Pineus boerneri (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) - pulgão-lanígero-do-pínus - praga introduzida em plantios de Pinus spp. no Brasil.

bitstream/item/215473/1/com-tec190.pd

Essigella california (Essig, 1909) (Hemiptera, Aphididae) - praga introduzida em plantios de Pinus spp. no Brasil.

bitstream/item/37720/1/com-tec192.pd

Eulachnus rikeyi (Williams, 1911) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) - praga introduzida em plantios de Pinus spp. no Brasil.

bitstream/item/215472/1/com-tec191-1.pd

Anoplophora glabripennis Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) espécie potencialmente quarentenária para o Brasil.

bitstream/item/215470/1/com-tec194.pd

Lymantria dispar (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) - a mariposa cigana - análise de risco de introdução de praga florestal potencialmente quarentenária no Brasil.

bitstream/item/215471/1/com-tec193.pd

Conjunctival Keratoacanthoma.

Keratoacanthoma generally occurs on the skin; it is rarely found in the conjunctiva. A case of a 34-year-old woman with a rapidly growing conjunctival mass is reported. The tumor was excised with a safety margin to exclude squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathologically it was crateriform and consistent with atypical keratoacanthoma. There has been no recurrence in 2 years of follow-up. Conjunctival keratoacanthoma is rare; differential diagnosis of conventional squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma can be difficult. We recommend complete surgical excision and careful follow-up of crateriform squamous proliferations.59313513

Monitoramento e controle de Pissodes castaneus em Pinus spp.

bitstream/CNPF-2009-09/42331/1/Circular130.pd

Remote heart rate monitoring - Assessment of the Facereader rPPg by Noldus

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) allows contactless monitoring of human cardiac activity through a video camera. In this study, we assessed the accuracy and precision for heart rate measurements of the only consumer product available on the market, namely the Facereader™ rPPG by Noldus, with respect to a gold standard electrocardiograph. Twenty-four healthy participants were asked to sit in front of a computer screen and alternate two periods of rest with two stress tests (i.e. Go/No-Go task), while their heart rate was simultaneously acquired for 20 minutes using the ECG criterion measure and the Facereader™ rPPG. Results show that the Facereader™ rPPG tends to overestimate lower heart rates and underestimate higher heart rates compared to the ECG. The Facereader™ rPPG revealed a mean bias of 9.8 bpm, the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) ranged from almost -30 up to +50 bpm. These results suggest that whilst the rPPG Facereader™ technology has potential for contactless heart rate monitoring, its predictions are inaccurate for higher heart rates, with unacceptable precision across the entire range, rendering its estimates unreliable for monitoring individuals