57 research outputs found

    Burkitt's Lymphoma in a pregnant woman: case report and review of the literature

    Get PDF
    "Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL) is an aggressive B-cellmalignancy with very high proliferation rate,more common inmales than females. Here, we describe a case of Burkitt’s lymphoma in a 24-week pregnant woman with cervical and abdominal involvement. The common genetic event of virtually all BL is a reciprocal chromosomal translocation involving the proto-oncogene MYC and one of the Ig gene heavy or light chain loci. Supportive treatment was administered until early delivery, after which the patient was treated according to protocol LMB96. Pregnancy and tumorogenesis share some important events such as immunologic tolerance, angiogenesis, and editing the host immune response. Little is known about the relationship between these events in pregnancy and in tumorogenesis.

    Role of HMGB1 as a suitable biomarker of subclinical intestinal inflammation and mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Noninvasive biomarkers of high- and low-grade intestinal inflammation and of mucosal healing (MH) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease are currently lacking. We have recently shown that fecal high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein is a novel biomarker of gut inflammation. We aimed at investigating in a mouse model if HMGB1 was able to foresee both a clinically evident and a subclinical gut inflammation and if its normalization indicated MH. We also aimed at confirming the results in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis. METHODS: C57BL6/J mice were treated with increasing doses of dextran sodium sulphate to induce colitis of different severity degrees; 28 with CD, 23 with ulcerative colitis, and 17 controls were also enrolled. Fecal HMGB1 was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblotting. RESULTS: Fecal HMGB1 increased by 5-, 11-, 18-, and 24-folds with dextran sodium sulphate doses of 0.25%, 0.50%, 1%, and 4%, respectively, showing that the protein detected a high-grade and a subclinical inflammation. After a recovery time of 4-week posttreatment, HMGB1 returned to control levels, paralleling MH. In patients, fecal HMGB1 significantly correlated with endoscopic indexes (Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD], endoscopic Mayo subscore), but not with the disease activity indexes (Crohn's disease Activity Index, partial Mayo score). CONCLUSIONS: Fecal HMGB1 is a robust noninvasive biomarker of clinically overt and subclinical gut inflammation; it can also be a surrogate marker of MH. We suggest the use of fecal HMGB1 to monitor the disease course and assess therapy outcomes in inflammatory bowel diseaseBACKGROUND: Noninvasive biomarkers of high- and low-grade intestinal inflammation and of mucosal healing (MH) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease are currently lacking. We have recently shown that fecal high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein is a novel biomarker of gut inflammation. We aimed at investigating in a mouse model if HMGB1 was able to foresee both a clinically evident and a subclinical gut inflammation and if its normalization indicated MH. We also aimed at confirming the results in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis. METHODS: C57BL6/J mice were treated with increasing doses of dextran sodium sulphate to induce colitis of different severity degrees; 28 with CD, 23 with ulcerative colitis, and 17 controls were also enrolled. Fecal HMGB1 was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblotting. RESULTS: Fecal HMGB1 increased by 5-, 11-, 18-, and 24-folds with dextran sodium sulphate doses of 0.25%, 0.50%, 1%, and 4%, respectively, showing that the protein detected a high-grade and a subclinical inflammation. After a recovery time of 4-week posttreatment, HMGB1 returned to control levels, paralleling MH. In patients, fecal HMGB1 significantly correlated with endoscopic indexes (Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD], endoscopic Mayo subscore), but not with the disease activity indexes (Crohn's disease Activity Index, partial Mayo score). CONCLUSIONS: Fecal HMGB1 is a robust noninvasive biomarker of clinically overt and subclinical gut inflammation; it can also be a surrogate marker of MH. We suggest the use of fecal HMGB1 to monitor the disease course and assess therapy outcomes in inflammatory bowel diseas

    Predictive value of night-time heart rate for cardiovascular events in hypertension. The ABP-International study

    Get PDF
    Background - Data from prospective cohort studies regarding the association between ambulatory heart rate (HR) and cardiovascular events (CVE) are conflicting. Methods - To investigate whether ambulatory HR predicts CVE in hypertension, we performed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and HR monitoring in 7600 hypertensive patients aged 52 ± 16 years from Italy, U.S.A., Japan, and Australia, included in the ‘ABP-International’ registry. All were untreated at baseline examination. Standardized hazard ratios for ambulatory HRs were computed, stratifying for cohort, and adjusting for age, gender, blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, serum total cholesterol and serum creatinine. Results - During a median follow-up of 5.0 years there were 639 fatal and nonfatal CVE. In a multivariable Cox model, night-time HR predicted fatal combined with nonfatal CVE more closely than 24 h HR (p = 0.007 and = 0.03, respectively). Daytime HR and the night:day HR ratio were not associated with CVE (p = 0.07 and = 0.18, respectively). The hazard ratio of the fatal combined with nonfatal CVE for a 10-beats/min increment of the night-time HR was 1.13 (95% CI, 1.04–1.22). This relationship remained significant when subjects taking beta-blockers during the follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05–1.25) or subjects who had an event within 5 years after enrollment (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05–1.45) were excluded from analysis. Conclusions - At variance with previous data obtained from general populations, ambulatory HR added to the risk stratification for fatal combined with nonfatal CVE in the hypertensive patients from the ABP-International study. Night-time HR was a better predictor of CVE than daytime HR

    Negative MR4·0 chronic myeloid leukaemia and its possible implications for treatment-free remission

