19 research outputs found

    Why Does Executive Greed Prevail in the United States and Canada but Not in Japan? The Pattern of Low CEO Pay and High Worker Welfare in Japanese Corporations

    Get PDF
    According to a list of the 200 most highly-paid chief executives at the largest U.S. public companies in 2013, Oracle’s Lawrence J. Ellison remained the best paid CEO and earned 96.2millionastotalannualcompensationlastyear.Hehasreceived96.2 million as total annual compensation last year. He has received 1.8 billion over the past 20 years. The lowest paid on the same list is General Motors’ D. F. Akerson who earned 11.1million.Theaveragenationalpayforanon−supervisoryUSworkerwas11.1 million. The average national pay for a non-supervisory US worker was 51,200 last year and a CEO made 354 times more than an average worker in 2012. Hunter Harrison, Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd., was the best paid CEO in Canada for 2012 and received 49.2−millionastotalannualcompensation,significantlyhigherthanthe2011bestpaidCEO,Magna’sF.Stronachwhoreceived49.2-million as total annual compensation, significantly higher than the 2011 best paid CEO, Magna’s F. Stronach who received 40.9 million. In 2011, the average annual salary was 45,488andCanada’stop50CEOsearned235timesmorethantheaverageCanadian.TheseexecutivepaypracticescontrastwiththegrowinginequalityinCanada,recentlyillustratedwiththefindingthat4045,488 and Canada’s top 50 CEOs earned 235 times more than the average Canadian. These executive pay practices contrast with the growing inequality in Canada, recently illustrated with the finding that 40% of Indigenous children live in poverty. In contrast, Japan’s highest paid CEO is Nissan Motor Co.’s Carlos Ghosn who earned 988 million yen (US10.1 million) in the year ended March 2013, little changed from the previous year and modestly improved from his US9.5millioncompensationfor2009.Thatdoesnotevenputhimamongthetop200mosthighly−paidU.S.companychiefsandthetop20bestpaidCEOsinCanadafor2012.WhyareJapaneseCEOspaidconsiderablylessthantheirAmericanorCanadiancounterparts?Thisessayarguesthattheactivismoflong−termorientedinstitutionalinvestorssuchasbanksandthetyingofexecutivepaytoworkerwelfareinthecontextofacultureofintolerancetoexcessiveexecutivecompensationexplaintoagreatextentthedevelopmentofapatternoflowexecutivepayinJapandespitetherecentweakeningofbankmonitoringasaresultoftheadoptionofU.S.governancestyleinsomeJapanesecompanies.TheJapaneseexperiencealsodemonstratesthatlowerexecutivecompensationdoesnotresultincompromisingfirmperformanceandisanecessaryconditiontobuildastakeholder−friendlycorporation.Forexample,theCEOofToyota(world’sbiggestautomaker),AkioToyoda,earned184millionyen( 9.5 million compensation for 2009. That does not even put him among the top 200 most highly-paid U.S. company chiefs and the top 20 best paid CEOs in Canada for 2012. Why are Japanese CEOs paid considerably less than their American or Canadian counterparts? This essay argues that the activism of long-term oriented institutional investors such as banks and the tying of executive pay to worker welfare in the context of a culture of intolerance to excessive executive compensation explain to a great extent the development of a pattern of low executive pay in Japan despite the recent weakening of bank monitoring as a result of the adoption of U.S. governance style in some Japanese companies. The Japanese experience also demonstrates that lower executive compensation does not result in compromising firm performance and is a necessary condition to build a stakeholder-friendly corporation. For example, the CEO of Toyota (world’s biggest automaker), Akio Toyoda, earned 184 million yen (1.9 million) in 2012, a 35 percent increase from the previous year. He is the lowest-paid chief of the world’s five biggest automakers and led Toyota to generate the highest return last year among the top five global automakers. Toyota’s outlook for increasing profit prompted the automaker to approve the biggest bonus for workers in the last years. Alan Mulally, Ford Motor’s chief and the best paid among the top five, took home $21 million in 2012

    Outcomes and Risk Factors for Complications of Laser Ablation for Thyroid Nodules: A Multicenter Study on 1531 Patients

    Get PDF
    Image-guided laser ablation therapy (LAT) of benign thyroid nodules demonstrated favorable results in randomized trials with fixed modalities of treatment. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to assess the effectiveness, tolerability, and complications of LAT in a large consecutive series of patients from centers using this technique in their routine clinical activity

