Novel functionalized polymers for nanoparticle formulations with anti cancer drugs

The chemistry and structure of Poly (glycerol adipate) facilitate its substitution with various pendant functional groups leading to modifications of the physicochemical properties of the polymer. Modified backbones then can be selected based upon the properties of the compound to be incorporated. Thus, this could be explored as a drug delivery system without many of the limitations of commercially available polymers. The aim of this study was investigate whether various polymers and drugs interact in a specific manner and whether the nature of these interactions influence the physicochemical characteristics of the particles and their drug loading and release profile. By investigating drugs belonging to various classes and with different properties it has been possible to correlate properties associated with drugs and pendant functional groups of the polymer which are ultimately responsible for the drug loading and release characteristics. For some drug polymer formulations, good loading and controlled release rates have been achieved. Compared to various conventional polymer systems reported for nanoparticle formulations, poly (glycerol adipate) polymers have also demonstrated the ability to control rate of release of highly water soluble drugs, even from the most hydrophilic polymer backbone in its unsubstituted form. From the various drug loading and release profiles it has been demonstrated that, unlike reported literature, particle size is not the primary factor influencing drug release over the relatively small range of particle sizes seen in this study. Neither is the water solubility of either the drug or the polymer alone responsible for the rapid and uncontrolled release profile from nanoparticles. Thus, Drug polymer interactions are more likely to influence drug loading and release and unlike common reports in the literature, hydrophilicity, molecular weight or concentration of polymer / drug are less likely to affect these parameters in isolation

Novel functionalized polymers for nanoparticle formulations with anti cancer drugs

The chemistry and structure of Poly (glycerol adipate) facilitate its substitution with various pendant functional groups leading to modifications of the physicochemical properties of the polymer. Modified backbones then can be selected based upon the properties of the compound to be incorporated. Thus, this could be explored as a drug delivery system without many of the limitations of commercially available polymers. The aim of this study was investigate whether various polymers and drugs interact in a specific manner and whether the nature of these interactions influence the physicochemical characteristics of the particles and their drug loading and release profile. By investigating drugs belonging to various classes and with different properties it has been possible to correlate properties associated with drugs and pendant functional groups of the polymer which are ultimately responsible for the drug loading and release characteristics. For some drug polymer formulations, good loading and controlled release rates have been achieved. Compared to various conventional polymer systems reported for nanoparticle formulations, poly (glycerol adipate) polymers have also demonstrated the ability to control rate of release of highly water soluble drugs, even from the most hydrophilic polymer backbone in its unsubstituted form. From the various drug loading and release profiles it has been demonstrated that, unlike reported literature, particle size is not the primary factor influencing drug release over the relatively small range of particle sizes seen in this study. Neither is the water solubility of either the drug or the polymer alone responsible for the rapid and uncontrolled release profile from nanoparticles. Thus, Drug polymer interactions are more likely to influence drug loading and release and unlike common reports in the literature, hydrophilicity, molecular weight or concentration of polymer / drug are less likely to affect these parameters in isolation

Differential uptake, kinetics and mechanisms of intracellular trafficking of next-generation antisense oligonucleotides across human cancer cell lines.

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) modulate cellular target gene expression through direct binding to complementary RNA. Advances in ASO chemistry have led to the development of phosphorothioate (PS) ASOs with constrained-ethyl modifications (cEt). These next-generation cEt-ASOs can enter cells without transfection reagents. Factors involved in intracellular uptake and trafficking of cEt-ASOs leading to successful target knockdown are highly complex and not yet fully understood. AZD4785 is a potent and selective therapeutic KRAS cEt-ASO currently under clinical development for the treatment of cancer. Therefore, we used this to investigate mechanisms of cEt-ASO trafficking across a panel of cancer cells. We found that the extent of ASO-mediated KRAS mRNA knockdown varied significantly between cells and that this did not correlate with bulk levels of intracellular accumulation. We showed that in cells with good productive uptake, distribution of ASO was perinuclear and in those with poor productive uptake distribution was peripheral. Furthermore, ASO rapidly trafficked to the late endosome/lysosome in poor productive uptake cells compared to those with more robust knockdown. An siRNA screen identified several factors mechanistically involved in productive ASO uptake, including the endosomal GTPase Rab5C. This work provides novel insights into the trafficking of cEt-ASOs and mechanisms that may determine their cellular fate

Phosphonium polymethacrylates for siRNA delivery: effect of polymer and RNA structural parameters on polyplex assembly and gene knockdown

