417 research outputs found

    Triggers of Anaphylaxis in Mastocytosis Patients: Evidence of the Current Drug-Avoidance Recommendation

    Get PDF
    Mastocytosis is associated with a high risk of anaphylaxis, in part due to drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR). Drugs associated with mast cell activation include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), drugs used in the perioperative setting, including general anesthetics, neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) and opiates/opioids, radiocontrast media (RCM), vaccines, and antibiotics such as quinolones and vancomycin. To protect patients against DHR and anaphylaxis, general avoidance of potential drug triggers is common practice, which often deprives patients of important drugs at times of need and limits their options. We aimed to critically review current evidence on the indications to avoid drugs in children and adults with mastocytosis. Recent data shows that general avoidance of drugs with potential mast cell activation action is not indicated in all patients with mastocytosis, but guidelines are lacking. Drugs tolerated before and after the onset of mastocytosis should not be avoided and a personalized approach is recommended to address drugs inducing mast cell activation. Pre-medication (RCM, local and general anesthetics, vaccines), use of safer alternatives (opioids, NBMAs, NSAIDs in selected cases), and drug challenges (NSAIDs in most cases) are recommended to increase the safety of patients with mastocytosis when introduced to new drugs.Open access funding provided by FCT|FCCN (b-on)

    mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is well tolerated in patients with cutaneous and systemic mastocytosis with mast cell activation symptoms and anaphylaxis

    Get PDF
    Mastocytosis encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by the presence of clonal mast cells (MCs) in tissues and symptoms of MC activation, including anaphylaxis.1 Vaccination has been shown to cause exacerbation of MC mediator-related symptoms.2 Vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are the solution to the current pandemic, but reports of anaphylaxis following vaccination with the BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine have emerged.3 As such, it is important to provide evidence of the safety of mRNA vaccines in populations at risk for anaphylaxis, including patients with mastocytosis and MC activation symptoms

    Hypersensitivity to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine caused by tromethamine: PEG is not always the culprit excipient

    Get PDF
    Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are considered the cornerstone of the solution to the current global pandemic. The first vaccines to receive authorization for emergency use in humans were the BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech and the mRNA-1273 Moderna vaccines. Both contain synthetic mRNA that codes for the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein, which is encased in a lipid nanoparticle envelope. Anaphylaxis and immediate hypersensitivity reactions were noted in only 1 case during phase III trials for BNT162b2, while no immediate hypersensitivity reactions were noted for the mRNA-1273 vaccine. However, a history of hypersensitivity to any component of the vaccines was an exclusion criterion. Nonetheless, cases of anaphylaxis were reported shortly after initiation of the vaccination campaign

    Defining hereditary alpha-tryptasemia as a risk/modifying factor for anaphylaxis: are we there yet?

    Get PDF
    Hereditary a-tryptasemia (HaT) is a common autosomal dominant genet-ic trait with variable penetrance associated with increased serum baseline tryptase (SBT) levels. Clinical manifestations may range from an absence of symptoms to overtly severe and recurrent anaphylaxis. Symptoms have been claimed to result from excessive activation of EGF-like module -con-taining mucin-like hormone receptor-like 2 (EMR2) and protease activat-ed receptor 2 (PAR-2) receptors by a/13-tryptase heterotetramers. Herein, we aimed to review the evidence on whether HaT can be considered a hereditary risk factor or a modifying factor for anaphylaxis. Increased SBT levels have been linked to an increased risk of anaphylaxis. Likewise, recent studies have shown that HaT might be associated with a higher risk of developing anaphylaxis and more severe anaphylaxis. The same has also been shown for patients with clonal mast cell disorders, in whom the co-existence of HaT might lead to a greater propensity for se-vere, potentially life-threatening anaphylaxis. However, studies leading to such conclusions are generally limited in sample size, while other studies have shown opposing results. As such, further studies investigating the po-tential association of HaT with anaphylaxis caused by different triggers, and different severity grades, in both patients with clonal mast cell activa-tion syndromes and the general population are still needed

    COVID-19 Vaccination Is Safe among Mast Cell Disorder Patients, under Adequate Premedication