    Minimally-invasive treatments for benign thyroid nodules: recommendations for information to patients and referring physicians by the Italian Minimally-Invasive Treatments of the Thyroid group

    Get PDF
    Purpose: In this paper, the members of the Italian Working Group on Minimally-Invasive Treatments of the Thyroid (MITT group) aim to summarize the most relevant information that could be of help to referring physicians and that should be provided to patients when considering the use of MITT for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules. Methods: An interdisciplinary board of physicians with specific expertise in the management of thyroid nodules was appointed by the Italian MITT Group. A systematic literature search was performed, and an evidence-based approach was used, including also the knowledge and the practical experience of the panelists to develop the paper. Results: The paper provides a list of questions that are frequently asked by patients to operators performing MITT, each with a brief and detailed answer and more relevant literature references to be consulted. Conclusions: This paper summarizes the most relevant information to be provided to patients and general practitioners/referring physicians about the use of MITT for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules

    Why Does Executive Greed Prevail in the United States and Canada but Not in Japan? The Pattern of Low CEO Pay and High Worker Welfare in Japanese Corporations

    Get PDF
    According to a list of the 200 most highly-paid chief executives at the largest U.S. public companies in 2013, Oracle’s Lawrence J. Ellison remained the best paid CEO and earned 96.2millionastotalannualcompensationlastyear.Hehasreceived96.2 million as total annual compensation last year. He has received 1.8 billion over the past 20 years. The lowest paid on the same list is General Motors’ D. F. Akerson who earned 11.1million.Theaveragenationalpayforanon−supervisoryUSworkerwas11.1 million. The average national pay for a non-supervisory US worker was 51,200 last year and a CEO made 354 times more than an average worker in 2012. Hunter Harrison, Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd., was the best paid CEO in Canada for 2012 and received 49.2−millionastotalannualcompensation,significantlyhigherthanthe2011bestpaidCEO,Magna’sF.Stronachwhoreceived49.2-million as total annual compensation, significantly higher than the 2011 best paid CEO, Magna’s F. Stronach who received 40.9 million. In 2011, the average annual salary was 45,488andCanada’stop50CEOsearned235timesmorethantheaverageCanadian.TheseexecutivepaypracticescontrastwiththegrowinginequalityinCanada,recentlyillustratedwiththefindingthat4045,488 and Canada’s top 50 CEOs earned 235 times more than the average Canadian. These executive pay practices contrast with the growing inequality in Canada, recently illustrated with the finding that 40% of Indigenous children live in poverty. In contrast, Japan’s highest paid CEO is Nissan Motor Co.’s Carlos Ghosn who earned 988 million yen (US10.1 million) in the year ended March 2013, little changed from the previous year and modestly improved from his US9.5millioncompensationfor2009.Thatdoesnotevenputhimamongthetop200mosthighly−paidU.S.companychiefsandthetop20bestpaidCEOsinCanadafor2012.WhyareJapaneseCEOspaidconsiderablylessthantheirAmericanorCanadiancounterparts?Thisessayarguesthattheactivismoflong−termorientedinstitutionalinvestorssuchasbanksandthetyingofexecutivepaytoworkerwelfareinthecontextofacultureofintolerancetoexcessiveexecutivecompensationexplaintoagreatextentthedevelopmentofapatternoflowexecutivepayinJapandespitetherecentweakeningofbankmonitoringasaresultoftheadoptionofU.S.governancestyleinsomeJapanesecompanies.TheJapaneseexperiencealsodemonstratesthatlowerexecutivecompensationdoesnotresultincompromisingfirmperformanceandisanecessaryconditiontobuildastakeholder−friendlycorporation.Forexample,theCEOofToyota(world’sbiggestautomaker),AkioToyoda,earned184millionyen( 9.5 million compensation for 2009. That does not even put him among the top 200 most highly-paid U.S. company chiefs and the top 20 best paid CEOs in Canada for 2012. Why are Japanese CEOs paid considerably less than their American or Canadian counterparts? This essay argues that the activism of long-term oriented institutional investors such as banks and the tying of executive pay to worker welfare in the context of a culture of intolerance to excessive executive compensation explain to a great extent the development of a pattern of low executive pay in Japan despite the recent weakening of bank monitoring as a result of the adoption of U.S. governance style in some Japanese companies. The Japanese experience also demonstrates that lower executive compensation does not result in compromising firm performance and is a necessary condition to build a stakeholder-friendly corporation. For example, the CEO of Toyota (world’s biggest automaker), Akio Toyoda, earned 184 million yen (1.9 million) in 2012, a 35 percent increase from the previous year. He is the lowest-paid chief of the world’s five biggest automakers and led Toyota to generate the highest return last year among the top five global automakers. Toyota’s outlook for increasing profit prompted the automaker to approve the biggest bonus for workers in the last years. Alan Mulally, Ford Motor’s chief and the best paid among the top five, took home $21 million in 2012

