21 research outputs found
Supernova Interaction with a Circumstellar Medium
The explosion of a core collapse supernova drives a powerful shock front into
the wind from the progenitor star. A layer of shocked circumstellar gas and
ejecta develops that is subject to hydrodynamic instabilities. The hot gas can
be observed directly by its X-ray emission, some of which is absorbed and
re-radiated at lower frequencies by the ejecta and the circumstellar gas.
Synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons accelerated at the shock
fronts provides information on the mass loss density if free-free absorption
dominates at early times or the size of the emitting region if synchrotron
self-absorption dominates. Analysis of the interaction leads to information on
the density and structure of the ejecta and the circumstellar medium, and the
abundances in these media. The emphasis here is on the physical processes
related to the interaction.Comment: 22 pages, 7 figures, to appear as a Chapter in "Supernovae and
Gamma-Ray Bursts," edited by K. W. Weiler (Springer-Verlag
Cholinesterase Inhibitors for Alzheimer Disease: Multitargeting Strategy based on Anti-Alzheimer's Drugs Repositioning
International audienceIn the brain, acetylcholine (ACh) is regarded as one of the major neurotransmitters. During the advancement of Alzheimer's disease (AD) cholinergic deficits occur and this can lead to extensive cognitive dysfunction and decline. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) remains a highly feasible target for the symptomatic improvement of AD. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) remains a highly viable target for the symptomatic improvementin AD because cholinergic deficit is a consistent and early finding in AD. The treatment approach of inhibitingperipheral AChE for myasthenia gravis had effectively proven that AChE inhibition was a reachable therapeutictarget. Subsequently tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine were developed and approved for thesymptomatic treatment of AD. Since then, multiple cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) have been continued to bedeveloped. These include newer ChEIs, naturally derived ChEIs, hybrids, and synthetic analogues. In this paper,we summarize the different types of ChEIs which are under development and their respective mechanisms ofactions
Safety and Outcome of Revascularization Treatment in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and COVID-19: The Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry.
COVID-19 related inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and coagulopathy may increase the bleeding risk and lower efficacy of revascularization treatments in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of revascularization treatments in patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19.
Retrospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular treatment (EVT) between March 2020 and June 2021, tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection. With a doubly-robust model combining propensity score weighting and multivariate regression, we studied the association of COVID-19 with intracranial bleeding complications and clinical outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed according to treatment groups (IVT-only and EVT).
Of a total of 15128 included patients from 105 centers, 853 (5.6%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. 5848 (38.7%) patients received IVT-only, and 9280 (61.3%) EVT (with or without IVT). Patients with COVID-19 had a higher rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.53; 95% CI 1.16-2.01), symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SSAH) (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.20-2.69), SICH and/or SSAH combined (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.23-1.99), 24-hour (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.58-3.86) and 3-month mortality (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.52-2.33).COVID-19 patients also had an unfavorable shift in the distribution of the modified Rankin score at 3 months (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.26-1.60).
Patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19 showed higher rates of intracranial bleeding complications and worse clinical outcomes after revascularization treatments than contemporaneous non-COVID-19 treated patients. Current available data does not allow direct conclusions to be drawn on the effectiveness of revascularization treatments in COVID-19 patients, or to establish different treatment recommendations in this subgroup of patients with ischemic stroke. Our findings can be taken into consideration for treatment decisions, patient monitoring and establishing prognosis