18 research outputs found
Experimental Generation of Carcinoma-Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) from Human Mammary Fibroblasts
Carcinomas are complex tissues comprised of neoplastic cells and a non-cancerous compartment referred to as the 'stroma'. The stroma consists of extracellular matrix (ECM) and a variety of mesenchymal cells, including fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, endothelial cells, pericytes and leukocytes(1-3)
Recommended from our members
Combined Inhibition of mTOR and CDK4/6 Is Required for Optimal Blockade of E2F Function and Long-term Growth Inhibition in Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer.
The cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)-retinoblastoma (RB)-E2F pathway plays a critical role in the control of cell cycle in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Small-molecule inhibitors of CDK4/6 have shown promise in this tumor type in combination with hormonal therapies, reflecting the particular dependence of this subtype of cancer on cyclin D1 and E2F transcription factors. mTOR inhibitors have also shown potential in clinical trials in this disease setting. Recent data have suggested cooperation between the PI3K/mTOR pathway and CDK4/6 inhibition in preventing early adaptation and eliciting growth arrest, but the mechanisms of the interplay between these pathways have not been fully elucidated. Here we show that profound and durable inhibition of ER+ breast cancer growth is likely to require multiple hits on E2F-mediated transcription. We demonstrate that inhibition of mTORC1/2 does not affect ER function directly, but does cause a decrease in cyclin D1 protein, RB phosphorylation, and E2F-mediated transcription. Combination of an mTORC1/2 inhibitor with a CDK4/6 inhibitor results in more profound effects on E2F-dependent transcription, which translates into more durable growth arrest and a delay in the onset of resistance. Combined inhibition of mTORC1/2, CDK4/6, and ER delivers even more profound and durable regressions in breast cancer cell lines and xenografts. Furthermore, we show that CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant cell lines reactivate the CDK-RB-E2F pathway, but remain sensitive to mTORC1/2 inhibition, suggesting that mTORC1/2 inhibitors may represent an option for patients that have relapsed on CDK4/6 therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(5); 908-20. ©2018 AACR.CRUK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK (Jason Carroll, Igor Chernukhin, Rasmus SiersbÊk3)
Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF 14136) (Rasmus SiersbĂŠk
Identification of a Molecularly-Defined Subset of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Models that Respond to WEE1 or ATR Inhibition, Overcoming PARP Inhibitor Resistance
CĂĄncer de mama y de ovario; InhibiciĂłn WEE1CĂ ncer de mama i d'ovari; InhibiciĂł WEE1Breast and ovarian cancer; WEE1 inhibitionPurpose:
PARP inhibitors (PARPi) induce synthetic lethality in homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient tumors and are used to treat breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. Multiple PARPi resistance mechanisms exist, most resulting in restoration of HRR and protection of stalled replication forks. ATR inhibition was highlighted as a unique approach to reverse both aspects of resistance. Recently, however, a PARPi/WEE1 inhibitor (WEE1i) combination demonstrated enhanced antitumor activity associated with the induction of replication stress, suggesting another approach to tackling PARPi resistance.
Experimental Design:
We analyzed breast and ovarian patient-derived xenoimplant models resistant to PARPi to quantify WEE1i and ATR inhibitor (ATRi) responses as single agents and in combination with PARPi. Biomarker analysis was conducted at the genetic and protein level. Metabolite analysis by mass spectrometry and nucleoside rescue experiments ex vivo were also conducted in patient-derived models.
Results:
Although WEE1i response was linked to markers of replication stress, including STK11/RB1 and phospho-RPA, ATRi response associated with ATM mutation. When combined with olaparib, WEE1i could be differentiated from the ATRi/olaparib combination, providing distinct therapeutic strategies to overcome PARPi resistance by targeting the replication stress response. Mechanistically, WEE1i sensitivity was associated with shortage of the dNTP pool and a concomitant increase in replication stress.
Conclusions:
Targeting the replication stress response is a valid therapeutic option to overcome PARPi resistance including tumors without an underlying HRR deficiency. These preclinical insights are now being tested in several clinical trials where the PARPi is administered with either the WEE1i or the ATRi.This work was supported by the Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), an initiative of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation partially supported by European Regional Development FEDER Funds (FIS PI17/01080 to V. Serra, PI12/02606 to J. Balmaña); European Research Area-NET, Transcan-2 (AC15/00063), AsociaciĂłn Española contra el CĂĄncer (AECC; LABAE16020PORTT), the AgĂšncia de GestiĂł d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR; 2017 SGR 540), La MaratĂł TV3 (654/C/2019), and ERAPERMED2019â215 to V. Serra. We also acknowledge the GHD-Pink program, the FERO Foundation, and the Orozco Family for supporting this study (to V. Serra). V. Serra was supported by the Miguel Servet Program (ISCIII; CPII19/00033); M. Castroviejo-Bermejo and C. Cruz (AIOC15152806CRUZ) by AECC; A. Herencia-Ropero by Generalitat de Catalunya-PERIS (SLT017/20/000081); M. Palafox by Juan de la Cierva (FJCI-2015â25412); A. Lau by AECC and Generalitat de Catalunya-PERIS (INVES20095LLOP, SLT002/16/00477); A. Gris-Oliver by FI-AGAUR (2015 FI_B 01075). This work was supported by Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF-19â08), Instituto de Salud Carlos III Project Reference number AC15/00062, and the EC under the framework of the ERA-NET TRANSCAN-2 initiative co-financed by FEDER, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CB16/12/00449 and PI19/01181), and AsociacioÌn EspanÌola Contra el CaÌncer (to J. Arribas). The xenograft program in the Caldas laboratory was supported by Cancer Research UK and also received funding from an EU H2020 Network of Excellence (EuroCAN). The RPPA facility is funded by NCI #CA16672
