Data logging templates for the environmental, health and safety assessment of nanomaterials

Under the JRC's leadership and in the frame of the EU-funded FP7 flagship project NANoREG, a team of experts in different fields (physical-chemistry, in vivo and in vitro toxicology) has produced a set of easy-to-use templates aimed at harmonising the logging of experimentally-produced data in the field of nano- environmental, health and safety (nanoEHS). The templates are freely available to the nanoEHS community (Common Creative Licence – Share alike) as jump start towards the harmonisation, sharing and linking of data, with the purpose of bringing benefits to the data management at European level and beyond. They have a common first part to identify the sample under investigation; a second part aimed at recording basic information on the dispersion method adopted and to record the essential parameters used to fully describe an assay (the experimental settings); and a third one to log the experimental results. The experimental parameters, their values, together with the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) linked to a given template, allow to critically evaluate and/or to compare the results of a given assay performed in different laboratories. This approach should also allow reproducing the assay at a later stage. The structure adopted for the templates tries to reflect the ISA-TAB logic, already widely used in 'omics' studies.JRC.F.2-Consumer Products Safet

NANoREG harmonised terminology for environmental health and safety assessment of nanomaterials

Several terms in the field of environmental health and safety (EHS) assessment of chemicals and nanomaterials (hereinafter NMs) have been defined or used by the scientific community and different organisations, including international bodies, European authorities, and industry associations. This is also true for multidisciplinary projects such as NANoREG, which aims at supporting regulatory authorities and industry in dealing with EHS issues of manufactured NMs. The objective of the present JRC technical report is to publish the harmonised terminology that has been developed and used within NANoREG. It has been agreed upon and adopted by all project partners in their activities and related documents. The report specifically includes: i) the methodology used to select key terms that form the harmonised terminology and to develop harmonised definitions; ii) the existing literature definitions that have been used as a starting point to develop for each key term a harmonised definition; and iii) the reason(s) behind the choices that have been made in drafting a definition. As far as possible, the harmonised definition is reproducing (an) already existing definition text(s), thus avoiding the creation of new and unwelcome information. The discussion on the key terms to be considered for the harmonised terminology led to the selection of 43 key terms. The list includes terms with international regulatory relevance, such as those defined at OECD level, as well as terms that have a specific meaning and use under REACH. The 'NANoREG Harmonised Terminology' has already proven very useful in the context of the OECD work, as support document to the April 2016 OECD Expert Meeting on 'Grouping and read-across for the hazard assessment of manufactured nanomaterials', and in a regulatory context, as support document to the work recently released by RIVM, ECHA and JRC on using (eco)toxicological data for bridging data gaps between nanoforms of the same substance (March 2016). For quick access, the 'NANoREG Harmonised Terminology' is reported in Section 3.JRC.I.4-Nanobioscience

Advanced materials foresight: research and innovation indicators related to advanced and smart nanomaterials

Background: Advanced materials are most likely to bring future economic, environmental and social benefits. At the same time, they may pose challenges regarding their safety and sustainability along the entire lifecycle. This needs to be timely addressed by the stakeholders (industry, research, policy, funding and regulatory bodies). As part of a larger foresight project, this study aimed to identify areas of scientific research and technological development related to advanced materials, in particular advanced nanomaterials and the sub-group of smart nanomaterials. The study identified and collected data to build relevant research and innovation indicators and analyse trends, impact and other implications. Methods: This study consisted of an iterative process including a documentation phase followed by the identification, description and development of a set of core research and innovation indicators regarding scientific publications, EU projects and patents. The data was extracted mainly from SCOPUS, CORDIS and PATSTAT databases using a predefined search string that included representative keywords. The trends, distributions and other aspects reflected in the final version of the indicators were analysed, e.g. the number of items in a period of time, geographical distribution, organisations involved, categories of journals, funding programmes, costs and technology areas. Results: Generally, for smart nanomaterials the data used represent around 3.5% of the advanced nanomaterials data, while for each field analysed, they represent 4.4% for publications, 13% for projects and 1.1% for patents. The study shows current trends for advanced nanomaterials at a top-level information that can be further extended with sub-indicators. Generally, the results indicated a significant growth in research into advanced nanomaterials, including smart nanomaterials, in the last decade, leading to an increased availability of information. Conclusion: These indicators identify trends regarding scientific and technological achievements and represent an important element when examining possible impacts on society and policy implications associated to these areas