    The Language Problem in Husserl’s Phenomenology

    No full text

    Indeterminate tcdB using a Clostridium difficile PCR assay: a retrospective cohort study

    No full text
    Abstract Background C. difficile (CD) real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for toxin B gene (tcdB) is more sensitive, and reduces turnaround time when compared to toxin immunoassay. We noted typical amplification curves with high tcdB cycle thresholds (Ct) and low endpoints (Ept) that are labeled negative by the Xpert® C. difficile assay (Cepheid) and undertook this study to determine their significance. Methods We defined an indeterminate CD assay result as detection of a typical PCR amplification curve with an Ept >10 that was interpreted as negative by the Xpert® assay. Samples with indeterminate Xpert® result were collected for 5 months and retested by Xpert®, cultured for toxigenic CD, and isolates subjected to PCR ribotyping, detection of toxin genes and multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) typing. Chart reviews were completed to assess if patients met the Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America CD infection (CDI) clinical case definition. Illness severity was compared with tcdB Ct and culture results. Results During the 5-month study period, 48/3620 (1%) of specimens were indeterminate and 387/3620 (11%) were positive. Of the 48 patients with indeterminate results, 39 (81%) met the clinical case definition of CDI, and 7 of these (18%) met criteria for severe CDI. Toxigenic stool cultures were positive for 86% (6/7) of patients with severe CDI, 19% (6/32) of patients with non-severe CDI, and 44% (4/9) of patients who did not meet the clinical case definition of CDI (p = 0.002). Lower tcdB Ct and higher Ept were associated with greater likelihood of toxigenic culture positivity (p = 0.03) and more severe symptoms (p = 0.06). Indeterminate results were not associated with a particular technologist or instrument module, or CD strain type. Conclusions A subset of specimens (1%) using the Xpert® C. difficile assay have typical amplification curves and are interpreted as negative. At least one-third of these results are associated with positive CD culture. The mechanism of these indeterminate results is not technique-related, equipment-related, or due to particular CD strains. Clinicians should be aware that even PCR testing has the potential to miss CDI cases and further highlights the importance of clinical context when interpreting results

    Five-year results of radiofrequency and laser ablation of benign thyroid nodules: a multicenter study from the Italian minimally-invasive treatments of the thyroid group

    Get PDF
    Background: Radiofrequency and laser ablation (RFA and LA) are effective treatments for benign thyroid nodules. Due to their relatively recent introduction into clinical practice, there are limited long-term follow-up studies. This study aimed to evaluate technique efficacy, rate of regrowth and retreatment over 5 years following RFA or LA and to identify predictive factors of outcome. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, the rate of technique efficacy, regrowth, and retreatment were evaluated in 406 patients treated with either RFA or LA and followed for 5 years after initial treatment. Propensity score matching was used to compare treatments. Cumulative incidence studies with hazard models were used to describe regrowth and retreatment trends and to identify prognostic factors. Logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristics analyses were used for risk factors and their cut-offs. Results: RFA and LA significantly reduced benign thyroid nodule volume, and this reduction was generally maintained for 5 years. Technique efficacy (defined as a reduction 65 50% after 1 year from the treatment) was achieved in 74% of patients (85% in the RFA and 63% in the LA group). Regrowth occurred in 28% of patients (20% in the RFA and 38% in the LA group). In the majority of cases, further treatment was not required as only 18% of patients were retreated (12% in the RFA and 24% in the LA group). These data were confirmed by propensity score matching. Cumulative incidence studies showed that RFA was associated with a lower risk of regrowth and a lower risk of requiring retreatment over time. Overall, technique inefficacy and regrowth were associated with low energy delivery. Retreatments were more frequent in young patients, in large nodules, in patients with lower volume reduction at 1-year, and in cases of low energy delivery (optimal cut-off was 918 J/mL for RFA). Conclusions: Both thermal ablation techniques result in a clinically significant and long-lasting volume reduction of benign thyroid nodules. The risk of regrowth and needing retreatment was lower after RFA. The need for retreatment was associated with young age, large baseline volume, and treatment with low energy delivery
    corecore