Synthetic polymers containing quaternary phosphonium salts are an emerging class of materials for the delivery of oligo/polynucleotides. In this work, cationic phosphonium salt-containing polymethacrylates –and their corresponding ammonium analogues– were synthesized by RAFT polymerization. Both the nature of the charged heteroatom (N vs. P) and the length of the spacer separating the cationic units along the polymer backbone (oxyethylene vs. trioxyethylene) were systematically varied. Polymers efficiently bound siRNA at N+/P- or P+/P- ratios of 2 and above. At a 20:1 ratio, small polyplexes (Rh: 4-15 nm) suitable for cellular uptake were formed that displayed low cytotoxicity. Whilst siRNA polyplexes from both ammonium and phosphonium polymers were efficiently internalised by GFP-expressing 3T3 cells, no knockdown of GFP expression was observed. However, 65% Survivin gene knockdown was observed when short interfering RNA (siRNA) was replaced with novel, multimerised long interfering liRNA (liRNA) in HeLa cells, demonstrating the importance of RNA macromolecular architecture on RNA-mediated gene silencing

Microfluidic-assisted preparation of RGD-decorated nanoparticles: exploring integrin-facilitated uptake in cancer cell lines

From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications RouterHistory: received 2020-02-23, accepted 2020-08-06, registration 2020-08-17, pub-electronic 2020-09-02, online 2020-09-02, collection 2020-12Publication status: PublishedFunder: AstraZeneca; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004325Funder: University of Manchester; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000770Abstract: This study is about fine tuning the targeting capacity of peptide-decorated nanoparticles to discriminate between cells that express different integrin make-ups. Using microfluidic-assisted nanoprecipitation, we have prepared poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles with a PEGylated surface decorated with two different arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptides: one is cyclic (RGDFC) and has specific affinity towards αvβ3 integrin heterodimers; the other is linear (RGDSP) and is reported to bind equally αvβ3 and α5β1. We have then evaluated the nanoparticle internalization in two cell lines with a markedly different integrin fingerprint: ovarian carcinoma A2780 (almost no αvβ3, moderate in α5β1) and glioma U87MG (very high in αvβ3, moderate/high in α5β1). As expected, particles with cyclic RGD were heavily internalized by U87MG (proportional to the peptide content and abrogated by anti-αvβ3) but not by A2780 (same as PEGylated particles). The linear peptide, on the other hand, did not differentiate between the cell lines, and the uptake increase vs. control particles was never higher than 50%, indicating a possible low and unselective affinity for various integrins. The strong preference of U87MG for cyclic (vs. linear) peptide-decorated nanoparticles was shown in 2D culture and further demonstrated in spheroids. Our results demonstrate that targeting specific integrin make-ups is possible and may open the way to more precise treatment, but more efforts need to be devoted to a better understanding of the relation between RGD structure and their integrin-binding capacity

Microfluidic-assisted preparation of RGD-decorated nanoparticles: exploring integrin-facilitated uptake in cancer cell lines.

Funder: AstraZeneca; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004325Funder: University of Manchester; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000770This study is about fine tuning the targeting capacity of peptide-decorated nanoparticles to discriminate between cells that express different integrin make-ups. Using microfluidic-assisted nanoprecipitation, we have prepared poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles with a PEGylated surface decorated with two different arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptides: one is cyclic (RGDFC) and has specific affinity towards αvβ3 integrin heterodimers; the other is linear (RGDSP) and is reported to bind equally αvβ3 and α5β1. We have then evaluated the nanoparticle internalization in two cell lines with a markedly different integrin fingerprint: ovarian carcinoma A2780 (almost no αvβ3, moderate in α5β1) and glioma U87MG (very high in αvβ3, moderate/high in α5β1). As expected, particles with cyclic RGD were heavily internalized by U87MG (proportional to the peptide content and abrogated by anti-αvβ3) but not by A2780 (same as PEGylated particles). The linear peptide, on the other hand, did not differentiate between the cell lines, and the uptake increase vs. control particles was never higher than 50%, indicating a possible low and unselective affinity for various integrins. The strong preference of U87MG for cyclic (vs. linear) peptide-decorated nanoparticles was shown in 2D culture and further demonstrated in spheroids. Our results demonstrate that targeting specific integrin make-ups is possible and may open the way to more precise treatment, but more efforts need to be devoted to a better understanding of the relation between RGD structure and their integrin-binding capacity

Endocytic profiling of cancer cell models reveals critical factors influencing lipid nanoparticle mediated mRNA delivery and protein expression

Lipid nanoparticles have great potential for delivering nucleic acid-based therapeutics, but low efficiency limits their broad clinical translation. Differences in transfection capacity between in vitro models used for nanoparticle pre-clinical testing is poorly understood. To address this, using a clinically relevant lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivering mRNA we highlight specific endosomal characteristics in in vitro tumour models that impact on protein expression. A 30-cell line LNP-mRNA transfection screen identified three cells lines having low, medium and high transfection that correlated with protein expression when they were analysed in tumour models. Endocytic profiling of these cell lines identified major differences in endolysosomal morphology, localisation, endocytic uptake, trafficking, recycling, and endolysosomal pH, identified using a novel pH probe. High transfecting cells showed rapid LNP uptake and trafficking through an organised endocytic pathway to lysosomes or rapid exocytosis. Low transfecting cells demonstrated slower endosomal LNP trafficking to lysosomes, and defective endocytic organisation and acidification. Our data establishes that efficient LNP-mRNA transfection relies on an early and narrow endosomal escape window prior to lysosomal sequestration and/or exocytosis. Endocytic profiling should form an important pre-clinical evaluation step for nucleic acid delivery systems to inform model selection and guide delivery system design for improved clinical translation

