Sobre Benedetti, Raimo. Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema

Review of Raimo Benedetti's book, Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema. São Paulo: SESI-SP Editora, 2018, 256 pp., ISBN 978-85-504-0548-3Keywords: review, Raimo Benedetti, precinema, Eadweard Muybridge, Étienne-Jules Marey ___________ Sobre Benedetti, Raimo. Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema. Resumen: Reseña del libro de Raimo Benedetti. Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema. São Paulo: SESI-SP Editora, 2018, 256 pp., ISBN 978-85-504-0548-3Palabras clave: reseña, Raimo Benedetti, pre-cine, Eadweard Muybridge, Étienne-Jules Marey,___________ Sobre Benedetti, Raimo. Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema. Resumo: Resehna do livro de Raimo Benedetti, Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema. São Paulo: SESI-SP Editora, 2018, 256 pp., ISBN 978-85-504-0548-3Palavras chave: resehna, Raimo Benedetti, pré-cinema, Eadweard Muybridge, Étienne-Jules Marey_____________ Date of reception: 6th November 2018Date of acceptance:  27th November 2018Reseña del libro de Raimo Benedetti. Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema. São Paulo: SESI-SP Editora, 2018, 256 pp., ISBN 978-85-504-0548-3Palabras clave: reseña, Raimo Benedetti, pre-cine, Eadweard Muybridge, Étienne-Jules Marey,___________ About Souza, Benedetti, Raimo. Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema. Abstract: Review of Raimo Benedetti's book, Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema. São Paulo: SESI-SP Editora, 2018, 256 pp., ISBN 978-85-504-0548-3Keywords: review, Raimo Benedetti, precinema, Eadweard Muybridge, Étienne-Jules Marey ___________ Sobre Benedetti, Raimo. Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema Resumo: Resehna do livro de Raimo Benedetti, Entre pássaros e cavalos. Marey, Muybridge e o pré-cinema. São Paulo: SESI-SP Editora, 2018, 256 pp., ISBN 978-85-504-0548-3Palavras chave: resehna, Raimo Benedetti, pré-cinema, Eadweard Muybridge, Étienne-Jules Marey_____________ Fecha de recepción: 6 de noviembre de 2018Fecha de aceptación: 27 de noviembre de 201

Group Knowledge

There is knowledge in groups or communities, e.g. in the\ud scientific community, that such and such is the case, and\ud that in some cases groups as groups know; and in all\ud these cases there must be or have been actual knowers.\ud Accordingly, there is knowledge available in social groups,\ud and this knowledge can be "picked up� and had by\ud individual members as knowledge. My main concern in this\ud paper is to give an account of group beliefs and knowledge\ud in the sense that the group members as a group believe or\ud know something. A central case here is normatively\ud binding group belief and knowledge. In such a case the\ud group is obligated to reason and act on the truth of the\ud content of the belief in question. I will assume that a group\ud cannot know unless its members or at least some of them\ud know the item in question. The general ground for this\ud assumption is that group properties supervene on their\ud members' relevant properties (see Tuomela 1995 Chapter\ud 6, for a discussion). A group's normatively binding belief\ud concerning a topic will accordingly depend on its members,\ud beliefs, indeed we-mode "acceptance� beliefs, about the\ud topic and on their relevant "interconnections" concerning it.\ud We-mode acceptance belief centrally involves the idea of\ud functioning fully as a group member (see Tuomela 2002a,\ud 2003a for the we-mode). A member"s private or I-mode\ud beliefs may differ from his relevant we-mode beliefs

Speaking Your Mind: Expression in Locke's Theory of Language

There is a tension between John Locke’s awareness of the fundamental importance of a shared public language and the manner in which his theorizing appears limited to offering a psychologistic account of the idiolects of individual speakers. I argue that a correct understanding of Locke’s central notion of signification can resolve this tension. I start by examining a long standing objection to Locke’s view, according to which his theory of meaning systematically gets the subject matter of our discourse wrong, by making our ideas the meanings of our words. By examining Locke’s definition of “truth”, I show that Lockean signification is an expression relation, rather than a descriptive or referential relation. Consequently, the sense in which our words signify our ideas is roughly that our utterances advertise our otherwise undisclosed mental lives to each other. While this resolves one aspect of the public/private tension, I close with a brief discussion of the remaining tension, and the role for normative constraints on signification to play in generating a genuinely shared public language

Hygieenisen suunnittelun peruskriteerit

49th R3Nordic Symposium - Cleanroom Technology, Contamination Control and Cleaning Proceedings, Gun Wirtanen & Raimo Pärssinen (eds.) ISBN 978-952-216-674-6 (pdf) Reports from Turku University of Applied Sciences 245see the pdf-fileNon peer reviewe

Raimo Anttila 1935–2023

Non peer reviewe

Illegal Immigration, Human Trafficking, and Organized Crime

illegal migration, human smuggling, human trafficking, organized crime, states, borders

On Causal Relations between Mental Organizer, Action under Mental Processes, and Social Environment

The purpose of the research was to study the relationships between mental organizers, action under mental process, and social environment through observation. A category system for each behavior was constructed and data were analyzed with matrices to find out kinds of root causes in causal dynamic. Reliability, subjectivity, and validity of observation were assessed. The coefficient of reliability was 0.937. The observation had about 11% subjectivity, and the frequencies were in the categories where they should be, mainly. Results indicate that there occurs causal variety. The causes are not stable. As an entity, the results show that it is possible to tackle mind processes through the causation. Furthermore, the processes are in series but they drop by in a parallel mode when the task becomes more difficult. However, the mindamic seems to have the greatest possible number of the degrees of freedom, simultaneously

An Empirical Test of a Postulate of a Mediating\ud Process between Mind Processes

The objective of the research was to verify a\ud postulate of a theory of mind processes. The\ud postulate stated that the mediating process of the\ud mind processes comprises of diffusion, absorption,\ud and assimilation through bursts of information. The\ud data were obtained from videotaped sessions. The\ud number of subjects was 78. Reliability of\ud observation was assessed with the help of the\ud coefficients of determination and alienation in\ud comparison with the randomized variables. The proper\ud analysis device was conditional probability.\ud Patterns occurred that enabled to indicate that\ud diffusion, absorption, and assimilation are real\ud processes between other mind processes; such as the\ud initial form, the mental shape, the mindy, and the\ud configuration. Thus the postulate has a high\ud probability of verification that makes it needless to\ud patch the wholes of the preliminary theory,\ud logically. The next phase is to find out the\ud associations of the entire preliminary construction\ud or the 8 processes with adult data.\u

On the Nature of Social and Institutional Reality

What is the nature of the social reality? How do the major social institutions like money or law exist? What are the limits of individualistically-oriented social theories?These and related problems are intensely discussed in philosophy, in legal theory and in the methodology of social sciences. This collection brings together the different traditions of the contemporary discussion. It includes thought-provoking articles by John Searle, Margaret Gilbert, Ota Weinberger, Raimo Tuomela, Eerik Lagerspetz, Michael Quante, Cristina Redondo and Paolo Comanducci. ”Wonderful selection of articles that contribute in important ways to the growing field of social ontology... A ’must-have’ for anyone working on issues of social ontology.” Deborah Tollefsen, University of Memphi