Social Capital Sebagai Mediator Antara Trust Dan Knowledge Sharing Studi Empiris Di Minimarket

The objective of this study is to identify the relation between trust, social capital, and knowledge sharing of mini market employee in Bandung. Employee have to depend on trust in their cooperative activities to justify their expected benefits from the knowledge sharing. Hence, cooperative act as mediator between trust and knowledge sharing. Knowledge sharing is an activity through which knowledge (namely, information, skills, or expertise) is exchanged among people, friends, families, communities or organizations; they are social processedfacilitated by social capital. The results of the analysis highlight significance relationship between trust – knowledge sharing and trust – knowledge sharing via social capital as mediator. As a result, trust is highly overrated as a main driver of knowledge sharing. Hence, social capital plays important role in knowledge sharing process, not trust

PERAN KNOWLEDGE SHARING SEBAGAI MEDIATOR PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS DENGAN INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR

The purpose of the study was to examine the influence of perceived organizational politics on innovative work behavior and to identify the mediating effect of employees’ knowledge sharing. A  questionnaire survey was carried out to 493 minimarket employees. Pearson’s correlation analysis was carried out to identify the characteristics of variables and their mutual relations, an multiple regression was also conducted for Baron & Kenny's (1986)’s mediated effect analysis.  The finding suggests that there exists a negative relationship between perceived organizational politics and knowledge sharing, and a positive relationship between knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior.  With regard to the role of knowledge sharing in the relation between perceived organizational politics and innovative work behavior, results of knowledge sharing as a full mediator have confirmed the hypothesis

Innovation Capability Performance through Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: an Empirical Study in the West Java Mini Market

This study explores how potential and realized absorptive capacity affects innovation capability. This study aims to empirically examine the path relationship between potential absorptive capacity, realized absorptive capacity, and innovation capability in mini market in West Java, thus enhance our understanding of the mechanism between absorptive capacity and innovation capability. The authors have conducted a survey among employees with a valid response from 597 respondents. Multiple regression was used to assess the research model. The results provide evidence to show that potential and realized absorptive capacity are positively related to innovation capability, but in different proportions, and potential absorptive capacity affects positively to realize absorptive capacity. This study will contribute in an acceptable way to highlight the effects and role of both the potential absorptive capacity and the realized absorptive capacity in their role as independent variables and the results of this in innovation capability in turn as a dependent variable.Keywords: potential absorptive capacity realized absorptive capacity innovation capabilit

Relationship between Knowledge Sharing, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation Capability: Empirical studies in minimarkets

This study aims to identify the relationship between knowledge sharing, innovation capabilities, and absorptive capacity. The study was conducted on 209 employees of a minimarket, in Bandung, West Java. Sampling was done incidentally. Factor analysis produces five factors for which construct validity is acceptable. Empirically, the multiple regression results support the research hypothesis. Knowledge sharing positively and significantly affects innovation capability and absorptive capacity. Furthermore, absorptive capacity partially mediates the relationship between knowledge sharing and innovation capabilities.

Mengelola Proses Tim

Work teams has become relatively common in organizations because brilliant execution that can onlybe done with teamwork. A team as a group of individuals who work together under a unity of purpose,as a united front. But develop team is not easy, take some years. When team leaders focus primarily onhard business tools, such as schedule, budget, and scope, they can lose sight of a more subjective aspectof the project—the team member. Each person brings a unique set of experiences and knowledge to theteam. Equally important are the social and behavioral skills that each individual uses to interact withother team members in forming a cohesive and productive team. At a team's inception, individuals do notinstantly become a cohesive and unified group. Each person has a personal norm that dictates his or herself-perceptions and exhibited behaviors in social settings. In a group, an individual uses these learnedbehaviors to influence others and, in turn, is influenced by other individuals on the team. Hence, processthat happened in team must managed in careful. In this case, this paper discusses level of team growth,cohesion, and norm in team

Kepercayaan Dalam Tim

Organizations are nowadays faced with a growing number of challenges for their successfuloperation in the current market and society. Their survival in the current turbulent market iscontinuously at risk and becomes uncertain. The competitive challenges of the last decade haveseen an increase in the number of organizations using teams as a new work design. Hence,organizations have become flatter and more team centred. So, a team is the most common andbasic working unit in today's business organizations. One of the most important elements thatdetermine the ability of teams to cooperate effectively is the ability of each team member to trustthe entire team and each of the other team members. Scholars have long been interested in thestudy of trust in organizations; trust is seen as one of the critical elements. Trust is critical toindividuals, organizations, and society in general. Trust is important because it is linked to thelevel of employee and organizational performance. Organizations that were identified as “hightrust” generally got more qualified applicants, experienced lower turnover, and healthcare costs,higher levels of customer satisfaction, and greater innovation and risk taking. Since breakingtrust gives rise to distrust, maintaining trust requires careful attention from management. Hightrust can account for a company's competitiveness in the long run

Mengelola Pekerja Pengetahuan

A growing belief has emerged that effectively managing knowledge can enhance per-formance. Prosperity now depends less on access to physical resources and more andmore on the ability to create economically useful new ideas. Knowledge is a centralfeature of post-industrial societies. The significance of knowledge as a vital resourcefor the world's economies has been underlined; it forms the basis for innovation andeconomic success. Knowledge has become the most important basis for competition.More organizations core competencies will center around managing knowledge andknowledge worker. Knowledge management is the strategy for creating, accessingand supporting this vital resource. The task of knowledge worker is acquisition,creation, packaging, or application of knowledge. However, the nature of knowledgework is different from administrative and operational work and that the people whoperform it resist structured approaches. Hence, a viable approach critically neededfor improving knowledge work

Penentu Perilaku Knowledge Sharing Para Karyawan Minimarket: Pendekatan Kualitatif

The purpose of this paper is to explore factors affecting knowledge sharing behaviour of workers in the minimarket’s organization in West Java. Knowledge sharing behaviour is the degree to which knowledge worker actuallyshares knowledge with other members of his/her organization. Based on the theory of planned behaviour, we tried to explore determinants of knowledge sharing in minimarket setting. Structural interview was then use to get the factors thatpromote knowledge sharing. This research identified behavioral and psycho-sociotechnological determinants as enablers of knowledge sharing activity

Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi terhadap Agilitas Organisasi (Study pada Fashion X)

An organization has the characteristic or particular identity for the purpose of uniting its members so as to have an overview of running the organization as reflected by the organizational culture in it. Strong organizational culture is one way to achieve agility, the new management approach to deal with changes. This research aimed to find out how the organizational culture and organizational agility and the influence of organizational culture on organizational agility in the case study at Fashion X. In this research method used quantitative and descriptive method and using questionnaires that distributed to 131 respondents and interviews. The study states that the organizational culture and organizational agility in Fashion X quite good, even though it needs upgrading for adhocracy, hierarchy, and competency. Both variables have strong positive relationship amounted to 0,548 and in Fashion X 30% organizational agility affected by organizational culture. Additionally regression equation Y = 64.323 + 0,657X. Organizational culture can be improved by increasing risk-taking by creating small teams, develop products, gathering, team building to enhance the innovative thought leaders, improving the way for more efficient delivery of goods, execution, product's strategy, situational leadership, technology, the power of employees, organizational ability, organizational changes, and customer's services

Mengelola Pekerja Pengetahuan

A growing belief has emerged that effectively managing knowledge can enhance per-formance. Prosperity now depends less on access to physical resources and more andmore on the ability to create economically useful new ideas. Knowledge is a centralfeature of post-industrial societies. The significance of knowledge as a vital resourcefor the world’s economies has been underlined; it forms the basis for innovation andeconomic success. Knowledge has become the most important basis for competition.More organizations core competencies will center around managing knowledge andknowledge worker. Knowledge management is the strategy for creating, accessingand supporting this vital resource. The task of knowledge worker is acquisition,creation, packaging, or application of knowledge. However, the nature of knowledgework is different from administrative and operational work and that the people whoperform it resist structured approaches. Hence, a viable approach critically neededfor improving knowledge work.Keywords: knowledge management, knowledge work, knowledge worke