Impact of the physical-chemical properties of poly(lactic acid)-poly (ethylene glycol) polymeric nanoparticles on biodistribution

Nanoparticle (NP) formulations are inherently polydisperse making their structural characterization and justification of specifications complex. It is essential, however, to gain an understanding of the physico-chemical properties that drive performance in vivo. To elucidate these properties, drug-containing poly(lactic acid) (PLA)–poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) block polymeric NP formulations (or PNPs) were sub-divided into discrete size fractions and analyzed using a combination of advanced techniques, namely cryogenic transmission electron microscopy, small-angle neutron and X-ray scattering, nuclear magnetic resonance, and hard-energy X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Together, these techniques revealed a uniquely detailed picture of PNP size, surface structure, internal molecular architecture and the preferred site(s) of incorporation of the hydrophobic drug, AZD5991, properties which cannot be accessed via conventional characterization methodologies. Within the PNP size distribution, it was shown that the smallest PNPs contained significantly less drug than their larger sized counterparts, reducing overall drug loading, while PNP molecular architecture was critical in understanding the nature of in vitro drug release. The effect of PNP size and structure on drug biodistribution was determined by administrating selected PNP size fractions to mice, with the smaller sized NP fractions increasing the total drug-plasma concentration area under the curve and reducing drug concentrations in liver and spleen, due to greater avoidance of the reticuloendothelial system. In contrast, administration of unfractionated PNPs, containing a large population of NPs with extremely low drug load, did not significantly impact the drug's pharmacokinetic behavior - a significant result for nanomedicine development where a uniform formulation is usually an important driver. We also demonstrate how, in this study, it is not practicable to validate the bioanalytical methodology for drug released in vivo due to the NP formulation properties, a process which is applicable for most small molecule-releasing nanomedicines. In conclusion, this work details a strategy for determining the effect of formulation variability on in vivo performance, thereby informing the translation of PNPs, and other NPs, from the laboratory to the clinic.</p

Novel functionalized polymers for nanoparticle formulations with anti cancer drugs

The chemistry and structure of Poly (glycerol adipate) facilitate its substitution with various pendant functional groups leading to modifications of the physicochemical properties of the polymer. Modified backbones then can be selected based upon the properties of the compound to be incorporated. Thus, this could be explored as a drug delivery system without many of the limitations of commercially available polymers. The aim of this study was investigate whether various polymers and drugs interact in a specific manner and whether the nature of these interactions influence the physicochemical characteristics of the particles and their drug loading and release profile. By investigating drugs belonging to various classes and with different properties it has been possible to correlate properties associated with drugs and pendant functional groups of the polymer which are ultimately responsible for the drug loading and release characteristics. For some drug polymer formulations, good loading and controlled release rates have been achieved. Compared to various conventional polymer systems reported for nanoparticle formulations, poly (glycerol adipate) polymers have also demonstrated the ability to control rate of release of highly water soluble drugs, even from the most hydrophilic polymer backbone in its unsubstituted form. From the various drug loading and release profiles it has been demonstrated that, unlike reported literature, particle size is not the primary factor influencing drug release over the relatively small range of particle sizes seen in this study. Neither is the water solubility of either the drug or the polymer alone responsible for the rapid and uncontrolled release profile from nanoparticles. Thus, Drug polymer interactions are more likely to influence drug loading and release and unlike common reports in the literature, hydrophilicity, molecular weight or concentration of polymer / drug are less likely to affect these parameters in isolation.EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

Challenges and strategies in anti-cancer nanomedicine development: An industry perspective

Successfully translating anti-cancer nanomedicines from pre-clinical proof of concept to demonstration of therapeutic value in the clinic is challenging. Having made significant advances with drug delivery technologies, we must learn from other areas of oncology drug development, where patient stratification and target-driven design have improved patient outcomes. We should evolve our nanomedicine development strategies to build the patient and disease into the line of sight from the outset. The success of small molecule targeted therapies has been significantly improved by employing a specific decision-making framework, such as AstraZeneca's 5R principle: right target/efficacy, right tissue/exposure, right safety, right patient, and right commercial potential. With appropriate investment and collaboration to generate a platform of evidence supporting the end clinical application, a similar framework can be established for enhancing nanomedicine translation and performance. Building informative data packages to answer these questions requires the following: (I) an improved understanding of the heterogeneity of clinical cancers and of the biological factors influencing the behaviour of nanomedicines in patient tumours; (II) a transition from formulation-driven research to disease-driven development; (III) the implementation of more relevant animal models and testing protocols; and (IV) the pre-selection of the patients most likely to respond to nanomedicine therapies. These challenges must be overcome to improve (the cost-effectiveness of) nanomedicine development and translation, and they are key to establishing superior therapies for patients