941 research outputs found

    UA3/4/8/4 Radio Broadcast Transcript

    Get PDF
    Dero Downing and Jack Thacker interviewed by Dan Modlin regarding the D-Day invasion. Includes recordings of Edward R. Murrow and an unidentified BBC correspondent from 1944

    Comparison of S-100 and OKT6 Antisera in Human Skin

    Get PDF
    The monoclonal antibody OKT6 and antisera against S-100 protein have both been advocated as immunologic markers of Langerhans cells in the skin. S-100 antiserum has an advantage in its ability to stain Langerhans cells in paraffin tissues. In order to evaluate whether these antibodies stain equivalent numbers of Langerhans cells in skin, we compared the staining patterns of S-100 antiserum and OKT6 antibody on biopsy specimens from 40 patients with leprosy using immunoperoxidase techniques. Utilizing OKT6 antibody, greater numbers of positive Langerhans cells were found in the epidermis in tuberculoid leprosy, reversal reaction, and erythema nodosum leprosum than in lepromatous leprosy. However, these differences were not observed with the S-100 antiserum and, overall, fewer cells were found as compared with the OKT6 antibody. In the dermis both antibodies stained “dendritic cells” that were found encircling granulomas in tuberculoid leprosy and reversal reaction. Staining in lepromatous leprosy granulomas, in contrast to the epidermal staining pattern, revealed rare OKT6-positive cells, while S-100 cells were numerous and were more diffusely distributed throughout the granuloma. Our results indicate that antiserum to S-100 protein and OKT6 antibody stain morphologically similar cells (dendritic cells), but do not provide comparable results concerning distribution and frequency of these cells

    Energy End-Use Technologies for the 21st Century. A Report of the World Energy Council

    Get PDF
    This report makes clear the opportunities and places technology development firmly centre stage in meeting and overcoming the challenges confronting the energy industry and policy makers. Energy End-Use Technologies for the 21st Century makes it crystal clear that technologies deployed in 20 to 50 years will be the result of policy and funding decisions taken now and that we cannot afford to duck these decisions if we are to meet the World Energy Council’s goals of energy availability, accessibility and acceptability

    Vehicle Systems Panel deliberations

    Get PDF
    The Vehicle Systems Panel addressed materials and structures technology issues related to launch and space vehicle systems not directly associated with the propulsion or entry systems. The Vehicle Systems Panel was comprised of two subpanels - Expendable Launch Vehicles & Cryotanks (ELVC) and Reusable Vehicles (RV). Tom Bales, LaRC, and Tom Modlin, JSC, chaired the expendable and reusable vehicles subpanels, respectively, and co-chaired the Vehicle Systems Panel. The following four papers are discussed in this section: (1) Net Section components for Weldalite Cryogenic Tanks, by Don Bolstad; (2) Build-up Structures for Cryogenic Tanks and Dry Bay Structural Applications, by Barry Lisagor; (3) Composite Materials Program, by Robert Van Siclen; (4) Shuttle Technology (and M&S Lessons Learned), by Stan Greenberg

    “Dermal Dendritic Cells” Comprise Two Distinct Populations: CD1+ Dendritic Cells and CD209+ Macrophages

    Get PDF
    A key cell type of the resident skin immune system is the dendritic cell (DC), which in normal skin is located in two distinct microanatomical compartments: Langerhans cells (LCs), mainly in the epidermis, and dermal DCs (DDCs), in the dermis. Here, the lineage of DDCs was investigated using monoclonal antibodies and immunohistology. We provide evidence that “DDC” comprise at least two major phenotypic populations of dendritic-appearing cells, immature DC expressing CD1, CD11c and CD208; and macrophages expressing CD209, CD206, CD163, and CD68. These data suggest that dermal dendritic-appearing macrophages comprise a novel part of the innate immune response in the resident skin immune system

    The term "carcinoid" is a misnomer: the evidence based on local invasion

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Since Oberndorfer proposed the term "carcinoid" in 1907, over 100 years have passed. This attractive term was initially proposed for 6 cases of his own experience with 12 submucosal lesions in the small intestine.</p> <p>Oberndorfer summarized the characteristic features of these lesions as follows: (1) small in size and often multiple, (2) histologically undifferentiated with a suggestion of gland-formation, (3) well-defined without any tendency to infiltrate the surroundings, (4) no metastases, and (5) apparently slow-growing reaching no significant size with a seemingly harmless nature.</p> <p>Review</p> <p>This article stresses the malignant nature of "carcinoid" on the basis of local invasion prior to metastases in the first two sessions, (1) with Oberndorfer's original diagram, and (2) with an experimental observation on extraglandular microcarcinoid in a form of "budding".</p> <p>Next, (3) a statistical comparison between a carcinoid group and a non-carcinoid ordinary carcinoma group is introduced on metastasis rates at an early stage with two prescribed factors of the depth of invasion restricted within the submucosa (sm-lesion) and a small tumor size category of 1 cm to 2 cm: the carcinoid group exhibited metastasis rates higher than those in the ordinary carcinoma group when calculated in the stomach and rectum.</p> <p>In the author's experience, "carcinoids" are malignant not only in the gastrointestinal tract but also in the other sites on the basis of local invasion.</p> <p>Lastly, (4) discussion on the terminology of "carcinoid" as a misnomer is carried out.</p> <p>Adequate terms referring to the entity of this malignant tumor group are discussed. One of the most adequate and brief terms for "carcinoid" that is included now in neuroendocrine tumor group would be "endocrinocarcinoma" as per the author's proposal, followed by NEC (neuroendocrinocarcinoma) or GEC (gut endocrinocarcinoma).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The term "carcinoid" is a misnomer that can be confirmed on the basis of local invasion prior to metastases. "No metastases without local invasion" is not of a negligible importance.</p
    • …
    corecore