote corneal suturing wet lab: microsurgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PurposeTo study the feasibility and efficacy of a new remote wet lab for microsurgical education using a corneal suturing task.SettingDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.DesignProspective randomized controlled study.MethodsTen ophthalmology residents were stratified by postgraduate year and randomized to perform a corneal suturing task consisting of placing the 4 cardinal sutures for a penetrating keratoplasty in porcine eyes with or without remote ophthalmology attending feedback. Subsequently, both groups repeated the same task without remote feedback to test whether initial remote feedback affected subsequent performance. Finally, the group without feedback was crossed over to repeat the same corneal suturing task with remote feedback. The effectiveness of the remote wet lab was assessed subjectively by survey and objectively by grading each suture pass.ResultsResident-reported comfort with corneal suturing improved significantly after the remote wet lab for all residents. Residents and attendings rated the remote wet lab as equally or more effective compared with previous in-person wet labs and overall effective in corneal suturing. Attendings rated the remote wet lab as effective in multiple domains of microsurgical education using a modified microsurgical global rating scale. Objective corneal suturing performance was similar for both groups.ConclusionsThe remote wet lab was feasible and effective for training ophthalmology residents in corneal suturing. This represents a new social distancing compliant platform for microsurgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic

Individuals with and without normal tension glaucoma exhibit comparable performance on tests of cognitive function

AimTo evaluate aspects of cognition impacted by individuals with and without normal tension glaucoma.MethodsFifty normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and 50 control patients ≥50y of age were recruited from the UCSF Department of Ophthalmology. Demographic data and glaucoma parameters were extracted from electronic medical records for both groups. Tests of executive function [Executive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research (EXAMINER)] and learning and memory [California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II)] were administered to both NTG and controls. Race, handedness, best-corrected visual acuity, maximum intraocular pressure, optic nerve cup-to-disc ratio, visual field and optic nerve optical coherence tomography parameters, and a measure of general health (Charlson Comorbidity Index) were compared between NTG and controls as well as within NTG subgroups. Multivariate linear regression was used to compare group performances on the EXAMINER battery and CVLT-II while controlling for age, sex, and years of education.ResultsNTG and controls were comparable with respect to age, sex, race, education, handedness, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (P&gt;0.05 for all). Performance on the EXAMINER composite score and the CVLT-II did not differ between NTG and controls (P&gt;0.05 for both).ConclusionThis is the first prospective study in which the cognitive function of subject with NTG were evaluated using a comprehensive, computerized neurocognitive battery. Subjects with NTG do not perform worse than unaffected controls on tests of executive function, learning, and memory. Results do not support the hypothesis that individuals with NTG are at higher risk for cognitive dysfunction and/or dementia

Association Between Parental Leave and Ophthalmology Resident Physician Performance

Importance Although parental leave is essential in enhancing resident wellness and fostering inclusive workplace environments, residents may often feel discouraged from using parental leave owing to perceived stigma and concerns about possible negative effects on their training. Objective To examine parental leave usage across multiple institutions and compare residency performance metrics between residents who took parental leave vs their peers who did not take leave. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis conducted from April 1, 2020, to July 28, 2022, of educational records. Multicenter data were obtained from 10 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)–accredited ophthalmology programs across the US. Included ophthalmology residents graduated between 2015 and 2019. Data were analyzed from August 15, 2021, to July 25, 2022. Exposures Performance metrics of residents who used parental leave during residency were compared with those of residents who did not take parental leave. Main Outcomes and Measures Measures of performance included the Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) scores, ACGME milestones scores, board examination pass rates, research activity, and surgical volumes. Results Of the 283 ophthalmology residents (149 male [52.7%]) included in the study, 44 (15.5%) took a median (IQR) parental leave of 4.5 (2-6) weeks. There were no differences in average OKAP percentiles, research activity, average ACGME milestones scores, or surgical volume between residents who took parental leave and those who did not. Residents who pursued fellowship were less likely to have taken parental leave (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.68; P < .001), and residents who practiced in private settings after residency were more likely to have taken parental leave (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.79-7.08; P < .001). When stratified by sex, no differences were identified in performance between female residents who took parental leave compared with residents who did not take leave, except a mild surgical number difference in 1 subspecialty category of keratorefractive procedures (difference in median values, −2; 95% CI, −3.7 to −0.3; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter cross-sectional study, no differences in performance metrics were identified between residents taking parental leave compared with their peers. These findings may provide reassurance to trainees and program directors regarding the unlikelihood, on average, that taking adequate parental leave will affect performance metrics adversely