    Get PDF
    Reported cases of anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination raised concerns about the safety of these vaccines, namely in patients suffering from clonal mast cell (MC) disorders—a het-erogenous group of disorders in which patients may be prone to anaphylaxis caused by vaccination. This study aimed to assess the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with clonal MC disorders. We performed an ambidirectional cohort study with 30 clonal MC disorder patients (n = 26 in the prospective arm and n = 4 in the retrospective arm), that were submitted to COVID-19 vaccination. Among these, 11 (37%) were males, and median age at vaccination date was 41 years (range: 5 y to 76 y). One patient had prior history of anaphylaxis following vaccination. Those in the prospective arm received a premedication protocol including H1-and H2-antihistamines and montelukast, while those in the retrospective arm did not premedicate. Overall, patients received a total of 81 doses, 73 under premedication and 8 without premedication. No MC activation symptoms were reported. COVID-19 vaccination seems to be safe in patients with clonal mast cell disorders, including those with prior anaphylaxis following vaccination. Robust premedication protocols may allow for vaccination in ambulatory settings. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.This research received no external funding. Article processing charges were paid by the IAPorto Research Center

    Mastocytosis presenting with mast cell-mediator release-associated symptoms elicited by cyclo oxygenase inhibitors: prevalence, clinical, and laboratory features

    Get PDF
    Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently avoided in mastocytosis, because of a potential increased risk for drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) due to inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase (COX), subsequent depletion of prostaglandin E2 and release of leukotrienes. Objectives: Here, we aimed at determining the prevalence of mast cell (MC) mediator release symptoms triggered by NSAIDs in mastocytosis patients and the associated clinical and laboratory features of the disease. Methods: Medical records from 418 adults to 223 pediatric mastocytosis patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified according to tolerance patterns to NSAIDs and other COX inhibitors (COXi) and compared for epidemiological, clinical and laboratory findings. Results: Overall, 87% of adults and 91% of pediatric patients tolerated NSAIDs and other COXi. Among adult and pediatric patients presenting DHRs, 5% and 0% reacted to multiple NSAIDs, 4% and 0.7% were single reactors, and 3% and 8% were single reactors with known tolerance to paracetamol but unknown tolerance to other COXi, respectively. Among adults, hypersensitivity to ≥2 drugs was more frequent among females (p = 0.009), patients with prior history of anaphylaxis to triggers other than NSAIDs or other COXi and Hymenoptera venom (p = 0.009), presence of baseline flushing (p = 0.02), baseline serum tryptase ≥48 ng/ml (p = 0.005) and multilineage KIT mutation (p = 0.02). In contrast, tolerance to NSAIDs and other COXi was more frequent among males (p = 0.02), in patients with anaphylaxis caused by Hymenoptera venom (p = 0.02), among individuals who had skin lesions due to mastocytosis (p = 0.01), and in cases that had no baseline pruritus (p = 0.006). Based on these parameters, a score model was designed to stratify mastocytosis patients who have never received NSAIDs or other COXi apart from paracetamol, according to their risk of DHR. Conclusions: Our results suggest that despite the frequency of MC mediator related symptoms elicited by NSAIDs and other COXi apart from paracetamol is increased among mastocytosis patients versus the general population, it is lower than previously estimated and associated with unique disease features. Patients that tolerated NSAIDs and other COXi following disease onset should keep using them. In turn, adults with unknown tolerance to such drugs and a positive score should be challenged with a preferential/selective COX-2 inhibitor, while the remaining may be challenged with ibuprofen. © 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.Funding text 1: This work was supported by grants from the Carlos III Health Institute co‐financed by the European Regional Development Fund (PI19/01166) and CIBERONC CB16/12/00400, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Madrid, Spain), Asociación Española de Mastocitosis y Enfermedades Relacionadas (AEDM 2019), Fondos de Investigación para Enfermedades Raras del Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad (Madrid, Spain). ; Funding text 2: This work was supported by grants from the Carlos III Health Institute co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (PI19/01166) and CIBERONC CB16/12/00400, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Madrid, Spain), Asociación Española de Mastocitosis y Enfermedades Relacionadas (AEDM 2019), Fondos de Investigación para Enfermedades Raras del Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad (Madrid, Spain)

