16 research outputs found

    Are tangles as toxic as they look?

    Get PDF
    Neurofibrillary tangles are intracellular accumulations of hyperphosphorylated and misfolded tau protein characteristic of Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies. Classic cross-sectional studies of Alzheimer patient brains showed associations of tangle accumulation with neuronal loss, synapse loss, and dementia, which led to the supposition that tangles are toxic to neurons. More recent advances in imaging techniques and mouse models have allowed the direct exploration of the question of toxicity of aggregated versus soluble tau and have surprisingly challenged the view of tangles as toxic species in the brain. Here, we review these recent experiments on the nature of the toxicity of tau with particular emphasis on our experiments imaging tangles in the intact brain through a cranial window, which allows observation of tangle formation and longitudinal imaging of the fate of tangle-bearing neurons. Neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) were first described in 1906 by Alois Alzheimer based on Bielschowsky silver staining of the brain of his demented patient Auguste D (Alzheimer 1907; Goedert and Spillantini 2006). These intraneuronal aggregates have subsequently been found to be composed primarily of hyperphosphorylated tau protein and are definitive pathological lesions not only in Alzheimer's disease but also in a class of neurodegenerative tauopathies (Goedert et al. 1988; Spires-Jones et al. 2009). NFT pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD) correlates closely with cognitive decline and synapse and neuronal loss (Braak and Braak 1997; Bretteville and Planel 2008; Congdon and Duff 2008; Mocanu et al. 2008b; Spires-Jones et al. 2009). As a result, NFT have long been considered indicative of impending neuronal cell death. More recent evidence, however, opposes this classical view. Here we review evidence addressing the question of whether NFT cause structural or functional neuronal damage

    Tau-based treatment strategies in neurodegenerative diseases

    Full text link

    Human Cannabinoid 1 GPCR C-Terminal Domain Interacts with Bilayer Phospholipids to Modulate the Structure of its Membrane Environment

    No full text
    G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play critical physiological and therapeutic roles. The human cannabinoid 1 GPCR (hCB1) is a prime pharmacotherapeutic target for addiction and cardiometabolic disease. Our prior biophysical studies on the structural biology of a synthetic peptide representing the functionally significant hCB1 transmembrane helix 7 (TMH7) and its cytoplasmic extension, helix 8 (H8), [hCB1(TMH7/H8)] demonstrated that the helices are oriented virtually perpendicular to each other in membrane-mimetic environments. We identified several hCB1(TMH7/H8) structure-function determinants, including multiple electrostatic amino-acid interactions and a proline kink involving the highly conserved NPXXY motif. In phospholipid bicelles, TMH7 structure, orientation, and topology relative to H8 are dynamically modulated by the surrounding membrane phospholipid bilayer. These data provide a contextual basis for the present solid-state NMR study to investigate whether intermolecular interactions between hCB1(TMH7/H8) and its phospholipid environment may affect membrane-bilayer structure. For this purpose, we measured 1H–13C heteronuclear dipolar couplings for the choline, glycerol, and acyl-chain regions of dimyristoylphosphocholine in a magnetically aligned hCB1(TMH7/H8) bicelle sample. The results identify discrete regional interactions between hCB1(TMH7/H8) and membrane lipid molecules that increase phospholipid motion and decrease phospholipid order, indicating that the peptide’s partial traversal of the bilayer alters membrane structure. These data offer new insight into hCB1(TMH7/H8) properties and support the concept that the membrane bilayer itself may serve as a mechanochemical mediator of hCB1/GPCR signal transduction. Since interaction with its membrane environment has been implicated in hCB1 function and its modulation by small-molecule therapeutics, our work should help inform hCB1 pharmacology and the design of hCB1-targeted drugs

    Cannabinoid Agonist and Inverse Agonist Regulation of G Protein Coupling

    No full text
    corecore