18 research outputs found

    STR-930: CROSS LAMINATED TIMBER WALLS WITH OPENINGS: IN-PLANE STIFFNESS PREDICTION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

    Get PDF
    Cross-laminated timber (CLT) is gaining popularity in residential and non-residential applications in the North American construction market. An accurate quantification of in-plane stiffness of the CLT walls with openings is required to design a CLT structure subjected to lateral loads. Nevertheless, till today, no general approach is available for the design of CLT-members loaded in plane and there are no standardized methods for determining the stiffness of CLT shearwalls in the respective material design standards: the CSA O86 in Canada, and the NDS in the US. This study aims to quantify the stiffness of CLT walls with openings under in-plane loading. A finite element (FE) model of CLT walls was developed modelling wood as orthotropic elastic material and the glue-lines between layers using non-linear contact elements. The FE model was verified from test results of CLT panels under in-plane loading. A parametric study was performed to evaluate the change in stiffness of CLT walls with the variation of opening size and shape. A simplified equation to predict the in-plane stiffness of CLT walls with openings was proposed. Subsequently, a sensitivity analysis was performed using Meta-model of Optimal Prognosis (MOP) to evaluate the contribution of each parameter on the model response

    ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π½Π° Π³Π΅ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ рударството

    Get PDF
    Π‘ΠΎ помош Π½Π° Π³Π΅ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° сС постигнува Π±Ρ€Π·ΠΎ, Сфикасно, Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ нСдСструктивно Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ°Π²Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ΄Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ областа Π½Π° Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π°, рударството, Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΈΡˆΡ‚Π²ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ, водостопанството, Π°Ρ€Ρ…Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π°, Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€. Π“Π΅ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ…Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΎ сС ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ€Π·ΡƒΠ²Π°Π°Ρ‚ со ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΎΡ“Π°Π»ΠΈΡˆΡ‚Π°, Π½ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΈΠ΅ исто Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠ°, Π½ΡƒΠ΄Π°Ρ‚ ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π» Π·Π° Π΅Π²Π°Π»ΡƒΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Π³Π΅ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ…Π½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ€Π·Π°Π½ΠΈ со Π½Π°ΠΎΡ“Π°Π»ΠΈΡˆΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΡ€Π°ΡšΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° Ρ€ΡƒΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡ‚. Π’Π°ΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π³Π΅ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ…Π½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΡƒΠ²Π°Π°Ρ‚ Π½Π΅ само ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π½Π° Π½Π°ΠΎΡ“Π°Π»ΠΈΡˆΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎ, Ρ‚ΡƒΠΊΡƒ ΠΈ Π΄Π° Π³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π°Ρ‚ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‚ Π½Π° карпСстата маса, Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡˆΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π° структура ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠΎΡ‚ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈ. Π£Π»ΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° Π³Π΅ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π° Π²ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π±Ρ€Π·ΠΎ сС ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ послСднитС Π΄Π΅Ρ†Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅Ρ˜Π·ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ‚Π° ваТност Π²ΠΎ рударството ΡΠ΅ΡƒΡˆΡ‚Π΅ Π½Π΅ Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Ρ‚Π°. Π‘Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π·Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ„Π°ΡœΠ°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° Π³Π΅ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π° Π²ΠΎ рударството сС повСќС β€žΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΈβ€œ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΊΡƒ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ…Π½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ, бидСјќи рударскитС ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ историски (ΠΈΠ°ΠΊΠΎ нСсвСсно) Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π³ΠΈ отстранувалС Π³Π΅ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ‡Π°Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΎΠ΄ пСрсоналот Π·Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΎΡ˜ ΠΈ производство Π½Π° Ρ€ΡƒΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Π΅

    Geomechanical characteristics of the tailing dam "Topolnica"

    Get PDF
    The tailing dam "Topolnicaβ€œ is a storage type because it has a dual purpose, that is used for the disposal of tailings flotation in the space of a river bed and it accumulate fluid flow water from the river Topolnica which serving open pit mine with drinking water. First projected elevation was 610 m above sea level, it has long been exceeded and reached final height of 90 meters. In the last couple of years, when the elevation of the tailing dam arid approached to the final projected elevation, the open pit mine approached to develop technical documentation for the same elevation. It was made a additional project for elevation to the upstream slope for 20 meters, elevation 630 m. In 2006 it was made second additional project for elevation of the upstream slope for another 24 meters, elevation 654 m and a total height of the crown of 136 meters. With the implementation of a additional project for tailing dam it is numbered as a highest dams in Europe

    Seismic performance of braced timber frames

    No full text
    Braced timber frames are efficient lateral load resistance systems in buildings where large open spaces are required, and the more commonly used timber shear wall systems cannot be utilized. Braced timber frames allow for flexibility in the design and use the wood in its strongest direction - parallel to grain in tension or compression. For application in high-risk earthquake zones, however, the ductility of the system is a concern, since energy absorption is typically limited to the connection region. This study focused on seismic behaviour of braced timber frames with particular emphasis on investigating the influence of different connection details on the overall stiffness, strength and seismic energy absorption capacity of the frame. Monotonic tension and cyclic quasi-static tests were conducted on a variety of connections typically used in braced timber frames, utilizing different diameter bolts and high strength glulam rivets with steel side plates. Shake table tests were subsequently conducted on a selected number of single storey braced frames with some of the connections previously tested and on a two storey braced timber frame model with riveted connections. The experimental results from quasi-static tests and shake table tests were used to establish and verify non-linear analytical models representing the load-deformation behaviour of different connections. These hysteresis curves were then introduced in analytical braced frame models. These models were used in a number of non-linear static and dynamic analyses to determine the response of braced frames to the input of five different records from previous earthquakes. From these analyses it was possible to determine the influence of different connection details on the seismic response of the selected types of braced timber frames. Based on the results from the analytical part of the study, an estimate was made on the appropriate force modification factors (R-factors) for earthquake resistant design of braced timber frames, as used in the National Building Code of Canada. Finally, some design and construction recommendations are discussed to inform the reader of the details required to obtain an adequate seismic performance. Possible ways of improving the seismic behaviour of braced timber frames are presented as well.Applied Science, Faculty ofCivil Engineering, Department ofGraduat

