Atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic NSCLC with high blood-based tumor mutational burden: primary analysis of BFAST cohort C randomized phase 3 trial

Non-small-cell lung cancer; Predictive markersCàncer de pulmó de cèl·lules no petites; Marcadors predictiusCáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas; Marcadores predictivosTumor mutational burden (TMB) is being explored as a predictive biomarker for cancer immunotherapy outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer. BFAST (NCT03178552)—an open-label, global, multicohort trial—evaluated the safety and efficacy of first-line targeted therapies or immunotherapy in patients with unresectable Stage IIIB or IV advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who were selected for biomarker status using blood-based targeted next-generation sequencing. In the Phase 3 cohort C evaluating blood-based (b)TMB as a biomarker of atezolizumab efficacy, patients with bTMB of ≥10 (N = 471) were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab or platinum-based chemotherapy per local standard of care. Cohort C did not meet its primary endpoint of investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the population with bTMB of ≥16 (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.59, 1.00; P = 0.053). Adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal occurred in 10% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 20% in the chemotherapy arm. Adverse events of special interest occurred in 42% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 26% in the chemotherapy arm. A prespecified exploratory analysis compared the bTMB clinical trial assay with the FoundationOne Liquid Companion Diagnostic assay and showed high concordance between assays. Additional exploration of bTMB to identify optimal cutoffs, confounding factors, assay improvements or cooperative biomarkers is warranted

ESMO Management and treatment adapted recommendations in the COVID-19 era : Lung cancer

The COVID-19 pandemic, characterised by a fast and global spread during the first months of 2020, has prompted the development of a structured set of recommendations for cancer care management, to maintain the highest possible standards. Within this framework, it is crucial to ensure no disruption to essential oncological services and guarantee the optimal care.This is a structured proposal for the management of lung cancer, comprising three levels of priorities, namely: tier 1 (high priority), tier 2 (medium priority) and tier 3 (low priority)-defined according to the criteria of the Cancer Care Ontario, Huntsman Cancer Institute and Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale.The manuscript emphasises the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung cancer care and reconsiders all steps from diagnosis, staging and treatment.These recommendations should, therefore, serve as guidance for prioritising the different aspects of cancer care to mitigate the possible negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of our patients.As the situation is rapidly evolving, practical actions are required to guarantee the best patients' treatment while protecting and respecting their rights, safety and well-being. In this environment, cancer practitioners have great responsibilities: provide timely, appropriate, compassionate and justified cancer care, while protecting themselves and their patients from being infected with COVID-19. In case of shortages, resources must be distributed fairly. Consequently, the following recommendations can be applied with significant nuances, depending on the time and location for their use, considering variable constraints imposed to the health systems. An exceptional flexibility is required from cancer caregivers

A phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation trial of oral TSR-011 in patients with advanced solid tumours and lymphomas

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements are oncogenic drivers in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). TSR-011 is a dual ALK and tropomyosin-related kinase (TRK) inhibitor, active against ALK inhibitor resistant tumours in preclinical studies. Here, we report the safety, tolerability and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of TSR-011 in patients with relapsed or refractory ALK- and TRK-positive advanced cancers. Methods: In this sequential, open-label, phase 1 trial (NCT02048488), patients received doses of 30 mg, escalated to 480 mg every 24 hours (Q24h), followed by an expansion cohort of patients with ALK-positive cancers. The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics. Results: TSR-011 320- and 480-mg Q24h doses exceeded the maximum tolerated dose. At the RP2D of 40 mg every 8 hours (Q8h), the most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 3.2–6.5% of patients. Of 14 ALK inhibitor-naive patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, 6 experienced partial responses and 8 had stable disease. Conclusions: At the RP2D (40 mg Q8h), TSR-011 demonstrated a favourable safety profile with acceptable QTc changes. Limited clinical activity was observed. Based on the competitive ALK inhibitor landscape and benefit/risk considerations, further TSR-011 development was discontinuedThis clinical trial was funded by TESAR

366 Combined exploratory immunophenotyping and transcriptomic tumor analysis in patients treated with OSE2101 vaccine in HLA-A2+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the ATALANTE-1 trial

