20 research outputs found

    Diferenças de nichos entre duas espécies simpåtricas de lagartos (Cnemidophorus abaetensis e C. ocellifer) em habitat de restinga no nordeste do Brasil

    Get PDF
    Differences among sympatric lizard species usually result from differences in the use of three resources: space, time and food or some combination of these three. However, differences in resource utilization among sympatric species may simply reflect their specific ecological needs rather than competitive pressures. In this study, we analyzed the temporal, spatial and food niche of two congeneric teiids (Cnemidophorus abaetensis and C. ocellifer) living sympatrically in the "restinga" habitat of AbaetĂ© in the Salvador Municipality, Bahia State, Brazil to assess the degree of niche differentiation among them. The whiptail species overlapped considerably in an hourly activity (Ojk = 0.93), in microhabitat use (Ojk = 0.97) and in the prey items consumed (Ojk = 0.89). Differences in amount of vegetation in the microhabitats used by both lizard species may have contributed to differences in the activity period and in the distribution of the main prey eaten by these lizards which may, in turn, facilitate their coexistence in AbaetĂ©. Although sympatric C. ocellifer and C. abaetensis in AbaetĂ© differed only slightly in their use of microhabitats, period of activity and diet, the most important niche dimension segregating the two species seemed to be the food niche._____________________________________________________________________________________ RESUMO: As diferenças entre espĂ©cies simpĂĄtricas geralmente podem ser atribuĂ­das Ă s variaçÔes na utilização de trĂȘs dimensĂ”es primĂĄrias de recurso: o perĂ­odo de atividade, o microhabitat e o alimento ou a alguma combinação das trĂȘs. No entanto, tais diferenças na utilização de recursos entre espĂ©cies simpĂĄtricas tĂȘm sido sugeridas mais como um reflexo de suas necessidades ecolĂłgicas especĂ­ficas do que resultado de pressĂŁo competitiva. Neste estudo, avaliou-se o nicho temporal, o espacial e o alimentar de dois teĂ­deos cogenĂ©ricos (Cnemidophorus abaetensis e C. ocellifer) vivendo em simpatria na restinga de AbaetĂ© em Salvador, Bahia. As duas espĂ©cies de lagartos sobrepĂ”em-se consideravelmente no perĂ­odo de atividade (Ojk = 0,93), no uso dos microhabitats (Ojk = 0,97) e nos tipos de presas consumidas (Ojk = 0,89). As diferenças na quantidade de vegetação nos microhabitats utilizadas pelas duas espĂ©cies podem ter contribuĂ­do para as diferenças no perĂ­odo de atividade e na distribuição dos principais tipos de presas consumidas por estas duas espĂ©cies de lagartos, o que pode ter favorecido a coexistĂȘncia entre elas na restinga do AbaetĂ©. No entanto, as diferenças na dieta sĂŁo as mais significativas para a segregação

    Wheeled robots

    No full text
    The use of mobile robots in applications is steadily increasing, both in the industrial and the service domains. Most mobile robots achieve locomotion using wheels. As a consequence, they are subject to differential constraints that are nonholonomic, i.e., non-integrable. This article reviews the kinematic models of wheeled robots arising from these constraints and discusses their fundamental properties and limitations from a control viewpoint. An overview of the main approaches for trajectory planning and feedback motion control is provided

    Non-decoupled Locomotion and Manipulation Planning for Low-Dimensional Systems

    No full text
    International audienceWe demonstrate the possibility of solving planning problems by inter-leaving locomotion and manipulation in a non-decoupled way. We choose three low-dimensional minimalistic robotic systems and use them to illustrate our paradigm: a basic one-legged locomotor, a two-link manipulator with a manipulated object, and a simultaneous locomotion-and-manipulation system. Using existing motion planning and control methods initially designed for either locomotion or manipulation tasks, we see how they apply to both our locomotion-only and manipulation-only systems through parallel derivations, and extend them to the simultaneous locomotion-and-manipulation system. Motion planning is solved for these three systems using two different methods : (i) a geometric path-planning-based one, and (ii) a kinematic control-theoretic-based one. Motion control is then derived by dynamically realizing the geometric paths or kinematic trajectories under the Couloumb friction model using torques as control inputs. All three methods apply successfully to all three systems, showing that the non-decoupled planning is possible
    corecore