    Blind prediction of the seismic response of the NEESWood Capstone Building

    No full text
    The NEESWood Project is a multi-year US research project that involves analysis, testing, and societal risk assessment with the intent of safely increasing the height of light-frame wood buildings to six stories in regions of moderate to high seismicity. Within this project a full-scale seven-storey, 12.1 m x 18.1 m, condominium building (one storey steel frame and 6 storey wood frame construction) has been tested during July 2009 on the world’s largest earthquake shake table in Miki, Hyogo, Japan. As part of the NEESWood Project the international engineering community was invited to blind predict the inelastic seismic response of the Capstone Building. In this paper results of the blind prediction using the commercially available DRAIN 3-D structural analysis program are presented. The model for the test structure was composed of essentially rigid straight members connected to semi-rigid rotational springs in the vertical plane to represent the shear walls, while floor and roof diaphragms were assumed as rigid. The semi-rigid spring elements were incorporated into the DRAIN- 3D program using a proprietary subroutine simulating the hysteretic behaviour of wood mechanical connections. Properties of the hold-down rods were also included in the model. The required hysteretic parameters for each spring element were obtained by the data package provided by NEESWood researchers for this benchmark study. The results were then compared in terms of time-history responses, maximum base shear, maximum average displacements, interstorey drifts and hold-down tension forces experienced at each storey

    Assessment of seismic design parameters for midply wood shear wall system

    No full text
    A midply shear wall provides greater lateral load capacity per unit length than a standard shear wall. The improved performance is achieved by placing the sheathing between wall stud members, which subjects the nails to double-shear when the wall is loaded in shear. Tests have shown that the average lateral load capacities and energy dissipations of midply walls can be more than three times that of standard shear walls, while their stiffness can be between two to three times the average stiffness of standard shear walls. A proposal for implementation of the midply wall system in wood design codes in North America is presented. Non-linear dynamic analyses of a four-storey wood-frame building were used to determine the seismic design parameters for midply shear walls. The analysis utilized a suite of 22 selected earthquake records scaled to the peak ground acceleration stipulated in the National Building Code of Canada 2005 for Vancouver, British Columbia. The probability of failure was determined for building built with both standard and midply shear walls. Using the standard shear walls as the bench mark, this study indicates that a ductility-related force modification factor R d = 3 could be safely assigned for the midply shear wall system to achieve the same safety level as the standard shear wall system

    Π“Π΅ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡƒΡ€Π³ΠΈΡ˜Π°

    Get PDF
    ΠŸΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Сколошки ΠΈ социо-Скономски Π±Π°Ρ€Π°ΡšΠ° Π²ΠΎ Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ°Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ рСсурси Π±Π°Ρ€Π°Π°Ρ‚ сСопфатно знаСњС Π·Π° Ρ€ΡƒΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π°Ρ‚Π° Π΄ΡƒΡ€ΠΈ ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Ρ„Π°Π·ΠΈ Π½Π° рударскиот процСс. Π“Π΅ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΡƒΡ€Π³ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ€Π° гСолошки ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π·Π° Π΄Π° создадС просторСн ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» Π·Π° ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡ€Π°ΡšΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡƒΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ со производството. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΡƒΡ€ΡˆΠΊΠΈΠΎΡ‚ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ ја ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΡƒΠ²Π° Сфикасноста Π½Π° рСсурситС, Π³ΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΌΠ°Π»ΡƒΠ²Π° ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ†ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ°Π³Π° Π²ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° производството Π½Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ² Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½ ΡˆΡ‚ΠΎ исто Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠ° сС Ρ€Π°Π·Π³Π»Π΅Π΄ΡƒΠ²Π°Π°Ρ‚ одрТливоста ΠΈ социо-СкономскитС Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈ. Π‘ΠΎ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΡƒΡ€ΡˆΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π΄Π° сС ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡ΡƒΠ²Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎ производствСно сцСнарио ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π½ΡƒΠ²Π°Ρ˜ΡœΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎ изводливоста ΠΈ Ρ„Π°Π·ΠΈ Π½Π° производство. ΠŸΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°Ρ‚ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΈ Π°Π»Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈ Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ Π·Π° Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π΅ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΡƒΡ€ΡˆΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π», Π½ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΠΎΡˆΠΊΠΈΠΎΡ‚ пристап Π΅ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ (Π·Π°Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ) ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π° сС усвои Π·Π° сСкаков Π²ΠΈΠ΄ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ суровини. Овој Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡˆΡƒΠ²Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ Π²Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ сС користи Π²ΠΎ рударската ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡƒΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π° ΠΈ Π³ΠΈ дСмонстрира ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ²ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π²ΠΎ однос Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° Сфикасност Π½Π° рСсурситС Π²ΠΎ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ Ρ€ΡƒΠ΄Π½ΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ. ΠšΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π½ΠΈ Π·Π±ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ
    corecore