Advanced materials foresight: research and innovation indicators related to advanced and smart nanomaterials [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Background: Advanced materials are most likely to bring future economic, environmental and social benefits. At the same time, they may pose challenges regarding their safety and sustainability along the entire lifecycle. This needs to be timely addressed by the stakeholders (industry, research, policy, funding and regulatory bodies). As part of a larger foresight project, this study aimed to identify areas of scientific research and technological development related to advanced materials, in particular advanced nanomaterials and the sub-group of smart nanomaterials. The study identified and collected data to build relevant research and innovation indicators and analyse trends, impact and other implications. Methods: This study consisted of an iterative process including a documentation phase followed by the identification, description and development of a set of core research and innovation indicators regarding scientific publications, EU projects and patents. The data was extracted mainly from SCOPUS, CORDIS and PATSTAT databases using a predefined search string that included representative keywords. The trends, distributions and other aspects reflected in the final version of the indicators were analysed, e.g. the number of items in a period of time, geographical distribution, organisations involved, categories of journals, funding programmes, costs and technology areas. Results: Generally, for smart nanomaterials the data used represent around 3.5% of the advanced nanomaterials data, while for each field analysed, they represent 4.4% for publications, 13% for projects and 1.1% for patents. The study shows current trends for advanced nanomaterials at a top-level information that can be further extended with sub-indicators. Generally, the results indicated a significant growth in research into advanced nanomaterials, including smart nanomaterials, in the last decade, leading to an increased availability of information. Conclusion: These indicators identify trends regarding scientific and technological achievements and represent an important element when examining possible impacts on society and policy implications associated to these areas

An overview of concepts and terms used in the European Commission's definition of nanomaterial

This report supports the implementation of the European Commission’s Recommendation on a definition of nanomaterial (2011/696/EU). It addresses its key concepts and terms and discusses them in a regulatory context. Corresponding to the broad scope of the definition the considerations in this report can be applied across all relevant legislative areas; they are not specific to any particular piece of legislation. The report provides recommendations for a harmonised and coherent implementation of the nanomaterial definition in any specific regulatory context at European Union and national level.JRC.F.2-Consumer Products Safet

Safe and sustainable by design chemicals and materials. Framework for the definition of criteria and evaluation procedure for chemicals and materials

The EU CSS action plan foresees the development of a framework to define safe and sustainable by design (SSbD) criteria for chemicals and materials. The SSbD is an approach to support the design, development, production and use of chemicals and materials that focuses on providing a desirable function (or service), while avoiding or minimising harmful impacts to human health and the environment. The SSbD concept integrates aspects for the domain of safety, circularity and functionality of chemicals and materials, with sustainability consideration throughout their lifecycle, minimising their environmental footprint. SSbD aims at facilitating the industrial transition towards a safe, zero pollution, climate-neutral and resource-efficient economy, addressing adverse effects on humans, ecosystems and biodiversity from a lifecycle perspective. To fulfil these ambitions, there is the need to develop a new framework for the definition of safe and sustainable by design criteria for chemicals and materials. To do so, several frameworks were reviewed including initiatives from research, industry, governmental agencies and NGOs. Capitalising on this information, a framework was developed and is presented in this report including a methodology for the definition of possible SSbD criteria and implementation mechanisms

Physicochemical characterisation of gold, silica and silver nanoparticles in water and in serum-containing cell culture media

This report presents the results from a study organised under the coordination of JRC as part of a project aiming at the adaptation of the in vitro micronucleus test (Test Guideline 487) for the assessment of manufactured NMs. The aim of the first step of the project was to evaluate the physicochemical characterisation of selected representative nanomaterials (5 nm gold, 30 nm gold, 22 nm silica, 30 nm citrate and 30 nm PVP stabilised silver nanoparticles) in pure water and in different complete culture media. The results of the study show that using a combination of different characterisation techniques is important to providing reliable information about the agglomeration behaviour of the tested nanoparticles in complete cell culture media (CCM). Most of the materials exhibited mild agglomeration in serum containing CCM. Only the PVP functionalised silver nanoparticles showed a size distribution change in all of the culture media that is so small that it could be attributed to solely protein adsorption without notable agglomeration. Silica nanoparticles were found to be the most sensitive to interaction with serum containing CCM, showing massive concentration and time dependent agglomeration strongly affected by the CCM composition. Extensive agglomeration might lead also to the accelerated sedimentation of the particles changing drastically the true, effective dose that the cells will receive under in vitro conditions1, 2. Thus, it has to be investigated in more detail and taken in account when designing in vitro experiments in the next phase of the project.JRC.F.2-Consumer Products Safet