BackgroundOSE2101 (Tedopi®) is an anticancer vaccine with HLA-A2+ restricted modified epitopes targeting five tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) frequently expressed in lung cancer (CEA, HER2, MAGE2, MAGE3, P53). Step-1 results of the phase III, randomized, open-label ATALANTE-1 study comparing Tedopi® vs standard treatment (SoC) showed a favorable benefit/risk of Tedopi® over SoC (HR 0.71 for overall survival OS) in HLA-A2+ NSCLC patients in 2nd or 3rd line treatment after progression on immune checkpoint blockers (ICB).1 We analyze available tumor biopsies at initial diagnosis from some patients treated with Tedopi® to determine the expression of the 5 TAAs and to identify other tumor factors associated with long-term survival.MethodsTumor biopsies were available for 8 HLA-A2+ (blood test) stage IV NSCLC patients included in the trial. Primary (<12 weeks) and secondary (≥ 12 weeks) resistance to ICB were observed in 3 (38%) and 5 (62%) of patients. Best response to Tedopi® and OS were: 1 partial response (PR) (OS of 33 months), 3 stable disease (SD) (OS of 22, 26 and 41 mo.) and 4 disease progression (PD) (OS of 3, 4, 30 and 31 mo.). HLA-class I, PD-L1, CD8 T-cells, HER2, CEA and P53 tumor expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). NanoString gene expression profiling was performed using the Pan Cancer Immune gene set.ResultsHLA-class I was expressed in all tumor samples. IHC analysis revealed that P53, CEA and HER2 were expressed in 6/7, 5/7 and 0/7 patients, respectively. P53, CEA, HER2, MAGE2, and MAGE3 were detected at RNA level in 5/5 tested patients (table 1). IMMUNOSCORE® IC CD8/PDL1 analysis showed High/High, High/Low and Low/Low scores for 1/7, 1/7 and 5/7 patients, respectively. The High/High IMMUNOSCORE® with a pronounced CD8+ T-cell tumor infiltration was observed in the patient with PR. High percentage of tumor cells expressing P53 (69%–97%) and overexpression of genes associated with activated macrophages (TREM2, MARCO, SLC11A1, CHIT1, SERPINB2) were observed in the PR and SD patients. High IFN-gamma and Expanded Immune Gene Signature scores were observed in long-term survivor patients with secondary resistance to ICB, even after progressive disease.Abstract 366 Table 1Summary of clinical and translational dataCEACarcinoembryonic antigen; HER2: Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2; ICB: Immune checkpoint blocker; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; ND: Not determined; OS: Overall Survival; Patient ID: Patient identification; PDL1: Programmed death-ligand 1; PFS: Progression-free survival; ssGSEA: Single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. Blue bars = Length of overall survival; Green bars = Gene Signature upregulation; Red bars = Gene Signature downregulationConclusionsThis study shows that all HLA-A2+ patients (blood test), expressed HLA class I in the tumors at initial diagnosis. Transcriptomic data in the patients that benefited from Tedopi® showed activated macrophage pathway, high IFN-gamma and Expanded Immune Gene Signatures scores. These data will be validated on larger number of patients treated with Tedopi® after the step 2 analysis.AcknowledgementsWe thank Julie Le Boulicaut, François Montestruc and Constant Josse (eXYSTAT, Malakoff, France) for the statistical analysis, and HalioDx for the IHC and NanoString analysis.Trial RegistrationEudraCT number2015-003183-36; NCT number: NCT02654587ReferenceGiaccone, et al. Activity of OSE-2101 in HLA-A2+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after failure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): step 1 results of phase III ATALANTE-1 randomised trial. ESMO meeting 2020, abstract #1260MO.Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol and its related documents (including the patient information and informed consent form) received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and the Competent Authority prior to study initiation.ConsentEach patient gave his/her written informed consent prior to study enrolment

IMpower030: Phase III study evaluating neoadjuvant treatment of resectable stage II-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with atezolizumab (atezo) + chemotherapy

n/

Afatinib in EGFR TKI-naïve patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations: An interim analysis of a phase IIIB trial

n/

Entrectinib in locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Integrated analysis of ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1 and STARTRK-2

Background Entrectinib is a potent inhibitor of ROS1 (in addition to TRKA/B/C), designed to effectively penetrate the central nervous system (CNS); brain metastases are common in patients with advanced ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC. Entrectinib achieves therapeutic levels in the CNS with antitumor activity in multiple intracranial tumor models. We present an updated integrated safety and efficacy analysis from three Phase I/II studies of entrectinib (ALKA-372-001 [EudraCT 2012-000148-88], STARTRK-1 [NCT02097810], STARTRK-2 [NCT02568267]) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLCs. Methods The analysis included patients with ROS1 inhibitor-naive NSCLC harboring a ROS1 fusion identified via nucleic acid-based diagnostic platforms. The ROS1 safety-evaluable population included patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who received ≥1 dose of entrectinib; the integrated efficacy analysis included patients with at least 6 months of follow-up. Tumor assessments were done at week 4 and every 8 weeks thereafter. Blinded independent central review (BICR), RECIST v1.1 was performed. Primary endpoints by BICR: overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR). Key secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), safety. Additional endpoints: intracranial ORR (complete/partial responses), DOR in patients with an intracranial response, PFS in patients with baseline CNS disease. Results In the ROS1 safety-evaluable population (n=134), at least one treatment-related AE (TRAE) of any grade was seen in 93% of patients. Patients with at least one TRAE by highest grade were: grade 1/2, 59%; grade 3, 31%; grade 4, 4%. There were no grade 5 TRAEs. TRAEs led to dose reduction or discontinuation in 34% and 5% of patients, respectively. In the efficacy-evaluable population (n=53 patients with treatment-naive, ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC; median age 53 years, 64% female, 59% never smokers), BICR-assessed ORR was 77% (95% CI 64-88), complete responses n=3 (6%). Median BICR-assessed DOR: 25 mo (95% CI 11-35). Median BICR-assessed PFS: 26 mo (95% CI 16-37) and 14 mo (95% CI 5-NR) for patients without (n=30) and with CNS disease (n=23) at baseline, respectively. In patients with baseline CNS disease (per BICR assessment, n=20), intracranial ORR was 55% (95% CI 32-77) and median intracranial DOR in patients with an intracranial response (n=11) was 13 mo (95% CI 6-not reached). Conclusion Entrectinib is highly active in patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, including those with CNS disease. Entrectinib is well tolerated and has a manageable safety profile. Citation Format: Alexander Drilon, Fabrice Barlesi, Filippo De Braud, Byoung Chul Cho, Myung-Ju Ahn, Salvatore Siena, Matthew G. Krebs, Chia-Chi Lin, Tom John, Daniel SW Tan, Takashi Seto, Rafal Dziadziuszko, Hendrick-Tobias Arkenau, Christian Rolfo, Jurgen Wolf, Chenglin Ye, Todd Riehl, Susan Eng, Robert C. Doebele. Entrectinib in locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Integrated analysis of ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1 and STARTRK-2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT192