A terápiás hypothermia szerepe a postresuscitatiós ellátásban - irodalmi áttekintés és saját tapasztalatok

In the last fifteen years mild therapeutic hypothermia became an accepted and widespread therapeutic method in the treatment of successfully resuscitated patients due to sudden cardiac death. Based on the available evidence therapeutic hypothermia is part of the resuscitation guidelines, however, many aspects of its therapeutic use are based on empirical facts. In particular, the subjects of intense debate are the ideal target temperature and the benefit of hypothermia in patients found with non-shockable rhythm. Hypothermia affects almost all organ systems and, therefore, early detection and treatment of side effects are essential. The aim of the authors is to summarize the clinical role and pathophysiologic effects of therapeutic hypothermia in the treatment of resuscitated patients based on current evidence and their practical experience. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(16), 611-617

Supplementary Material for: The optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy during hospitalization among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in daily clinical practice

Introduction: Hospitalization due to heart failure (HF) progression is associated with poor prognosis. This highlights the role of the implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in improving the morbidity and mortality of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). There is limited data about the intrahospital applicability of GDMT in real-world circumstances. We aimed to assess retrospectively the use of cornerstone GDMT including RASi (ACEI/ARB/ARNI), βB, MRA, and SGLT2i treatment in a consecutive real-world HFrEF patient population admitted with signs and symptoms of heart failure to the HF unit of a Hungarian tertiary cardiac centre between 2019 and 2021. The independent predictors of therapy optimization and the applicability of new HFrEF medication (ARNI, SGLT2i, vericiguat) were also investigated. Methods: Statistical comparison of admission and discharge medication was accomplished with Fisher’s exact test. The independent predictors of the introduction of triple therapy (RASi+βB+MRA) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The proportion of patients eligible for vericiguat based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the VICTORIA trial was also investigated, as well as the number of patients suitable for ARNI and SGLT2i, taking into account the contraindications of application contained in the ESC 2021 HF Guidelines. Results: 238 patients were included. During hospitalization, the use of RASi (69% vs. 89%) (ACEI/ARBs (58% vs. 70%), ARNI (10% vs. 19%)), βBs (69% vs. 85%), and MRAs (61% vs. 95%) increased significantly (p<0.05) compared to at admission, and the use of SGLT2i (3% vs. 11%) also rose (p=0.0005). The application ratio of triple (RASi+βB+MRA; 43% vs. 77%) and quadruple (RASi+βB+MRA+SGLT2i; 2% vs. 11%) therapy increased as well (p<0.0001). The independent predictors of discharge application of triple therapy revealed through multivariate logistic regression analysis were age, duration of hospitalization, eGFR, NTproBNP, and presence of diabetes mellitus. Sixty-eight percent of the cohort would have been suitable for vericiguat, 83% for ARNI, and 84% for SGLT2i. Conclusion: High rates of application of disease-modifying drugs are achievable among hospitalized HFrEF patients in severe clinical condition, thus awareness of the need for the initiation of the former must be raised