49 research outputs found
Inversion of Gamow's Formula and Inverse Scattering
We present a pedagogical description of the inversion of Gamow's tunnelling
formula and we compare it with the corresponding classical problem. We also
discuss the issue of uniqueness in the solution and the result is compared with
that obtained by the method of Gel'fand and Levitan. We hope that the article
will be a valuable source to students who have studied classical mechanics and
have some familiarity with quantum mechanics.Comment: LaTeX, 6 figurs in eps format. New abstract; notation in last
equation has been correcte
The use of mathematical modelling for improving the tissue engineering of organs and stem cell therapy
© 2016 Bentham Science Publishers.Regenerative medicine is a multidisciplinary field where continued progress relies on the incorporation of a diverse set of technologies from a wide range of disciplines within medicine, science and engineering. This review describes how one such technique, mathematical modelling, can be utilised to improve the tissue engineering of organs and stem cell therapy. Several case studies, taken from research carried out by our group, ACTREM, demonstrate the utility of mechanistic mathematical models to help aid the design and optimisation of protocols in regenerative medicine
On the verge of Umdeutung in Minnesota: Van Vleck and the correspondence principle (Part One)
In October 1924, the Physical Review, a relatively minor journal at the time,
published a remarkable two-part paper by John H. Van Vleck, working in virtual
isolation at the University of Minnesota. Van Vleck combined advanced
techniques of classical mechanics with Bohr's correspondence principle and
Einstein's quantum theory of radiation to find quantum analogues of classical
expressions for the emission, absorption, and dispersion of radiation. For
modern readers Van Vleck's paper is much easier to follow than the famous paper
by Kramers and Heisenberg on dispersion theory, which covers similar terrain
and is widely credited to have led directly to Heisenberg's "Umdeutung" paper.
This makes Van Vleck's paper extremely valuable for the reconstruction of the
genesis of matrix mechanics. It also makes it tempting to ask why Van Vleck did
not take the next step and develop matrix mechanics himself.Comment: 82 page