    Get PDF
    © 2019 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have dramatically improved the outcome for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients, resulting in a life expectancy that approaches that of the general population. Nevertheless, lifelong TKI therapy may have consequences, including chronic adverse events that can substantially impact patients’ quality of life, adherence to therapy and treatment success. Recently, several clinical discontinuation trials have demonstrated that 40–60% of chronic phase CML patients (CP-CML) who have achieved a stable deep molecular response (DMR) can stop therapy without relapsing (Breccia & Foà, 2018). Laboratory recommendations for scoring DMR were previously defined as MR4·0 [either detectable disease ⩽0·01% BCR-ABLIS (MR4·0 positive) or undetectable disease in cDNA with 10 000–31 999 ABL1 transcripts or 24 000–76 999 GUSB transcripts (MR4·0 negative)], MR4·5 [either detectable disease ⩽0·0032% BCR-ABLIS (MR4·5 positive) or undetectable disease in cDNA with 32 000–99 999 ABL1 transcripts or 77 000–239 999 GUSB transcripts (MR4·5 negative)], and MR5·0 [either detectable disease ⩽0·001% BCR-ABLIS (MR5·0 positive) or undetectable disease in cDNA with ⩾100 000 ABL1 transcripts or ⩾240 000 GUSB transcripts (MR5·0 negative)] (Cross et al, 2015).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Management of adverse events in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in remission receiving oral azacitidine: experience from the phase 3 randomized QUAZAR AML-001 trial

    Get PDF
    Background Most older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who attain morphologic remission with intensive chemotherapy (IC) will eventually relapse and post-relapse prognosis is dismal. In the pivotal QUAZAR AML-001 trial, oral azacitidine maintenance therapy significantly prolonged overall survival by 9.9 months (P < 0.001) and relapse-free survival by 5.3 months (P < 0.001) compared with placebo in patients with AML in first remission after IC who were not candidates for transplant. Currently, the QUAZAR AML-001 trial provides the most comprehensive safety information associated with oral azacitidine maintenance therapy. Reviewed here are common adverse events (AEs) during oral azacitidine treatment in QUAZAR AML-001, and practical recommendations for AE management based on guidance from international cancer consortiums, regulatory authorities, and the authors’ clinical experience treating patients in the trial. Methods QUAZAR AML-001 is an international, placebo-controlled randomized phase 3 study. Patients aged ≥ 55 years with AML and intermediate- or poor-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis, who had attained first complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) within 4 months before study entry, were randomized 1:1 to receive oral azacitidine 300 mg or placebo once-daily for 14 days in repeated 28-day cycles. Safety was assessed in all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug. Results A total of 469 patients received oral azacitidine (n = 236) or placebo (n = 233). Median age was 68 years. Patients received a median of 12 (range 1–80) oral azacitidine treatment cycles or 6 (1–73) placebo cycles. Gastrointestinal AEs were common and typically low-grade. The most frequent grade 3–4 AEs during oral azacitidine therapy were hematologic events. AEs infrequently required permanent discontinuation of oral azacitidine (13%), suggesting they were effectively managed with use of concomitant medications and oral azacitidine dosing modifications. Conclusion Oral azacitidine maintenance had a generally favorable safety profile. Prophylaxis with antiemetic agents, and blood count monitoring every other week, are recommended for at least the first 2 oral azacitidine treatment cycles, and as needed thereafter. Awareness of the type, onset, and duration of common AEs, and implementation of effective AE management, may maximize treatment adherence and optimize the survival benefits of oral azacitidine AML remission maintenance therapy. Trial registration. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01757535 as of December 2012

    Association of clinic and ambulatory blood pressure with new‐onset atrial fibrillation: A meta‐analysis of observational studies

    No full text
    The aim of this study was to perform a meta‐analysis of studies evaluating the association of clinic and daytime, nighttime, and 24‐h blood pressure with the occurrence of new‐onset atrial fibrillation. We conducted a literature search through PubMed, Web of science, and Cochrane Library for articles evaluating the occurrence of new‐onset atrial fibrillation in relation to the above‐mentioned blood pressure parameters and reporting adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval. We identified five studies. The pooled population consisted of 7224 patients who experienced 444 cases of atrial fibrillation. The overall adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.05 (0.98‐1.13), 1.19 (1.11‐1.27), 1.18 (1.11‐1.26), and 1.23 (1.14‐1.32), per 10‐mmHg increment in clinic, daytime, nighttime, and 24‐h systolic blood pressure, respectively. The degree of heterogeneity of the hazard ratio estimates across the studies (Q and I‐squared statistics) were minimal. The results of this meta‐analysis strongly suggest that ambulatory systolic blood pressure prospectively predicts incident atrial fibrillation better than does clinic systolic blood pressure and that daytime, nighttime, and 24‐h systolic blood pressure are similarly associated with future atrial fibrillation

    Ambulatory Resistant Hypertension and Risk of Heart Failure in the Elderly

    No full text
    (1) Background: The aim of the study was to assess the risk of heart failure (HF) in elderly treated hypertensive patients with white coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), ambulatory nonresistant hypertension (ANRH) and ambulatory resistant hypertension (ARH), when compared to those with controlled hypertension (CH). (2) We studied 745 treated hypertensive subjects older than 65 years. CH was defined as clinic blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mmHg and 24-h BP < 130/80 mmHg; WUCH was defined as clinic BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and 24-h BP < 130/80 mmHg; ANRH was defined as 24-h BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg in patients receiving ≤2 antihypertensive drugs; ARH was defined as 24-h BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg in patients receiving ≥3 antihypertensive drugs. (3) Results: 153 patients had CH, 153 had WUCH, 307 had ANRH and 132 (18%) had ARH. During the follow-up (8.4 ± 4.8 years), 82 HF events occurred. After adjustment for various covariates, when compared to CH, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for HF was 1.30 (0.51–3.32), 2.14 (1.03–4.43) and 3.52 (1.56–7.96) in WUCH, ANRH and ARH, respectively. (4) Conclusions: among elderly treated hypertensive patients, those with ARH are at a considerably higher risk of developing HF when compared to CH
    corecore