Rapid activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition drives PARP inhibitor resistance in Brca2-mutant mammary tumours
Tumours defective in the DNA homologous recombination repair pathway can be effectively treated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors; these have proven effective in clinical trials in patients with BRCA gene function-defective cancers. However, resistance observed in both pre-clinical and clinical studies is likely to impact on this treatment strategy. Over-expression of phosphoglycoprotein (P-gp) has been previously suggested as a mechanism of resistance to the PARP inhibitor olaparib in mouse models of Brca1/2-mutant breast cancer. Here, we report that in a Brca2 model treated with olaparib, P-gp upregulation is observed but is not sufficient to confer resistance. Furthermore, resistant/relapsed tumours do not show substantial changes in PK/PD of olaparib, do not downregulate PARP1 or re-establish double stranded DNA break repair by homologous recombination, all previously suggested as mechanisms of resistance. However, resistance is strongly associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and treatment-naĂŻve tumours given a single dose of olaparib upregulate EMT markers within one hour. Therefore, in this model, olaparib resistance is likely a product of an as-yet unidentified mechanism associated with rapid transition to the mesenchymal phenotype
Extracellular interactome of the FGF receptor-ligand system: Complexities and the relative simplicity of the worm
Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) regulate a multitude of biological functions in embryonic development and in adult. A major question is how does one family of growth factors and their receptors control such a variety of functions? Classically, specificity was thought to be imparted by alternative splicing of the FGFRs, resulting in isoforms that bind specifically to a subset of the FGFs, and by different saccharide sequences in the heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) co-receptor. A growing number of noncanonical co-receptors such as integrins and neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) are now recognized as imparting additional complexity to classic FGFR signaling. This review will discuss the noncanonical FGFR ligands and speculate on the possibility that they provide additional and alternative means to determining the functional specificity of FGFR signaling. We will also discuss how invertebrate models such as C. elegans may advance our understanding of noncanonical FGFR signaling. Developmental Dynamics 238:277â293, 2009. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc
Experimental Generation of Carcinoma-Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) from Human Mammary Fibroblasts
The use of 18F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) as a non-invasive pharmacodynamic biomarker to determine the minimally pharmacologically active dose of AZD8835, a novel PI3Kα inhibitor.
The phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase (PI3K), AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal transduction pathway is frequently de-regulated and activated in human cancer and is an important therapeutic target. AZD8835 is a PI3K inhibitor, with selectivity against PI3K α and Ύ isoforms, which is currently in Phase 1 clinical trials. 18F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) is a non-invasive pharmacodynamic imaging biomarker that has become an integral part of drug development. It has been used widely with PI3K inhibitors both clinically and pre-clinically because of the role of the PI3K pathway in glucose metabolism. In this study we investigated the potential of 18F-FDG PET as a non-invasive pharmacodynamic biomarker for AZD8835. We sought to understand if 18F-FDG PET could determine the minimally effective dose of AZD8835 and correlate with other pharmacodynamic biomarkers for validation of its use in clinical development. 18F-FDG PET scans were performed in nude mice in the BT474C breast xenograft model. Mice were fasted prior to imaging and static 18F-FDG PET was performed. Treatment groups received AZD8835 by oral gavage at a dose volume of 10ml/kg. Treatment groups received either 3, 6, 12.5, 25 or 50mg/kg AZD8835. Tumour growth was monitored throughout the study, and at the end of the imaging procedure, tumours were taken and a full pharmacodynamic analysis was performed.Results showed that AZD8835 reduced 18F-FDG uptake at a dose of 12.5, 25 and 50mg/kg with no significant reduction at doses of 3 and 6mg/kg. These results were consistent with other pharmacodynamics biomarkers measured and show 18F-FDG PET as a sensitive biomarker with the ability to determine the minimal effective dose of AZD8835.Our pre-clinical studies support the use of 18F-FDG PET imaging as a sensitive and non- invasive pharmacodynamic biomarker (understanding the role of PI3K signalling in glucose uptake) for AZD8835 with a decrease in 18F-FDG uptake observed at only two hours post treatment. The decrease in 18F-FDG uptake was dose dependent and data showed excellent PK/PD correlation. This data supports and parallels observations obtained with this class of compounds in patients
Pharmacodynamic knockdown of PI3K pathway activity using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET is observed 2 hours after dosing in the BT474C model at 12.5, 25 and 50mg/kg.
<p>Tumour <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake following AZD8835 dosing (individual animal data). (vehicle n = 8; AZD8835 3mg/kg n = 9; AZD8835 6mg/kg n = 9; AZD8835 12.5mg/kg n = 7; AZD8835 25mg/kg n = 8; AZD8835 50mg/kg n = 4). Representative images demonstrate the decrease in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake at the highest dose of 50mg/kg compared to vehicle.</p
Pharmacokinetic and Meso Scale Discovery Assay (MSD) data demonstrate a good dose response effect following AZD8835 administration.
<p>A) Plasma pharmacokinetic analysis following AZD8835 dosing. Vehicle treated animals showed no circulating AZD8835; AZD8835 3mg/kg n = 9; AZD8835 6mg/kg; AZD8835 12.5mg/kg n = 7; AZD8835 25mg/kg n = 8; AZD8835 50mg/kg n = 4. B) MSD assay to assess AKT phosphorylation. Data is expressed as the % of phosphorylated AKT to total AKT. Vehicle n = 8; AZD8835 3mg/kg n = 9; AZD8835 6mg/kg n = 9; AZD8835 12.5mg/kg n = 7; AZD8835 25mg/kg n = 8; AZD8835 50mg/kg n = 4</p