    Bone and Cytokine Markers Associated With Bone Disease in Systemic Mastocytosis

    Get PDF
    Background Mastocytosis encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by tissue accumulation of clonal mast cells, which frequently includes bone involvement. Several cytokines have been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of bone mass loss in systemic mastocytosis (SM), but their role in SM-associated osteosclerosis remains unknown. Objective To investigate the potential association between cytokine and bone remodeling markers with bone disease in SM, aiming at identifying biomarker profiles associated with bone loss and/or osteosclerosis. Methods A total of 120 adult patients with SM, divided into 3 age and sex-matched groups according to their bone status were studied: (1) healthy bone (n = 46), (2) significant bone loss (n = 47), and (3) diffuse bone sclerosis (n = 27). Plasma levels of cytokines and serum baseline tryptase and bone turnover marker levels were measured at diagnosis. Results Bone loss was associated with significantly higher levels of serum baseline tryptase (P = .01), IFN-γ (P = .05), IL-1β (P = .05), and IL-6 (P = .05) versus those found in patients with healthy bone. In contrast, patients with diffuse bone sclerosis showed significantly higher levels of serum baseline tryptase (P < .001), C-terminal telopeptide (P < .001), amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P < .001), osteocalcin (P < .001), bone alkaline phosphatase (P < .001), osteopontin (P < .01), and the C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 5/RANTES chemokine (P = .01), together with lower IFN-γ (P = .03) and RANK-ligand (P = .04) plasma levels versus healthy bone cases. Conclusions SM with bone mass loss is associated with a proinflammatory cytokine profile in plasma, whereas diffuse bone sclerosis shows increased serum/plasma levels of biomarkers related to bone formation and turnover, in association with an immunosuppressive cytokine secretion profile.This study was supported by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII, Spain) (PI19/01166, CIBERONC: CB16/12/00400) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) (EQC2019-005419-P), within the Subprograma Estatal de Infraestructuras de Investigación y Equipamiento Científico Técnico de 2019 del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Fundación Española de Mastocitosis (FEM, Madrid, Spain ref.: FEM2019-MAGPIX and FEM2021-SAM); Asociación Española de Mastocitosis y Enfermedades Relacionadas (AEDM-CTMC-2019). We also thank the Biobank at the Hospital Virgen de la Salud (BioB-HVS) No. B.0000520, Toledo, Spain. TAR was supported by the 2019 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Fellowship award. We thank our patients for their willingness to participate in this study

    Experimental manipulation of radiographic density in mouse mammary gland

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Extensive mammographic density in women is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. Mouse models provide a powerful approach to the study of human diseases, but there is currently no model that is suited to the study of mammographic density. METHODS: We performed individual manipulations of the stromal, epithelial and matrix components of the mouse mammary gland and examined the alterations using in vivo and ex vivo radiology, whole mount staining and histology. RESULTS: Areas of density were generated that resembled densities in mammographic images of the human breast, and the nature of the imposed changes was confirmed at the cellular level. Furthermore, two genetic models, one deficient in epithelial structure (Pten conditional tissue specific knockout) and one with hyperplastic epithelium and mammary tumors (MMTV-PyMT), were used to examine radiographic density. CONCLUSION: Our data show the feasibility of altering and imaging mouse mammary gland radiographic density by experimental and genetic means, providing the first step toward modelling the biological processes that are responsible for mammographic density in the mouse

    Measurement of the branching fraction and CP content for the decay B(0) -> D(*+)D(*-)

    Get PDF
    This is the pre-print version of the Article. The official published version can be accessed from the links below. Copyright @ 2002 APS.We report a measurement of the branching fraction of the decay B0→D*+D*- and of the CP-odd component of its final state using the BABAR detector. With data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20.4  fb-1 collected at the Υ(4S) resonance during 1999–2000, we have reconstructed 38 candidate signal events in the mode B0→D*+D*- with an estimated background of 6.2±0.5 events. From these events, we determine the branching fraction to be B(B0→D*+D*-)=[8.3±1.6(stat)±1.2(syst)]×10-4. The measured CP-odd fraction of the final state is 0.22±0.18(stat)±0.03(syst).This work is supported by DOE and NSF (USA), NSERC (Canada), IHEP (China), CEA and CNRS-IN2P3 (France), BMBF (Germany), INFN (Italy), NFR (Norway), MIST (Russia), and PPARC (United Kingdom). Individuals have received support from the A.P. Sloan Foundation, Research Corporation, and Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
    corecore