Towards a review of the EC Recommendation for a definition of the term "nanomaterial": Part 3: Scientific-technical evaluation of options to clarify the definition and to facilitate its implementation

This report provides the JRC's scientific-technical evaluation of options to clarify the EC Recommendation on a definition of nanomaterial, published in 2011 (EC Recommendation 2011/696/EU). It is a follow-up report of two previous JRC publications, which compiled feedback on the experiences of stakeholders with the EC nanomaterial definition collected by JRC in 2013 and early 2014 (EUR 26567 EN, 2014), and provided an assessment of the collected information (EUR 26744 EN, 2014). The three JRC reports are part of the review process foreseen in the 2011 EC Recommendation. The evaluation shows that the scope of the definition regarding the origin of nanomaterials should remain unchanged, addressing natural, incidental as well as manufactured nanomaterials. Moreover, because of the regulatory purpose of the definition, there is little evidence to support deviating from size as the sole defining property of a nanoparticle or from the range of 1 nm to 100 nm as definition of the nanoscale. Besides the need for clarification of some terms used in the definition additional implementation guidance would be useful. The role of the volume specific surface area deserves clarification and a method to prove that a material is not a nanomaterial would be helpful. A strategy how to avoid unintended inclusion of materials and the list of explicitly included materials deserve also attention.JRC.I.4-Nanobioscience

Physico-chemical properties of manufactured nanomaterials - Characterisation and relevant methods. An outlook based on the OECD Testing Programme.

Identifying and characterising nanomaterials require additional information on physico-chemical properties and test methods, compared to chemicals in general. Furthermore, regulatory decisions for chemicals are usually based upon certain toxicological properties, and these effects may not be equivalent to those for nanomaterials. However, regulatory agencies lack an authoritative decision framework for nanomaterials that links the relevance of certain physico-chemical endpoints to toxicological effects. This paper investigates various physico-chemical endpoints and available test methods that could be used to produce such a decision framework for nanomaterials. It presents an overview of regulatory relevance and methods used for testing fifteen proposed physico-chemical properties of eleven nanomaterials in the OECD Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials' Testing Programme, complemented with methods from literature, and assesses the methods' adequacy and applications limits. Most endpoints are of regulatory relevance, though the specific parameters depend on the nanomaterial and type of assessment. Size (distribution) is the common characteristic of all nanomaterials and is decisive information for classifying a material as a nanomaterial. Shape is an important particle descriptor. The octanol-water partitioning coefficient is undefined for particulate nanomaterials. Methods, including sample preparation, need to be further standardised, and some new methods are needed. The current work of OECD's Test Guidelines Programme regarding physico-chemical properties is highlighted

Towards a review of the EC Recommendation for a definition of the term "nanomaterial"; Part 1: Compilation of information concerning the experience with the definition

In October 2011 the European Commission (EC) published a Recommendation on the definition of nanomaterial (2011/696/EU). The purpose of this definition is to enable determination when a material should be considered a nanomaterial for regulatory purposes in the European Union. In view of the upcoming review of the current EC Definition of the term 'nanomaterial' and noting the need expressed by the EC Environment Directorate General and other Commission services for a set of scientifically sound reports as the basis for this review, the EC Joint Research Centre (JRC) prepares three consecutive reports, of which this is the first. This Report 1 compiles information concerning the experience with the definition regarding scientific-technical issues that should be considered when reviewing the current EC definition of nanomaterial. Based on this report and the feedback received, JRC will write a second, follow-up report. In this Report 2 the JRC will provide a detailed assessment of the scientific-technical issues compiled in Report 1, in relation to the objective of reviewing the current EC nanomaterial definition.JRC.I.4-Nanobioscience